top of page
Search

DID I DERIVE THE WRONG INTERPRETATION OF DC FIELD'S SILENCE

Updated: Jan 11

DID I DERIVE THE WRONG INTERPRETATION OF DC FIELD'S SILENCE

Inbox

 

from:     Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Enquiries Kent <enquiries@kent.police.uk>

cc:           se.magistratescourt@cps.gov.uk,

Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>,

date:      9 Jan 2024, 18:46

subject: DID I DERIVE THE WRONG INTERPRETATION OF DC FIELD'S SILENCE

mailed-by:           gmail.com

 

 

To

Kent Police

Enquiries

 

CLAIM NOS: E35YM660 & J00ME572

 

Did I understand DC Filed correctly today, as attached: ToDCField(KentPolice Relieved&OutstandingQueries Maybe Charge Refused(Dcuments)9Jan2024.pdf?

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

One attachment

  • Scanned by Gmail

ToDCField(KentPolice Relieved&OutstandingQueries Maybe Charge Refused(Dcuments)9Jan2024.pdf

Refuse Charge Documents

Inbox

 

Katie Field DC 46015060

Attachments11:29 (1 hour ago)

Good Morning, Please find attached the documents to confirm you have been refuse charged in relation to the investigation with Katrina SALE. There are 2 documen

 

from:     Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Katie Field DC 46015060 <Katie.Field@kent.police.uk>

date:      9 Jan 2024, 12:51

subject: Re: Refuse Charge Documents

mailed-by:           gmail.com

 

Dear DC Field

 

I am relieved that all your investigations on my alleged wrong doings over the past 26 years have now been brought to a closure, when I was busy preparing my defence as attached: PREPARATION FOR DEFENCE AGAINST AN ANTICIPATED CHARGE OF MALICIOUS COMMUNICATIONS.pdf

 

We as a family can now take our much needed holiday to see our relatives in India in 10 days’ time unless there are any outstanding queries you have from me.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

 

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 11:29, Katie Field DC 46015060 <Katie.Field@kent.police.uk> wrote:

 

Good Morning,

 

Please find attached the documents to confirm you have been refuse charged in relation to the investigation with Katrina SALE. There are 2 documents attached as 2 custody records were generated for your arrest and interviews. One of your interviews was voluntary so a custody record was not generated on that occasion.

 

Kind Regards

DC Field 15060

Kent Police

 

This email and any other accompanying document(s) contain information from Kent Police and/or Essex Police, which is confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) or bodies to whom it is addressed. The content, including any subsequent replies, could be disclosable if relating to a criminal investigation or civil proceedings. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by contacting the sender or telephoning Kent Police on 01622 690690 or Essex Police on 01245 491491, as appropriate. For further information regarding Kent Police’s or Essex Police’s use of personal data please go to https://www.kent.police.uk/hyg/privacy/ or https://www.essex.police.uk/hyg/privacy/. Additionally for our Terms and Conditions please go to https://www.kent.police.uk/hyg/terms-conditions/ or https://www.essex.police.uk/hyg/terms-conditions/

 

One attachment

  • Scanned by Gmail:

PREPARATION FOR DEFENCE AGAINST AN ANTICIPATED CHARGE OF MALICIOUS COMMUNICATIONS.pdf

PREPARATION FOR DEFENCE AGAINST AN ANTICIPATED CHARGE OF MALICIOUS COMMUNICATIONS

 

Summary Statement: 

 

The Defendant contends that he is the victim of a national and international criminal conspiracy in Multiple Sectors of Law and Order perpetrated against the Defendant over 26 years to terrorise him, brutalise him, persecute him, victimise him, obstruct justice against him and pervert the course of justice against him.

 

Evidence in support of Statement:

 

(a)

Kent Police OFFICIAL Generated Date: 21/12/2023

 

Bail to Police Station – (with or without conditions)

Custody Record Number               46XA/1546/23

Custody Station                                 Medway

AS Number                                         23/0000/00/362656Q

 

Defendant

Name(s)                                               Shantanu Panigrahi

Date of Birth:                                     08/08/1957

DYO or PPO?      -

Self Defined Ethnicity

Address:                                               3 HOATH LANE, WIGMORE, GILLINGHAM KENT ME8 0SL

Comms                                                 Email Personal nobody@dizum.com

                                                                Home Phone 01634379604

                                                                Mobile Phone 07967789619

First Language

 

Bail Details

Officer in Case                                   PC 46 14767 Corbishley

Alleged Offence(s)                           Malicious Communications                        

Malicious Communications                                         

Malicious Communications

 

Bailed to                                              Medway

(Police Station Address)                 Medway Police Station, Purser Way, Gillingham, Kent

Bailed to date/time                         16/03/2024 17:00

 

. I understand that I have been released on bail and must surrender to the police station as specified above, at the time and date as specified above.

