top of page
Search

J00ME572 Proceedings associated with E35YM660 and HQ17X01773

J00ME572 Proceedings associated with E35YM660 and HQ17X01773

Yahoo

/

Inbox

Contactcentre <contactcentre@sra.org.uk>

To:

shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com

Thu, 28 Jul at 13:19


Dear Dr Shantanu Panigrahi,

Thank you for your email of 27 July 2022.

If you have a specific question that we can help with, please Contact us and we will be happy to assist you.

When copied into an email with several other recipients we will not respond in any other way.

Did my response help you today?

Please let me know if my response helped you today by clicking the feedback button below.



It should take you less than two minutes to complete, and we review all feedback that we receive.

Yours sincerely

Rebecca Frizzell

Customer Services Adviser

Contact Centre

Solicitors Regulation Authority

0370 606 2555

contactcentre@sra.org.uk

www.sra.org.uk


From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

Sent: 27 July 2022 07:08


To: Enquiries Medway County; Enquiries Kent; enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk; Northkent; otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int; Eastkentmc; maidstonecrowncourt; Central London DJSKEL; Civil Appeals - Registry; registry@supremecourt.uk; PCC Correspondence Kent; Contactcentre; omar.sagher@governmentlegal.gov.uk; CPSContact; QB Judges Listing Office; Vikki Randall; CATLIS Long (LONG CATLIS ROAD SURGERY); Enquiries; correspondence@attorneygeneral.gov.uk; registry@jcpc.uk; ccmcce-filing@justice.gov.uk; Professional Ethics Advice Service; Sivaji Panesar; Marty Caine; Nitin Bhardwaj; egregious_c@yahoo.com; a.westby@greenwich.ac.uk; People Relations UK; resourcingteam@tesco.com; hrssorg@asda.co.uk; CBSL HR; Human Resources (Sainsburys); aldisupport@vacancyfiller.co.uk; Ray Coker; Orla Scanlan

Subject: J00ME572 Proceedings associated with E35YM660 and HQ17X01773

Attachments: ToCrownProsecutionService(Records)26Jul2022.docx


Dear Sirs

I was contacted by the Complaints Division of the Crown Prosecution Service yesterday to which I replied to the best of my knowledge and resources available being a person in litigant: ToCrownProsecutionService(Records)26Jul2022


It is clear that wherever I take my complaints to I meet up against a blank wall of silence or worse the shoving of paperwork from one institution of the State to another without any kind of resolution of the dispute where the University of Greenwich still owes me £55,000 in severance payments from the untimely and unceremonious dismissal from my employment in 1998; and subsequent similar experiences elsewhere.


If there is to be no judicial input into the proceedings, the Police Force in Kent Police will go scot-free and there would have been no avenues to protest against its terroristic activities against ordinary citizens going about their lawful business in society. That would not bode well for the State of the United Kingdom that I otherwise love to live in.


This is my final representation to the State authorities to issue Judgment that has been long time coming and it must be in writing with full written reasons issued to me before the 27 October 2022, 10.00 am Hearing at Medway County Court that has not yet been delisted by the Court (kindly clarify).


Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619


For information on how we handle your personal data, see our privacy notice.

This email is intended for the addressee only. This includes any attachments. Its unauthorised use, further processing, storage or copying is not allowed. If you are not the intended recipient, please let the sender know and then destroy all copies.

Please note the sender is not authorised to conclude any contract on behalf of the Solicitors Regulation Authority by email.

We are the regulator of solicitors and law firms in England and Wales. The Solicitors Regulation Authority Limited is a company limited by guarantee. Our registered offices are: The Cube, 199 Wharfside Street, Birmingham, B1 1RN. Our company registration number is: 12608059.


Attachment:

ToCrownProsecutionService(Records)26Jul2022.docx 16.3kB:

RE: External Email - Fw: UPDATE ON CLAIM j00ME5722

Yahoo

/

Sent

Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To:

South East VRR and Complaints Crown Prosecution Service

Tue, 26 Jul at 13:23

Dear Sir

There has been extensive Judicial manipulation of proceedings against me in the Injunction that I sought against Kent Police (see attached: Document_2022-05-1552026.pdf across all levels of civil and criminal jurisdictions of the State from Maidstone Crown Court, East Kent Magistrates Court, North Kent Magistrates Court, the Central London County Court, the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court not to mention the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in relation to my petition to Her Majesty the Queen to resolve this endemic institutional racism. This is exemplified in the following link: Running Commentary on Claim J00ME572: 18.42 pm (UK-Time) 25 July 2022 (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/running-commentary-on-claim-j00me572-18-42-pm-uk-time-25-july-2022 that the Medway County Court and the Central London County Court have ignored. There is still uncertainty on whether any of the above courts have jurisdiction to impose Injuctions against the Policing methods used by the Police and whether the victim can sue the Police for wrongful arrest and retention of seized computer devices that Kent Police did from our house on 24 November 2022 under clearly false pretences.


