top of page
Search

Fw: Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

Fw: Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

 

reply-to:              "shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com" <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     18 Feb 2024, 19:22

subject:               Fw: Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

mailed-by:         gmail.com

 

Dear Amulya Nayak

 

The proceedings on which you sent me two What's App texts today are undergoing Quality Assurance processing at North Kent Magistrates Court currently following the failure of the Circuit Judge at the Central London County Court to respond positively to the communication below.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

 

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

 

----- Forwarded message -----

Cc:

Sent: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 14:56

Subject: Fw: Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

 

 

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

 

----- Forwarded message -----

From: "Shantanu Panigrahi" <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

To: "Enquiries Kent" <enquiries@kent.police.uk>

Cc: "Central London DJSKEL" <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

Sent: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 at 9:14

Subject: Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

To

Kent Police

 

Dear Sirs

 

I followed up DC Fields instructions to me to contact Medway Police Station in respect of the linked communications just now to have clarified which of the items taken from us over the past two years in connection with Stalking/Harassment and Malicious communications matter of alleged offences as linked here: Charge Refused Certificate from Kent Police and the Restoration of Seized Property (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/charge-refused-certificate-from-kent-police-and-the-restoration-of-seized-property and dialled 101 for Kent Police, but could not get an answer from the operator, especially on the issue of whether the Bail to Medway Police Station that I was obliged by law to attend on 15 March 2024 remains in place, in light of the proceedings linked here: Continuing problems filing Company Tax Returns for The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/continuing-problems-filing-company-tax-returns-for-the-conservative-libertarian-publications-limited

 

My wife who is the sole owner of the property taken from us has asked me to obtain this clarification first before I go to Medway Police Station to collect the items.

 

Your attention would be most useful so that we can bring this matter to a closure now.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

____________________________________________________________________

Auto-Reply

Inbox

 

from:    KentCPO <KentCPO@justice.gov.uk>

date:     18 Feb 2024, 19:23

subject:               Auto-Reply

mailed-by:         justice.gov.uk

Signed by:          justice.gov.uk

security:              Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

Thank you for your email.

 

We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.

Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.

Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.

If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.

Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/

Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you

Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals planning and preparations

 

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

11 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660 Inbox from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> to:          constitution@parliament.uk, pacac@parliament.uk cc:         Central London DJSKEL <centr

zoom: no help forthcoming

zoom Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Forz Khan Khan Tue, 21 May at 11:50 Dear Forz Thank you for your email this morning: I have done what you asked me to do: https:/

Automatic reply: VALID CASE

Automatic reply: VALID CASE Inbox from:    Technical Advice <technical.advice@legalombudsman.org.uk> to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> date:     21 May 2024, 11:04 subject:

Comments


bottom of page