. I have been informed that if I fail to surrender to custody I may commit an offence and be fined, imprisoned or both, and that if I fail to comply with any bail conditions that have been imposed, I may be arrested.

. I have been informed that if I wish to vary any of the bail conditions, I may apply to do so at the police station specified above, stating my reasons.

. I also understand that should a disposal decision be reached whilst I am on bail, I may be contacted by post.

. Unless such a written notice is received cancelling my attendance as specified above, I understand that if I fail to surrender into the custody of the police station as specified above, at the time and date as specified above, I may be fined, imprisoned, or both.

. I have been given a copy of this form.

 

Defendant/Bailee Signature

 

Was an Appropriate adult needed for bail              Yes

 

Appropriate Adult Signature

Appropriate Adult

Name

Company

Address

Comms                                 Work: 03000 411111

 

Interpreter Present          No

 

Interpreter Signature

____________________________________________________________________

Custody Officer Granting Bail                       PS JONES

 

MG4A

Ground for Imposing Conditions

The above named person has been granted bail subject to the following conditions. These conditions are imposed because they appear necessary to prevent that person from:-

 

Committing an Offence Whilst on Bail

____________________________________________________________________

Conditions

Condition Number

1

Reason for Condition

Commit further offences on bail

Condition Type

Condition

Not to contact any educational establishment and Not to contact any person/persons who is employed/attends/any links to an educational establishment. This is directly or indirectly for any reason.

Condition Status

Current

____________________________________________________________________

 

Custody Record No: - 46XA/1546/23

____________________________________________________________________

MG4c NO SURETY/SECURITY ATTACHED TO THIS BAIL

Surety

Amount liability to pay the Court :

Person standing as Surety – Name:

Person standing as Surety – Address (incl Postcode):

Person standing as Surety – Signature:

Recognisance taken by

Officer taking Recognisance (Name/Rank/No)

Officer taking Recognisance Signature

Date/Time taken

____________________________________________________________________

Security

Security – Description of Security taken

Person providing Security – Home address:

Person providing Security – Signature:

Security taken by

Officer taking Security (Name/Rank/No)

Officer taking Security Signature

Date/Time taken

____________________________________________________________________

Information to suspects released on bail

Bail legislation is contained with the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, as amended in 2017 & 2022.

If released on bail the following is applicable:-

. You must surrender to custody at the date and time as specified above

. You will be subject to an Applicable Bail Period (ABP). The ABP covers a period that you can be bailed within by the Custody Officer before it is reviewed to ensure the investigation is being dealt with diligently and expeditiously and to ensure that bail is still necessary and proportionate.

. If initially you were released on bail before 28/10/2022 the ABP was authorised by a Police Inspector for 28 days. The ABP can be reviewed, and an extension for another three calendar months may be authorised on or before 28 days, by a Police Superintendent. Further extensions can be authorised at 3 calendar month intervals thereafter.

. If initially you wre released on bail after 28/10/2022 the ABP was authorised by the Custody Officer for 3 calendar months. The ABP can be reviewed, and an extension for another 3 calendar months may be authorised, on or before 3 calendar months, by a Police Inspector. Further extensions can be authorised at 3 calendar months intervals thereafter.

. If your case is being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office, or the Financial Conduct Authority, or

HM Revenue and Customs, or National Crime Agency, the initial ABP for these dases is six months

authorised by the Custody Officer. However, the police do not authorise extensions for these cases.

This must be done by a designated officer for those agencies.

. If your case has been immediately referred to the Crown Prosecution Service the ABP will not start unless they require the investigators to carry out further work.

. You or your legal representative= will be informed of theintention to apply for an extension to the ABP either in person if at the police station or by your preferred means of contact. You will be asked if you want to make any representations either immediately if in person by return of post/email etc.

. Early reviews will be conducted by relevant decision makers and later ones will be conducted by the Courts.

. The ABP will be suspended for the time that the cas3e is sent back to the Crown Prosecution Service.

. You will be informed of the decision and the relevant time and date of the end of your ABP.

. You will also be informed of the actual date and time you are due to answer bail. This may be the same or a different time to the end of an ABP.

. The consequence of all the above is that your bail date can be subject to several amendments.

However a reasonable attempt will always be made to notify you of any changes, in writing to the address that you have provided to the police (or the preferred method of contact), and/or via your legal representative if you have one.