Accordingly, there is no point in me attending the Hearing of the 27 October 2027, 10.00 am at Medway County Court any longer.


I just wished to place this on record at the Crown Prosecution Service when the matter comes up for a Judge's deliberations in due course.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619


Hide original message

On Tuesday, 26 July 2022 at 12:19:43 BST, South East VRR and Complaints <southeastvrrandcomplaints@cps.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

Thank you for contacting the South East Victims’ Right to Review and Complaints Unit

Your correspondence regarding a hearing scheduled at the Medway County Court on 27 October 2022 does not fall within our Feedback and Complaints Policy. I have provided a link to our policy for your information: https://www.cps.gov.uk/feedback-and-complaints

Apologies that we cannot assist you any further.

Kind Regards,

South East Victims’ Right to Review and Complaints Unit

South East | Crown Prosecution Service

www.cps.gov.uk/south-east

This email is private and is intended only for the addressee and any copy recipients. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply email and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy.


From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

Sent: 22 July 2022 07:34

To: South East VRR and Complaints <SouthEastVRRandcomplaints@cps.gov.uk>

Cc: Enquiries Medway County <enquiries.medway.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>; Enquiries Kent <enquiries@kent.police.uk>; Orla Scanlan <orla.scanlan@blmlaw.com>; Dizum Nobody <nobody@dizum.com>

Subject: Re: External Email - Fw: UPDATE ON CLAIM j00ME572


Caution – this email originated outside your organisation.

Do not click on any links or attachments unless you recognise the sender, their email address and know the email is safe to open.

Find out how to identify phishing and suspicious emails by viewing the related intranet pages

Dear Sir

In respect of the Hearing announced at Medway County Court on 27 October 2022 at 10.00 am to consider the actions of Kent Police and MI5 over the past decade of highly corrupt practices through lately BLM Law as attached: FREE FROM THE CLUTCHES OF THE DEMON AT LAST.pdf, kindly oblige with an interim report so that I am well fortified in front of the Judge when it comes to it.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

Defendant to the allegations of harassment against Katrina Sale and staff of BLM Law through email communications.

Claimant or damages and compensation from Kent Police for the Hate Crime overseen by the Chief Constable Alan Pughesley

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619


On Thursday, 21 July 2022 at 13:45:04 BST, South East VRR and Complaints <southeastvrrandcomplaints@cps.gov.uk> wrote:

Thank you for contacting the South East Area of the Crown Prosecution Service.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) is the main prosecuting authority in England and Wales. The CPS has 14 Areas across the country, each headed by a Chief Crown Prosecutor and the South East Area is responsible for prosecuting cases in Kent, Surrey and Sussex only.

Please note that if you have previously been advised that the CPS cannot provide assistance to you and your query does not raise any new issues, we will not be able to provide any further response.

If your enquiry does not relate to the CPS, we will be unable to provide a response, but may be able to provide contact details for the relevant agency or organisation.


*********************************************************************

This e-mail is private and is intended only for the addressee and any copy recipients. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy.

Activity and use of departmental systems and the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes.

______________________________________________________________________

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

____________________________________________________________________

*********************************************************************

This e-mail is private and is intended only for the addressee and any copy recipients. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy.


Activity and use of departmental systems and the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes.

____________________________________________________________________

Attachment:

Document_2022-05-13_152026.pdf 5.9MB

Letter from Medway County Court received on 13 May 2022


Page 1 of 5

Notice of Issue

(non-money claim)


In the County Court at Medway

Claim Number J00ME572

Claimant: Shantanu Panigrahi

Defendant: Hugh Pughesley

Issue Fee: £332


Your Claim was issued on 29 April 2022

The court sent it to the defendant by first class post on 12/05/22 and it will be deemed served on 16/05/22. The defendant has until 30/05/22 to reply.


Notes for guidance

*The claim form and the particulars of claim, if served separately, must be served on the defendant within 4 months of the date of issue (6 months if you are serving outside England and Wales). You may be able to apply to extend the time for serving the claim form but the application must generally be made before the 4 month or 6 month period expires.

* You must inform the court immediately if your claim is settled or discontinued.

