top of page
Search

RE: [CPF] Members Debate 2021 2 - new submission

RE: [CPF] Members Debate 2021 2 - new submission3

Yahoo

/

Sent

Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To:

CPF (Conservative Policy Forum)

Cc:

rehman.chishti.mp@parliament.uk, omar.sagher@governmentlegal.gov.uk, Central London DJSKEL County Court

Fri, 13 Jan at 18:45


Dear CPF


Thank you for your feedback on the New Ideas Submission of mine. I fully appreciate the points that you have raised. The idea needs a considerable amount of work to get it into shape for a new policy initiative.


Currently, the Party needs to focus on the 5 priority issues carefully selected by our Leader and the Cabinet as outlined in the Prime Ministers New Years address to the nation. I fully see the need for delaying my concept note until after the next general election in two years time or sooner as the Prime Minister decides.


I have put my tentative ideas accordingly to the back-burner and will do as you say with other Party Members in the CPF.


I am glad that our differences in what had led me to form the outfit of Conservative Libertarians is now settled and we can look forward to a good relationship from now onwards. I will support Rt Honourable Rehman Chishti MP in the next general election and withdraw my old demands for him to be deselected for party unity must come first.


The Court of Central London is accordingly advised that Claim E35YM660 has well and truly been settled and that there is no need for the Hearing of 20 January 2023 in relation to the attached Notice of hearing of Application: CenLonCty(NOTICE OF HEARING OF APPLICATION).pdf


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL



Hide original message

On Friday, 13 January 2023 at 15:07:16 GMT, CPF <cpf@conservatives.com> wrote:


Thank you for your submission. Apologies for the delayed response, owing to staff absence over the past month.


You have set out a theme, but it is not clear that you have actually presented a specific proposal. As it is, any policymaker reading your submission will not know what specific action you wish them to undertake. Whereas, the CPF is intended for the development of specific government policy proposals.


We would encourage you to discuss your ideas with your local CPF group (or other Conservative friends) and resubmit if you and they develop a clearer idea for implementation.


Thank you for being part of the CPF community,


John.


From: shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com

Sent: 03 January 2023 10:46

To: CPF <CPF@conservatives.com>

Subject: [CPF] Members Debate 2021 2 - new submission


Message Details:

Email: shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com

Policy Category: Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Policy title *: Balance between Nature and Liberty


Statement of Problem *: This is a general theme on how Conservatives could balance the need for conservation of Nature with the Libertarian spirit of freedom, free market and free trade. In the past decade climate change has leapt up the ladder of sustainable environmental management that requires a balance approach to macroeconomics and microeconomics in government. The Policy Forum could assist this process by forming a sub-group among the Conservative and Unionist Party that I would call Conservative Libertarians whose role would be to formulate general ideas that would be greener and work towards a Net Zero Carbon policy by 2050.


Proposal *: To adopt a economic framework that is efficient and sustainable within the limits of the environment.


Objectives & expected long-term impact: To develop macro and micro strategies in the field of Nature and Rural Development as well as Urban infrastructure to make the nation steady as she goes with a safety first principle in policy terms for the environment. The long-term impact of Conservative Libertarianism will work out best when it is the central focus of government and make for a pleasant Nature within the 25 year target.


Supporting evidence or experience of others & potential unintended consequences: These ideas as the central focus of a Conservative government have not been tried elsewhere but the refocusing that would take place would be highly beneficial to economic development in a sustainable long-term basis when the environment and economics go forward in a balanced manner. It would be a win-win approach with no unintended consequences.


Cost and costing rationale: There are no fixed costs to the rationale as a policy: it is just a change in the mind-set of the government that it adopts a economic-environment strategy.


Mechanism for evaluation: The success of the approach to government that balances economics within the natural world will be measurable in terms of the regeneration of rural areas and wild life introduction; use of energy-saving devices, use of renewable materials, and reducing unemployment by getting people to work in Nature with the cooperation of industry. Technologies will be developed in a measurable manner.


Promotion of vision, values and principles: Conservatives stand for liberty, and for preservation: the balanced approach will retain the free-market basis but will make the country self-sufficient that Brexit requires but on more of a greener basis.