It is important that you notify OIC of any change of your address, your legal representative, or other point of contact, and that you provide us with any current phone numbers and email contact details.

By doing so, we may be able to prevent you having to attend needlessly at a custody suite if we know (especially at short notice) that you have a new, later bail date or other information change (such as ‘No Further Action’.

____________________________________________________________________

Police Advisory Notice to Suspects

If you are involved in criminal proceedings, the following summary of potential offences is included for your information and awareness. The same offences will also be brought to the attention of any relevant victim or witness for their information. The list of offences is NOT exhaustive.

The purpose of this is to make clear to all involved parties that any unlawful, unnecessary or inappropriate contact between the suspect in a case (either directly or through a third party), and the victim or witness may constitute a criminal offence.

Any unlawful, unnecessary or inappropriate contact reported to the police, including any perception that this is the case, may result in arrests and prosecution of parties for any of the following offences

 

Intimidation of witnesses, jurors & others

Under S.51 of the Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 it is an offence to intimidate or threaten by any means any person involved in the investigation of an offence relating to criminal matters.

____________________________________________________________________

In summary proceedings A fine and/or maximum six months imprisonment

On indictment A fine and/or maximum five years imprisonment

____________________________________________________________________

‘Harassment’

Under S.2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, it is an offence for a person to pursue a course of conduct which amounts to harassment of another, and which he/she knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other, or to persuade any person not to do something that they are entitled or required to do, or to do something that they are not under any obligation to do.

____________________________________________________________________

In summary proceedings A fine and/or maximum six months imprisonment

On indictment: A fine and/or maximum two years imprisonment

Please note that other, more serious, offences are also provided for under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997

____________________________________________________________________

Perverting the Course of Justice

Under Common Law, it is an offence to conspire, act or embark upon a course of conduct which has a tendency to, and is intended to pervert, the course of public justice.

Some of the ways where conduct is capable of amounting to this offence is by making false allegations, perjury, concealing offences, obstructing the police, assisting others to evade arrest,

failing to prosecute, interfering with witnesses/evidence/jurors, and publication of matters calculate to prejudice a fair trial.

____________________________________________________________________

On indictment: Maximum LIFE imprisonment

____________________________________________________________________

Postal Charging

This leaflet explains Postal Charging and answers some questions you may have.

What is Postal Charging?

This is a method of bringing an offender before a court for prosecution.

It means that you could be charged and required to attend court by post without returning to a police station.

Can I be charged by post?

If you have been in police custody and you are granted unconditional police bail to return to a police station at a later date you may be charged by means of a ‘postal charge’ if a decision is made to charge you.

How does it work?

If a decision is made to charge you at least 14 days before you are due to answer your bail you may

receive a ‘charge’ and a ‘requisition’ to attend court through the post.

Will I still be on Police bail?

Once a postal charge and requisition has been issued you will no longer be on police bail for that offence.

What do I do if I receive a Postal Charge?

You will receive a charge/requisition form (MG4D). This will state the offence(s) with which you are charged. This will require you to attend court at a specified date and time.

____________________________________________________________________

If you fail to attend court when required a warrant will be issued for your arrest. If this happens, If this happens you may be held in custody until the next available court

____________________________________________________________________

If you do not receive a postal charge or a bail cancellation notice you must answer your police bail at the date and time shown on your bail form.

____________________________________________________________________

 

(b)

Auto-Reply

Inbox

 

KentCPO

06:24 (2 hours ago)

Thank you for your email. We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible. Please do not re-send your que

 

from:     Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>

date:      9 Jan 2024, 08:37

subject: Fwd: Auto-Reply

mailed-by:           gmail.com

 

To

Magistrates, North Kent Magistrates Court

sitting at Medway Magistrates Court

 

Your Honour

 

Please consider that everything that I have personally written in the public domain since 1998 when I lost my cherished scientific career at the University of Greenwich has been under the aegis of the Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited, a company that I formed eventually when my books were turned down by numerous publishers. Kent Police keeps me on bail until 15 March 2024 1700 in the first instance as you would have seen from the correspondence that you have sent me this auto response to but my Company is a bonafide and legitimate unit of the business structure of the State of the United Kingdom and those who are competitors in the highly lucrative market for selling eBooks try to upset my applecart through devious means as the attached Geeta has attempted this morning: ToGeeta(SEOSMPPIP_Homework On Me)9 Jan2024.docx.