The defendant may

• Admit the truth of the whole or any part of your claim. The cout will send you a copy of the defendant’s admission and tell you what to do next.

• File an acknowledge of service. This will allow the defendant 28 days from the date of service of your particulars of claim to file a defence or contest the court’s jurisdiction.

• Dispute the whole claim. The court will send you a copy of the defence.

• Not reply at all. You may make an application to the court for judgment. A fee may be payable.

____________________________________________________________________

The Court Office at the County Court at Medway, Medway Civil and Family Court, The Court House, The Brook, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4JZ. When corresponding with the court, please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the claim number. Tel: 01634 887900 Fax: 0870 324 0175. Check if you can issue your claim online. It will save you time and money. Go to www.moneyclaim.gov.uk to find out more.


N205C Notice of Issue (non money claim)

Produced by: Joana Apetri

CJR179


(Page 2 of 5):

n16a-engInjuctionagainstKentPolice.pdf 432.4kB

Application for Injunction

(General Form)

Name of court Claim No. Medway County Court J00ME572

Claimant's Name and Ref. Shantanu Panigrahi

Defendant's Name and Ref. Kent Police

Fee Account no. HWF-9K4-EYL/HQ17X01773


Sealed: The County Court

Notes on completion

Tick which boxes apply and specify the legislation where appropriate

By application in pending proceedings Yes

Under Statutory provision Yes

This application is made under Part 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules Yes

Seal

This application raises issues under the Human Rights Act 1998 Yes No Yes

The Claimant(1)

(1) Enter the full name of the person making the application applies to the court for an injunction order in the following terms: Shantanu Panigrahi

The Defendant(2)

(2) Enter the full name of the person the injunction is to be directed to: Chief Constable of Kent Police, Hugh Pughesley must stop investigating the Claimant for any

offences that it has kept secret from the Claimant after 6 months of (assessment without an explanation to the Claimant

3) Set out any proposed (3) rders requiring acts to

be done. Delete if no mandatory order is sought.

The Defendant be forbidden (whether by himself or by instructing or encouraging or permitting

any other person)(4) The Chief Constable of Kent Police was served due notice by way of an arrest warrant issued that its harassment and intrusion into the private life of the Claimant constituted a Hate Crime against him

(4) Set out here the proposed terms of the injunction order (if the defendant is a limited company delete the wording in brackets and insert 'whether by its servants, agents, officers

or otherwise'). And that(5) The Claimant took out civil proceedings and criminal proceedings again Kent Police.

(5) Set out here any further terms asked for including provision for costs The grounds of this application are set out in the written evidence of(6) (6) Enter the names of al

persons who have sworn affidavits or signed statements in support of this application sworn (signed) on The Defendndant kept secret the full circumstances of the 1500 criminal anonymous emails received by the Claimant.

This written evidence is served with this application.

This application is to be served upon(7)

(7) Enter the names and addresses of all persons upon whom it is intended to serve this application This application is filed by(8) Hugh Pughesley, Chief Constable of Kent Police, Sutton Road, Maidstone, Kent.

(8) Enter the full name and address for service and delete as required

(the Solicitors for) the Claimant (Applicant/Petitioner) Claimant: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi, 3 Hoath Lane, Wigmore, Gillingham, Kent ME8 0SL. United Kingdom.

whose address for service is Signed Dated 7 April 2022

To* This section to be completed by the court *

Name and address of the person application is directed to of


This application will be heard by the (District) Judge

at

on the day of 20 at o'clock

If you do not attend at the time shown the court may make an injunction order in your absence

If you do not fully understand this application you should go to a Solicitor, Legal Advice Centre or a Citizens' Advice Bureau

The court office at

is open between 10am and 4pm Mon - Fri. When corresponding with the court, please address all forms and letters to the Court Manager and quote the claim number.

N16A General form of application for injunction (05.14) © Crown copyright 2014


(Page 3 of 5):


DEFENCE STATEMENT ON HARASSMENT OFFENCE

1. I have never ever sent an email from a Remailer, Austria anonymous email account, or a Nomen Nescio Account, or some other dizum account, or another anonymous email account to anyone whether an official at a government institution, or a private individual.

2. I have received hundreds of emails into my Gmail Phone Account from people like 38 Degrees, Internet Archive, and others which did not appear in my Desktop Gmail Account.

3. I have not sent any emails that has harassed anyone from my Shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com account: hundreds appear to have been sent to people involved with the organisation Victims of Panigrahi Association but clearly my Shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com account was highjacked to get me into legal difficulties with the Central London County Court in respect of Claim E35YM660.

