top of page
Search

Shantanu Panigrahi || Design Your App ||

Shantanu Panigrahi || Design Your App ||

Inbox


from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to: priyanshrai534@gmail.com,

pkazeem <pkazeem@martintolhurst.co.uk>,

thesupportcentre@lawsociety.org.uk,

complaintsreview@cedr.com

date: 13 Jun 2023, 20:14

subject: Fwd: Shantanu Panigrahi || Design Your App ||

mailed-by: gmail.com


---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 20:08

Subject: Re: Shantanu Panigrahi || Design Your App ||

To: Priyansh Rai <priyanshrai534@gmail.com>

Cc: pkazeem <pkazeem@martintolhurst.co.uk>, <thesupportcentre@lawsociety.org.uk>, <complaintsreview@cedr.com>



Dear Priyansh Rai


I do have a website and in fact several that I am developing in my continuing philanthropic mission of developing knowledge for world conservation. But my studies of Humanology are not completed as yet to help me build my business with your assistance.


For example, if you take some time to examine this reply from Tolhurst Solicitors: Final Resolution (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/final-resolution-3 to my application for assistance as linked here: Final Resolution (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/final-resolution-2 it would appear to be a deceitfully uncooperative way of conducting business, and this kind of responses I have had with over 70 law firms over the past 26 years. I had clearly said to pkazeem that there was a Claim in progress for £40 million in damages and compensation against the UK Treasury, so why repeat the same message again of contacting the Law Society, especially since I had already written to the Law Society complaining about the manner in which Solicitors operate their businesses to the detriment of deserving applicants as in my case. The issue of Duty Solicitor Scheme in police stations I said to the Solicitors Regulation Authority was a structural problem that required regulatory intervention by the government, but it did not see it that way so that the dispute rumbles on: see attached: ToOlivesSolicitors(Bail18JunMeetingICC13Jun2023.docx


When my studies are completed I will contact you for your prices and developmental facilities that would enhance the scope of my philanthropy: one might be forgiven to think we here in the United Kingdom are a nation of morons in a Police State, and it is contagious towards the rest of humanity.


I hope this is acceptable to you for the time being..


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619



On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 12:56, Priyansh Rai <priyanshrai534@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello ,


We are a website and mobile application development agency.


Would you be interested in building your business web and mobile application?


Waiting for your next response.


Regards,

Priyansh Rai


One attachment

• Scanned by Gmail

ToOlivesSolicitors(Bail18JunMeetingICC13Jun2023.docx


ToOlivesSolicitors(Bail18JuneMeetingICCproceedings)13Jun2023
.docx
Download DOCX • 15KB

13 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

LegalVision | Unable to Assist with Enquiry

LegalVision | Unable to Assist with Enquiry Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Standards Officer Liberal Democrats Mon, 17 Jun at 11:27 To The Standards Officer Liberal

LegalVision | Unable to Assist with Enquiry

LegalVision | Unable to Assist with Enquiry Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Labour Membership Mon, 17 Jun at 11:36 Dear Sir/Madam I have waited long enough for an exp

コメント


bottom of page