 

If the Court considers that the work that I have published is in some way either of Questionable content or even represents malicious communications as may have been alleged by Kent Police although it will not say whether the issues that I was interrogated and investigated on through numerous arrests were specifically to do with communications that I believe were engineered by MI5/MI6 as criminal anonymous emails to disrupt the work of my Company and its parent Foundation 'The Conservative Libertarian Society (https://theconservativelibertariansociety.com) with its political offshoot The Conservative Libertarian Party of the United Kingdom (https://theconservativelibertarianpartyoftheunitedkingdom.com), then only a Court of law should make the decision to ban my Company and all the rest of it through the Retrial Hearing that is pending as linked here: APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION AND SENTENCING: 10 NOVEMBER 2023, 2 PM TRIAL (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/appeal-against-conviction-and-sentencing-10-november-2023-2-pm-trial   

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

Director, The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited

Registered address: 3 Hoath Lane, Wigmore, Gillingham, Kent ME8 0SL, United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: KentCPO <KentCPO@justice.gov.uk>

Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 06:24

Subject: Auto-Reply

To: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

 

Thank you for your email.

We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.

Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.

Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.

If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.

Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/

Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you

Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals planning and preparations

 

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

 

One attachment

  • Scanned by Gmail

ToGeeta(SEOSMPPIP_Homework On Me)9 Jan2024.docx

Re: SEO Packages....

Inbox

 

Geeta

06:26 (1 hour ago)

Hello, I was just wondering if you had a chance to review the previous email I sent to you. I understand the value of your time so I’d like to know what’s the b

 

from:     Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Geeta <geeta1exprot8547@gmail.com>

date:      9 Jan 2024, 07:56

subject: Re: SEO Packages....

mailed-by:           gmail.com

 

Hello Geeta

 

Have you done your homework on me (https://...truncated)?

 

Shan

 

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 06:26, Geeta <geeta1exprot8547@gmail.com> wrote:

 

Hello,

I was just wondering if you had a chance to review the previous email I sent to you.

I understand the value of your time so I’d like to know what’s the best way to reach you and when can we discuss this in more detail?

Thanks you,

Geeta,

____________________________________________________________________

From: Geeta

 

Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2023 11:00 AM

Subject: SEO Packages….

Hello,

How are you?

I can help your website to get on the first page on Google and increase the number of leads and sales you are getting from your website.

We provide the following services.

SEO, SMO, PPC,

Let me know if you are interested, I will send you our SEO Packages and price list.

Thanks & Regards,

Geeta

____________________________________________________________________

Automatic Response

Inbox

 

from:     northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:      9 Jan 2024, 08:39

subject: Automatic Response

mailed-by:           justice.gov.uk

Signed by:           justice.gov.uk

security:                Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

Thank you for your email.

We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.

Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.

Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.

If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.

Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/

 

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

____________________________________________________________________

11.18 pm (UK-Time) 9 January 2024

 

(c)

Refuse Charge Documents

Inbox

 

from:     Katie Field DC 46015060 <Katie.Field@kent.police.uk>

date:      9 Jan 2024, 11:29

subject: Refuse Charge Documents

mailed-by:           kent.police.uk

Signed by:           kent.police.uk

security:                Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

Good Morning,

 

Please find attached the documents to confirm you have been refuse charged in relation to the investigation with Katrina SALE. There are 2 documents attached as 2 custody records were generated for your arrest and interviews. One of your interviews was voluntary so a custody record was not generated on that occasion.

 

Kind Regards

 

DC Field 15060

Kent Police

 

This email and any other accompanying document(s) contain information from Kent Police and/or Essex Police, which is confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) or bodies to whom it is addressed. The content, including any subsequent replies, could be disclosable if relating to a criminal investigation or civil proceedings. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by contacting the sender or telephoning Kent Police on 01622 690690 or Essex Police on 01245 491491, as appropriate. For further information regarding Kent Police’s or Essex Police’s use of personal data please go to https://www.kent.police.uk/hyg/privacy/ or https://www.essex.police.uk/hyg/privacy/. Additionally for our Terms and Conditions please go to https://www.kent.police.uk/hyg/terms-conditions/ or https://www.essex.police.uk/hyg/terms-conditions/

 

 2 attachments

  • Scanned by Gmail

 

(a)

Kent Police: OFFICIAL Generated Date:06/01/2024

MG4F – Refused Charge

Custody Record 46YA/1620/23  Custody Station YA

Case File Ref       46/XY/9708/21 OIC        

               

Defendant           Shantanu PANIGRAHI

Date of Birth       08/08/1957

Address                3 HOATH LANE,

GILLINGHAM,

KENT, ME8 0SL

 

Sir/Madam,

With reference to the below offence(s) for which you were arrested / for which you are under investigation

 

Offences

 PH97011 > Stalking involving serious alarm / distress

 

Based on the evidence currently available a decision has been made to refuse charge you in respect of the above offence(s) because the evidence did not meet evidential stage of the full code test set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors

 

You should be aware of the following:-

The case will be kept under review.