4. My shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk was bastardised by trolls and criminals so I could not send out any emails from this Account and had to abandon it a year ago. Any emails sent from this account was done by Victims of Panigrahi Association associated trolls and criminals.

5. All my purposeful emails and I have sent out thousands over the past 20 years were legitimate court-associated legal proceedings in relation to ME010463, ME002953, HQ17X01773, and E35YM660.

6. Whenever a particular recipient of an email from me asked me not to send them any emails, I complied with the request unless court proceedings became prejudiced from my inaction.

7. Since I started my E35YM660 Claim against the Prime Minister and Victims of Panigrahi Association for its criminal anonymous emails to me notably from Sivaji Panesar, Marty Caine, Nitin Bhardwaj, Fritz Wueler, Cherie, Egregious_C, and others like Ed Mulhouse and Monneka Tahir, there was a systematic attempt to have me booted out of this country to places like Pakistan, because I was bringing Kent Police in a £5 million pound damages and compensation Claim in the High Court Queens Bench Division and brought the Crown Prosecution Service to East Kent Magistrates Court on a criminal charge of perverting the course of justice and obstructing justice. That is why I considered that the UK State through its Security Services had wanted to frame charges against me of forensic or criminal nature to have me incarcerated in a mental hospital for a third time or worse to get me committed to a Trial that the County Court in Central London arranged in a Pre-Trial Hearing but I was exonerated. I told my Consultant Psychiatrist that come what may I will never leave the United Kingdom, and this is the reason that Kent Police is charging me with a concocted summons for Harassment that is not specified to leave the State room for elaboration later. This is done to protect the Central London County Court from having to pass judgment or Order to my Appeal Application which the Court would have to justify that the University of Greenwich was lawful in withholding my £55,000 severance payment.

(Signed)

S.Panigrahi

5.28 pm 15 Sep 2021


(Page 4 of 5):

Claim Form

In the


Claim No J00ME572

Issue Date: 29/04/22/


Sealed The County Court

Claimant’s Name and address including postcode:

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL


Defendant’s Name and Address including postcode:

Kent Police

Grugeon House,

Police Headquarters,

Sutton Road,

Maidstone

Kent ME15 9BZ


Brief details of claim:

This Claim is for compensation and damages suffered by me as the Claimant as a result of Kent Police’s inaction and actions that has caused me much suffering since 2004.


Value

£100,000 up to £5 million


Preferred County Court Hearing Centre:


Defendants Name and address for service including postcode:

Kent Police

Grugeon House,

Police Headquarters,

Sutton Road,

Maidstone

Kent ME15 9BZ

Amount Claimed: £100, 000.00

Court Fee: £4,500.00

Total amount: £104,500.00


(Page 5 0f 5):

Does this Claim have any issues of interest in the Human Rights Act: Yes


Particulars of Claim: (attached/to follow):

This Claim is brought to the High Court against Kent Police and co-conspirators (officials in Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service, Lawyers, the Legal Ombudsman and the Independent Police Complaints Commission) against the following chargesheet against this Police Force:

(a) protecting criminals on my submission of Internet Complaint hate crime;

(b) protecting criminals on the Shell Tribunal matter;

(c) protecting criminals in the UKIP proceedings matter;

(d) protecting criminals in the Greenwich Legalities matter;

(e) protecting criminals in the National Health Service directed crimes against me;

(f) protecting criminals in the AuthorhouseUK book publication matter;

(g) protecting the Legal Ombudsman from criminal activities against me with regard to several lawyers that I complained about;

(h) Dover capture by Kent Police in 2004 to incarcerate me in a mental hospital without due reason.

(i) capturing me at home and under handcuffs returning me to the mental hospital from where I had lawfully absconded;

(j) pointless prosecution of speeding offence that I was collecting money to discharge in January 2017;

(k) protecting court officials who gave me an unjustified criminal record with the processing of the speeding offence at Medway Magistrates Court;

(l) protecting the Labour Party in its hate crime of denying me my membership rights to submit Motions, and Questions to the Prime Minister.


Statement of Truth:

I believe that the facts stated in these particulars of claim are true

Full Name: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

Signature

____________________________________________________________________

J00ME572 Proceedings associated with E35YM660 and HQ17X017732

Yahoo

/

Sent

Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To:

contactcentre@sra.org.uk

Thu, 28 Jul at 13:49


Dear Solicitors Regulation Authority


Please review in light of the attachment that you have sent me whether there is now sufficient regulatory evidence of highly deceitful and corrupt practices at BLM Law and its associate Clyde Law in its threatened Pre-action Protocol on me in its front provided by the State of the United Kingdom to cover up endemic institutional racism in the Judicial and Law Enforcement processes.