This email and any attachments to it (the 'Email') are intended for a specific recipient(s) and its contents may be confidential, privileged and/or otherwise protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this Email in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone or email, and delete it from your records. You must not disclose, distribute, copy or otherwise use this Email. Please note that email is not a secure form of communication and that the Conservative Party ('the Party') is not responsible for loss arising from viruses contained in this Email nor any loss arising from its receipt or use. Any opinion expressed in this Email is not necessarily that of the Party and may be personal to the sender.

Join the Conservatives today and help secure a brighter future for Britain: https://www.conservatives.com/join

Leave a gift in your Will – be proud to protect your Party: http://www.conservativefoundation.co.uk/

Promoted by Alan Mabbutt on behalf of the Conservative and Unionist Party, both at 4 Matthew Parker Street, London, SW1H 9HQ


Attachment

CenLonCtyCrtNOTICEOFHEARINGOFAPPLICATION.pdf 3.6MB:

Notice of Hearing of Application

In the County Court at Central London

Claim Number E35YM660

Date: 13 December 2022


DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref

MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1st Defendant Ref Z1819776/MMX HO19


The hearing of the claimant’s application dated 23.06.2022 ? (2021?)

Will take place at 10.00 AM on the 20 January 2023 at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts Of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.


Time Estimate 1 hour IN PERSON before a Circuit Judge


LISTING POLICY: The court’s listing policy is determined by the senior judge and implemented by staff in accordance with his directions. Your case may not be allocated to a judge until the day of the hearing, and may have to wait in the unassigned list until a judge becomes available to hear it. Every effort will be made to ensure that your case is heard at this or another convenient court. If it is not possible to provide a judge to hear your case, the court and Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service will not be responsible for any costs incurred in the absence of any departure from listing policy due to maladministration.


Parties should be aware that this case may be one of several cases that have been listed to commence at this time. This may mean that your case will not be called immediately at the time scheduled, but may be heard later in the day. We will try to ensure that if your case is listed in the moring it is heard by 1 pm and if your case is listed in the afternoon it is heard by 4 pm. In some cicrcumstances it is possible that your hearing could overrun. You and any witnesses should therefore be available until the end of these periods or even later.


If there are special reasons why this is invonvenient you may make a short notice application to a circuit judge to adjourn. Ordinary inconvenience arising from the fact of being in the unassigned list will not be sufficient reason for an adjournment, nor will the fact that both parties agree to an adjournement.

ACCESSIBILITY: Please inform us as soon as possible if you, your witnesses or legal representatives have a physical disability that may affect your attendance at this court. We can make alternative arrangements for the case to be heard in a suitable court room by calling the Customer Service Team on 0300 123 3577.

FILING OF SKELETON ARGUMENTS AND TRIAL BUNDLES: Trial bundles (if applicable) should be lodged no earlier than 3 working days before the trial (unless otherwise ordered). All trial bundles should be

. emailing RCJ.DCO@justice.gov.uk , or centrallondoncounty.dco@justice.gov.uk

. phoning our Disability Contact Officer 0207 947 6063.


To help us provide the best help and support, you should try to explain how your disability affects you and give as much information as you can. This will help our staff or the judge to consider what you’ll need to do during your case and any help we can provide. Our staff will always talk with you and agree any reasonable adjustments you need.

(TRUNCATED)


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent

ME8 0SL

____________________________________________________________________

Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

To:

Shantanu Panigrahi

Fri, 13 Jan at 18:46


Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.

Thank You

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

____________________________________________________________________

Automatic reply: [CPF] Members Debate 2021 2 - new submission

Yahoo

/

Inbox

CPF <cpf@conservatives.com>

To:

Shantanu Panigrahi

Fri, 13 Jan at 18:46

Thank you for contacting the CPF. If you are interested in receiving information about local and national CPF policy discussions and events, then please register your interest via our website, at conservativepolicyforum.com/sign-up

If you have sent your response to one of the CPF consultations, then these should usually be directed to our designated email address to avoid any risk of delay in your response being processed: CPF.papers@conservatives.com - however, your submission has been received and we appreciate your participation, so there is no need to resend it, thank you.

If you are reporting a data breach or submitting a Rights Request, please resend your email to dataprotection@conservatives.com

Owing to staff absence for two weeks either side of Christmas, please do not expect a response to your message until the New Year.




8 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Re: Request for Internal Review of FOI/01299/22/AS Yahoo / Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com> To: Sheffield Road (Jo of the Samaritans) Cc: vex.litigation@governmentlegal.gov.uk, a.westb

bottom of page