•              The decision not to charge may be re-considered if a review indicates that it was clearly wrong and should not be allowed to stand.

•              If further evidence becomes available in the future, you may be re-arrested and a decision to charge may be made.

•              The defendant has been advised that the case will be kept under review.

•              The fact that no further action is being taken at this time does not prevent an aggrieved party pursuing criminal proceedings or civil remedy.

•              You should ensure you retain any evidence upon which you have relied on whilst in custody.

 

This notice only applies to the offence(s) specified above

•              If you are currently on bail to return to the police station in respect of these offence(s) it will not now be necessary for you to return.

•              It is important to note that any bail conditions imposed in relation to any other offences will still apply.

•              Any biometric material will be deleted or may be subject to an application to the Commissioner for the Retention and Use of Biometric Material for extended retention (qualifying offence only) or may be retained indefinitely due to any previous conviction history.

 

Officers Involved

Name of Officer Officer Role

 Sgt 46 11905 Finch         Administering Officer

 CPS       Deciding Officer

 DC 46 15060 Field           Officer in Case

 

(b)

Kent Police OFFICIAL Generated Date:06/01/2024

 

MG4F – Refused Charge

Custody Record 46XC/4807/21  Custody Station XC

Case File Ref       46/XY/9708/21 OIC        

               

Defendant           Shantanu PANIGRAHI

Date of Birth       08/08/1957

Address                3 HOATH LANE,

GILLINGHAM,

KENT, ME8 0SL

 

Sir/Madam,

With reference to the below offence(s) for which you were arrested / for which you are under investigation

 

Offences

 PH97011 > Stalking involving serious alarm / distress

 

Based on the evidence currently available a decision has been made to refuse charge you in respect of the above offence(s) because the evidence did not meet evidential stage of the full code test set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors

 

You should be aware of the following:-

The case will be kept under review.

•              The decision not to charge may be re-considered if a review indicates that it was clearly wrong and should not be allowed to stand.

•              If further evidence becomes available in the future, you may be re-arrested and a decision to charge may be made.

•              The defendant has been advised that the case will be kept under review.

•              The fact that no further action is being taken at this time does not prevent an aggrieved party pursuing criminal proceedings or civil remedy.

•              You should ensure you retain any evidence upon which you have relied on whilst in custody.

 

This notice only applies to the offence(s) specified above

•              If you are currently on bail to return to the police station in respect of these offence(s) it will not now be necessary for you to return.

•              It is important to note that any bail conditions imposed in relation to any other offences will still apply.

•              Any biometric material will be deleted or may be subject to an application to the Commissioner for the Retention and Use of Biometric Material for extended retention (qualifying offence only) or may be retained indefinitely due to any previous conviction history.

 

Officers Involved

Name of Officer Officer Role

 Sgt 46 11905 Finch         Administering Officer

 CPS       Deciding Officer

 DC 46 15060 Field           Officer in Case

____________________________________________________________________

11.56 am (UK-Time) 9 January 2024

 

Comments:

 

No apology has been issued for the arrests, and no explanation has been provided: those will be sought through the court of law when the Malicious Communications alleged offence is prosecuted as the mitigating factors indicating the brutality of the Hate Crime perpetrated against me by Kent Police under false pretences and which disregarded the Defence at a very early date:

(a) Document_2022-5-13_152026.pdf

(b) Particulars of Damages and Compensation.docx:

 

(a)

Notice of Issue

(non-money claim)

In the County Court at Medway

Claim Number J00ME572

Claimant: Shantanu Panigrahi

Defendant: Hugh Pughesley

Issue Fee: £332

Your Claim was issued on 29 April 2022

The court sent it to the defendant by first class post on 12/05/22 and it will be deemed served on 16/05/22. The defendant has until 30/05/22 to reply.


Notes for guidance

*The claim form and the particulars of claim, if served separately, must be served on the defendant within 4 months of the date of issue (6 months if you are serving outside England and Wales). You may be able to apply to extend the time for serving the claim form but the application must generally be made before the 4 month or 6 month period expires.

* You must inform the court immediately if your claim is settled or discontinued.

The defendant may

• Admit the truth of the whole or any part of your claim. The cout will send you a copy of the defendant’s admission and tell you what to do next.