If you require additional information as proof of lies and manipulation to legally rubber-stamp what these institutions had decided as long ago as 2000 when my petition to Her Majesty was submitted, but got sent on a merry-go-round by the then Lord Chancellor Lord Irvine of Lairg and is still stuck in some unknown institution of the State such as with the current Attorney General advising the Prime Minister. You can open a file with a Reference number today and we can then discuss it further.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent

ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619


Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 13:19, Contactcentre<Contactcentre@sra.org.uk> wrote:


Dear Dr Shantanu Panigrahi,iei


Thank you for your email of 27 July 2022.

If you have a specific question that we can help with, please Contact us and we will be happy to assist you.

When copied into an email with several other recipients we will not respond in any other way.

Did my response help you today?

Please let me know if my response helped you today by clicking the feedback button below.




It should take you less than two minutes to complete, and we review all feedback that we receive.

Yours sincerely

Rebecca Frizzell

Customer Services Adviser

Contact Centre

Solicitors Regulation Authority

0370 606 2555

contactcentre@sra.org.uk

www.sra.org.uk


From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

Sent: 27 July 2022 07:08

To: Enquiries Medway County; Enquiries Kent; enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk; Northkent; otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int; Eastkentmc; maidstonecrowncourt; Central London DJSKEL; Civil Appeals - Registry; registry@supremecourt.uk; PCC Correspondence Kent; Contactcentre; omar.sagher@governmentlegal.gov.uk; CPSContact; QB Judges Listing Office; Vikki Randall; CATLIS Long (LONG CATLIS ROAD SURGERY); Enquiries; correspondence@attorneygeneral.gov.uk; registry@jcpc.uk; ccmcce-filing@justice.gov.uk; Professional Ethics Advice Service; Sivaji Panesar; Marty Caine; Nitin Bhardwaj; egregious_c@yahoo.com; a.westby@greenwich.ac.uk; People Relations UK; resourcingteam@tesco.com; hrssorg@asda.co.uk; CBSL HR; Human Resources (Sainsburys); aldisupport@vacancyfiller.co.uk; Ray Coker; Orla Scanlan

Subject: J00ME572 Proceedings associated with E35YM660 and HQ17X01773

Attachments: ToCrownProsecutionService(Records)26Jul2022.docx


Dear Sirs


I was contacted by the Complaints Division of the Crown Prosecution Service yesterday to which I replied to the best of my knowledge and resources available being a person in litigant: ToCrownProsecutionService(Records)26Jul2022


It is clear that wherever I take my complaints to I meet up against a blank wall of silence or worse the shoving of paperwork from one institution of the State to another without any kind of resolution of the dispute where the University of Greenwich still owes me £55,000 in severance payments from the untimely and unceremonious dismissal from my employment in 1998; and subsequent similar experiences elsewhere.


If there is to be no judicial input into the proceedings, the Police Force in Kent Police will go scot-free and there would have been no avenues to protest against its terroristic activities against ordinary citizens going about their lawful business in society. That would not bode well for the State of the United Kingdom that I otherwise love to live in.


This is my final representation to the State authotiries to issue Judgment that has been long time coming and it must be in writing with full written reasons issued to me before the 27 October 2022, 10.00 am Hearing at Medway County Court that has not yet been delisted by the Court (kindly clarify).


Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619


For information on how we handle your personal data, see our privacy notice.

This email is intended for the addressee only. This includes any attachments. Its unauthorised use, further processing, storage or copying is not allowed. If you are not the intended recipient, please let the sender know and then destroy all copies.

Please note the sender is not authorised to conclude any contract on behalf of the Solicitors Regulation Authority by email.

We are the regulator of solicitors and law firms in England and Wales. The Solicitors Regulation Authority Limited is a company limited by guarantee. Our registered offices are: The Cube, 199 Wharfside Street, Birmingham, B1 1RN. Our company registration number is: 12608059.

___________________________________________________________________

5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Re: Auto-Reply: The legal establishment serving the people

Re: Auto-Reply Inbox from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> to:          ComplaintsTeam <ComplaintsTeam@sra.org.uk>, contactus@barstandardsboard.org.uk, Enquiries <enquiries@legalom

Progress in Complaint CO/999/23

Progress in Complaint CO/999/23 Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Mish Muchemwa DS 46014005 Cc:Reform Party,Partyreg,Jane Ringham Thu, 25 Apr at 07:24 To DC Mish Mushem

bottom of page