• File an acknowledge of service. This will allow the defendant 28 days from the date of service of your particulars of claim to file a defence or contest the court’s jurisdiction.

• Dispute the whole claim. The court will send you a copy of the defence.

• Not reply at all. You may make an application to the court for judgment. A fee may be payable.

____________________________________________________________________

The Court Office at the County Court at Medway, Medway Civil and Family Court, The Court House,

The Brook, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4JZ. When corresponding with the court, please address forms or

letters to the Court Manager and quote the claim number. Tel: 01634 887900 Fax: 0870 324 0175.

Check if you can issue your claim online. It will save you time and money. Go to

www.moneyclaim.gov.uk to find out more.

N205C Notice of Issue (non money claim)

Produced by: Joana Apetri

CJR179

(Page 2 of 5):

n16a-engInjuctionagainstKentPolice.pdf 432.4kB

Application for Injunction

(General Form)

Name of court Claim No. Medway County Court J00ME572

Claimant's Name and Ref. Shantanu Panigrahi

Defendant's Name and Ref. Kent Police

Fee Account no. HWF-9K4-EYL/HQ17X01773

Sealed: The County Court

Notes on completion

Tick which boxes apply and specify the legislation where appropriate

By application in pending proceedings Yes

Under Statutory provision Yes

This application is made under Part 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules Yes

Seal

This application raises issues under the Human Rights Act 1998 Yes No Yes

The Claimant(1)

(1) Enter the full name of the person making the application applies to the court for an injunction order in the following terms: Shantanu Panigrahi

The Defendant(2)

(2) Enter the full name of the person the injunction is to be directed to: Chief Constable of Kent Police, Hugh Pughesley must stop investigating the Claimant for any offences that it has kept secret from the Claimant after 6 months of (assessment without an explanation to the Claimant

3) Set out any proposed (3) orders requiring acts to be done. Delete if no mandatory order is sought.

The Defendant be forbidden (whether by himself or by instructing or encouraging or permitting any other person)(4) The Chief Constable of Kent Police was served due notice by way of an arrest warrant issued that its harassment and intrusion into the private life of the Claimant constituted a Hate Crime against him

(4) Set out here the proposed terms of the injunction order (if the defendant is a limited company delete the wording in brackets and insert 'whether by its servants, agents, officers or otherwise'). And that(5) The Claimant took out civil proceedings and criminal proceedings again Kent Police.

(5) Set out here any further terms asked for including provision for costs The grounds of this application are set out in the written evidence of(6) (6) Enter the names of all persons who have sworn affidavits or signed statements in support of this application sworn (signed) on The Defendant kept secret the full circumstances of the 1500 criminal anonymous emails received by the Claimant.

This written evidence is served with this application.

This application is to be served upon(7)

(7) Enter the names and addresses of all persons upon whom it is intended to serve this application This application is filed by(8) Hugh Pughesley, Chief Constable of Kent Police, Sutton Road, Maidstone, Kent.

(8) Enter the full name and address for service and delete as required

(the Solicitors for) the Claimant (Applicant/Petitioner) Claimant: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi, 3 Hoath Lane, Wigmore, Gillingham, Kent ME8 0SL. United Kingdom.

whose address for service is Signed Dated 7 April 2022

To* This section to be completed by the court *

Name and address of the person application is directed to of

This application will be heard by the (District) Judge

at on the day of 20 at o'clock If you do not attend at the time shown the court may make an injunction order in your absence If you do not fully understand this application you should go to a Solicitor, Legal Advice Centre or a Citizens' Advice Bureau

The court office at is open between 10am and 4pm Mon - Fri. When corresponding with the court, please address all forms and letters to the Court Manager and quote the claim number.

N16A General form of application for injunction (05.14) © Crown copyright 2014

(Page 3 of 5):

DEFENCE STATEMENT ON HARASSMENT OFFENCE

1. I have never ever sent an email from a Remailer, Austria anonymous email account, or a Nomen Nescio Account, or some other dizum account, or another anonymous email account to anyone whether an official at a government institution, or a private individual.

2. I have received hundreds of emails into my Gmail Phone Account from people like 38 Degrees, Internet Archive, and others which did not appear in my Desktop Gmail Account.

3. I have not sent any emails that has harassed anyone from my Shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com account: hundreds appear to have been sent to people involved with the organisation Victims of Panigrahi Association but clearly my Shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com account was highjacked to get me into legal difficulties with the Central London County Court in respect of Claim E35YM660.

89

4. My shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk was bastardised by trolls and criminals so I could not send out any emails from this Account and had to abandon it a year ago. Any emails sent from this account was done by Victims of Panigrahi Association associated trolls and criminals.

5. All my purposeful emails and I have sent out thousands over the past 20 years were legitimate court-associated legal proceedings in relation to ME010463, ME002953, HQ17X01773, and E35YM660.

6. Whenever a particular recipient of an email from me asked me not to send them any emails, I complied with the request unless court proceedings became prejudiced from my inaction.

7. Since I started my E35YM660 Claim against the Prime Minister and Victims of Panigrahi Association for its criminal anonymous emails to me notably from Sivaji Panesar, Marty Caine, Nitin Bhardwaj, Fritz Wueler, Cherie, Egregious_C, and others like Ed Mulhouse and Monneka Tahir, there was a systematic attempt to have me booted out of this country to places like Pakistan, because I was bringing Kent Police in a £5 million pound damages and compensation Claim in the High Court Queens Bench Division and brought the Crown Prosecution Service to East Kent Magistrates Court on a criminal charge of perverting the course of justice and obstructing justice. That is why I considered that the UK State through its Security Services had wanted to frame charges against me of forensic or criminal nature to have me incarcerated in a mental hospital for a third time or worse to get me committed to a Trial that the County Court in Central London arranged in a Pre-Trial Hearing, but I was exonerated. I told my Consultant Psychiatrist that come what may I will never leave the United Kingdom, and this is the reason that Kent Police is charging me with a concocted summons for Harassment that is not specified to leave the State room for elaboration later. This is done to protect the Central London County Court from having to pass judgment or Order to my Appeal Application which the Court would have to justify that the University of Greenwich was lawful in withholding my £55,000 severance payment.

(Signed)

S.Panigrahi

5.28 pm 15 Sep 2021

(Page 4 of 5):

Claim Form

In the

Claim No J00ME572

Issue Date: 29/04/22/

Sealed The County Court

Claimant’s Name and address including postcode:

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Defendant’s Name and Address including postcode:

Kent Police

Grugeon House,

Police Headquarters,

Sutton Road,

Maidstone

Kent ME15 9BZ

90

Brief details of claim:

This Claim is for compensation and damages suffered by me as the Claimant as a result of Kent

Police’s inaction and actions that has caused me much suffering since 2004.

Value

£100,000 up to £5 million

Preferred County Court Hearing Centre:

Defendants Name and address for service including postcode:

Kent Police

Grugeon House,

Police Headquarters,

Sutton Road,

Maidstone

Kent ME15 9BZ

Amount Claimed: £100, 000.00

Court Fee: £4,500.00

Total amount: £104,500.00

(Page 5 0f 5):

Does this Claim have any issues of interest in the Human Rights Act: Yes

Particulars of Claim: (attached/to follow):

This Claim is brought to the High Court against Kent Police and co-conspirators (officials in Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service, Lawyers, the Legal Ombudsman and the Independent Police

Complaints Commission) against the following chargesheet against this Police Force:

(a) protecting criminals on my submission of Internet Complaint hate crime;

(b) protecting criminals on the Shell Tribunal matter;

(c) protecting criminals in the UKIP proceedings matter;

(d) protecting criminals in the Greenwich Legalities matter;

(e) protecting criminals in the National Health Service directed crimes against me;

(f) protecting criminals in the AuthorhouseUK book publication matter;

(g) protecting the Legal Ombudsman from criminal activities against me with regard to several lawyers that I complained about;

(h) Dover capture by Kent Police in 2004 to incarcerate me in a mental hospital without due reason.

(i) capturing me at home and under handcuffs returning me to the mental hospital from where I had lawfully absconded;

(j) pointless prosecution of speeding offence that I was collecting money to discharge in January 2017;

(k) protecting court officials who gave me an unjustified criminal record with the processing of the speeding offence at Medway Magistrates Court;

(l) protecting the Labour Party in its hate crime of denying me my membership rights to submit Motions, and Questions to the Prime Minister.

Statement of Truth:

I believe that the facts stated in these particulars of claim are true

Full Name: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

Signature

 

(b)

Particulars of Damages and Compensation

 

This Claim is brought to the High Court against Kent Police (and by extension the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom) and co-conspirators (officials in Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service, Lawyers, the Legal Ombudsman and the Independent Police Complaints Commission) for the following chargesheet against this Police Force:

 

(a) protecting criminals on my submission of Internet Complaint hate crime by Phands and MI5:

£250,000

(b) protecting criminals on the Shell Tribunal matter; Shell Company: £5,000

(c) protecting criminals in the UKIP proceedings matter; UKIP £1000

(d) protecting criminals in the Greenwich Legalities matter; University of Greenwich back pay

£30,000*24 years on 20 October 2022: £720,000.

(e) protecting criminals in the National Health Service directed crimes against me; (£1,000,000)

(f) protecting criminals in the AuthorhouseUK book publication matter; £3,000.

(g) protecting the Legal Ombudsman and Solicitors Regulation Authority from criminal activities against me with regard to numerous lawyers that I complained about; Legal Ombudsman (£200,0000)

(h) Dover capture by Kent Police in 2004 to incarcerate me in a mental hospital without due reason;

£5,000,000.

(i) capturing me at home and under handcuffs returning me to the mental hospital from where I had

lawfully absconded; (£1,000,000)

(j) pointless prosecutions of speeding offence that I was collecting money to discharge in January

2017; and booking the Speed Awareness Course in October 2022 (£1,000,000).

(k) protecting court officials who gave me an unjustified criminal record with the processing of the

speeding offence at Medway Magistrates Court; (£1,000,000)

(l) protecting the Labour Party in its hate crime of denying me my membership rights to submit

Motions, and Questions to the Prime Minister; (£1,000,000)

(m) protecting the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Conservative Prime Ministers including Mr Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak who obstructed and perverted the course of justice against the Claimant in Claim E35YM660 of the Central London County Court; (£1,000, 000)

(n) protecting the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court for thwarting justice in Claim No

Court Reference: OTP-CR-76/22; (£100,000)

(o) protecting the Norway membership of the Security Council from bringing the submissions of the

Claimant to the attention of the Security Council, the General Assembly of the United Nations and

the Secretary General of the United Nations; (£1,000,000)

(p) protecting Wordpress.com internet service providers in unfairly and criminally suspending two of

the Claimant's Blogs https://shantanup.wordpress.com  and

(q) Framing false allegations of harassment and stalking by me against Katrina Sale, BP, IOPC, educational establishments, staff of BLM Law that it knew I had nothing to do with and that it was organised by the State Security Services within the UK and in the United States of America; false arrest and confiscation of our family computer and Mobile Phone devices. (£1,000,000).

(r) protecting criminals of bp, ASDA, Sainsburys, Moto and Tesco for denying me employment unfairly (£1000,000)

(s) protecting Lulu Publishing that disabled my book publishing programe of ‘The Allurement of

Reality without giving me a chance to rectify any errors that it found questionable on the 88 eBooks

and print books (£1,000,000)

(t) protecting PAYPAL, Santander Bank and Barclays Bank for fraudulent activities on my Bank Account, (£500,000)

(u) protecting the Samaritans, Chairty Commission and the Parliamentary and Health Service for covering up the hate crimes by Victims of Panigrahi Association, a unit of the Security Services, (£ 1000,0000).

 

Total Claimed from UK: (£18,4 million) to be negotiated, with a minimum of £10,000,000.

 

Furthermore, there has been no return of 4 seized computers, 4 USB Memory Disks, 2 Amazon tablets and 2 Mobile Phones with regard to the offences, presumably for the reason that these are being held back for renewed terrorism despite the promise to return these to us as linked here: https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/stalking-charge-refused-clarification-on-malicious-communcation-charge-sought-from-kent-police 

____________________________________________________________________

12.29 pm (UK-Time) 9 January 2024

 

Auto-Reply

Inbox

 

from:     KentCPO <KentCPO@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:      9 Jan 2024, 18:47

subject: Auto-Reply

mailed-by:           justice.gov.uk

Signed by:           justice.gov.uk

security:                Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

Thank you for your email.

We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.

Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.

Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.

If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.

Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/

Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you

Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals planning and preparations

 

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

____________________________________________________________________

DID I DERIVE THE WRONG INTERPRETATION OF DC FIELD'S SILENCE

 

from:     Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:      9 Jan 2024, 18:47

subject: RE: DID I DERIVE THE WRONG INTERPRETATION OF DC FIELD'S SILENCE

mailed-by:           justice.gov.uk

Signed by:           justice.gov.uk

security:                Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.

 

Thank You

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

____________________________________________________________________

17 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660 Inbox from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> to:          constitution@parliament.uk, pacac@parliament.uk cc:         Central London DJSKEL <centr

zoom: no help forthcoming

zoom Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Forz Khan Khan Tue, 21 May at 11:50 Dear Forz Thank you for your email this morning: I have done what you asked me to do: https:/

Automatic reply: VALID CASE

Automatic reply: VALID CASE Inbox from:    Technical Advice <technical.advice@legalombudsman.org.uk> to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> date:     21 May 2024, 11:04 subject:

Comments


bottom of page