top of page
Search

Appeal at the Court of Appeal (E35YM660 & J00ME572 combination)

Appeal at the Court of Appeal (E35YM660 & J00ME572 combination)

Yahoo

/

Sent

Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To:

Civil Appeals - Registry

Cc:

Central London DJSKEL County Court, Enquiries Medway County Court

Sat, 15 Apr at 07:45


To

The Court of Appeal

via the Civil Appeals Registry


Your Honour


Please note the update on the proceedings below. I have only received the attached two relevant Orders from the Central London County Court on E35YM660 currently:

(a) CentralLondonCountyCourtOrderonE35YM660 dated 19January 2021_received by Claimant first at 9.27am on22March2021.pdf;

(b) Central London County Court Order 21 June 2021 (District Judge Lightman).pdf.


I will wait till noon on Monday 17 April 2023 after this weekend (unless the Duty Judges at the two Courts can respond before then) for any final sealed Orders from the Central London County Court on E35YM660, and from Medway County Court (which has never issued a Sealed Order on J00ME572 before); and with your permission, follow the process at the Court of Appeal through the Appellant's Notice N161 that you require.


Kindly let me know the Court Fee payable for this Appeal and give me the Court's (HMCTS?) Bank Account details so that I can make the necessary Court Fee payment by Personal Bank Account transfer as you suggested.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619


Hide original message

----- Forwarded message -----

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To: Force Control Kent <force.control@kent.police.uk>; omar.sagher@governmentlegal.gov.uk <omar.sagher@governmentlegal.gov.uk>

Sent: Saturday, 15 April 2023 at 06:59:11 BST

Subject: Appeal at the Court of Appeal (E35YM660 & J00ME572 combination)


To

Kent Police

Cabinet Office, GLD (Prime Minister of the United Kingdom)


Dear Sirs


I am writing to update Kent Police and the Prime Minister of the pending considerations as linked here: Appeal at the Court of Appeal (J00ME572 of Medway County Court) (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/appeal-at-the-court-of-appeal-j00me572-of-medway-county-court-3

Appeal at the Court of Appeal (J00ME572 of Medway County Court)

Appeal at the Court of Appeal (J00ME572 of Medway County Court) Inbox from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrah...


This will be an unusual Appellant's Notice in that it combines the Claim against the Prime Minister under E35YM660 at the Central London County Court and the Claim against Kent Police under J00ME572 at the Medway County Court. The Appeal is based on my assertion that the Prime Minister and the Chief Constable of Kent Police worked in tandem to subject me to intense terrorism over the 6 years with the Victims of Panigrahi Association being the instrument of persecution on me. The reason for this terrorism is that I had sought justice in the civil and criminal courts in private litigation and private prosecution of both parties.


As the Court of Appeal has announced, it is prepared to accept my Appellant's Notice subject to an assessment at a future date on the Court's jurisdiction to hear the Case. You will note that I have asked both the Central London County Court and Medway County Court to issue me with the required final sealed orders of the two courts. If these Orders are not forthcoming, I will seek permission of the Court of Appeal to submit the Appellant's Notice without these Orders using only the HHJ Parfitt's and District Judge Lightman's Orders of January to June 2021, and the no sealed Orders from Medway County Court.


The reason that this process is justified for the Claimant to pursue is that the £7 million that I have sought as compensation with a letter of apology will have to be issued to me with the signatures of the current Prime Minister Right Honourable Rishi Sunak and the Chief Constable of Kent Police with the money claim to be equally divided between Kent Police (£3.5 million) and Cabinet Office (£3.5 million).


Should you have any queries, I will be pleased to address these.


Please acknowledge service of these Appeal proceedings by return email.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619


Download all attachments as a zip file

(a) CentralLondonCountyCourtOrderonE35YM660dated19January2021_receivedbyClaimantfirstat9.27amon22March2021-1.pdf 54.7kB

(b) CentralLondonCountyCourtOrder 21 June 2021 (District Judge Lightman).pdf 783.5kB

(a)

General Form of Judgment or Order

In the County Court at Central London

Claim Number E35YM660

Date 19 January 2021

(The County Court Sealed)


DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref

MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1ST Defendant Ref Z1819776/H019


Before His Honour Judge Parfitt sitting at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.


On the Court hearing the Appellant but the Appellant withdrawing from the telephone hearing after making his submission and on the Appellant’s request to reconsider the permission to appeal refused by HHJ Letham by Order dated 30 September 2019


IT IS ORDERED THAT

1. The request to reconsider permission is refused.

2. The Appellant;s application was totally without merit: the DDJ’s Order was wholly appropriate as a case management order and the stated grounds of appeal that the

Appellant lacked access to legal advice was hopeless and the oral argument put forward that the DDJ was a liar acting as part of a conspiracy to silence the Appellant was absurd (both in its premise and in its substance – since the order under appeal gave the Appellant a final chance to make his particulars of claim good).

3. The Respondent’s application for costs of the action must be referred to a DJ pursuant to CPR 3.5 (2)(a) and the Respondent’s letter dated 13 January 2021 and two cost schedules contained in the Appeal bundle (in pdf format) shall be treated as application in that respect.

4. The Respondent’s costs of the appeal are to be treated as Respondent’s costs in the action.


Dated 19 January 2021


In compliance with GDPR reaquirements the privacy notice sets out the standards that you can expect from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) when we process personal data about you in the context of civil court proceedings; how you can get access to a copy of your personal data; and what you can do ir you think standards are not being met. Please see link below for further information:

__________________________________________________________________________________The Court office at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.When corresponding with the court please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the Claim Number. Tel 0300 123 5577. Check if you can issue your claim online. It will save you time and money. Go to www.moneyclaim.gov.uk to find out more.

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal-information-charter#hmcts-privacy-policy


(b)

N24 General Form of Judgment or Order

Produced by L Alonso

CJR 0065C

(b)

General Form of Judgment or Order

In the County Court at Central London

Claim Number E35YM660

Date 21 June 2021

(The County Court Sealed)

DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref

MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1ST Defendant Ref Z1819776/H019

Before District Judge Lightman sitting at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.

IT IS ORDERED THAT

1. It is recorded that:

(a). The Court has sought to join the Claimant in the BT Meet Me hearing listed for today at 11.40 am. The Court telephoned at least thrice the Claimant on the telephone number given by him in his application dated 19 June 2021 as 07967789619 but the telephone was not picked up.

(b) The application dated 19 June 2021 of the Claimant to adjourn be refused.

(c) Today’s hearing is merely to assess costs. The District Judge today has no other jurisdiction.

2. The Claim Form having been struck out, judgment for the Defendant.

3. Claimant shall pay the Defendant’s costs assessed in total as £4,170 payable by 4 pm on 5 July 2021.

Dated 21 June 2021

____________________________________________________________________The Court office at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.When corresponding with the court please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the Claim Number. Tel 0300 123 5577. Check if you can issue your claim online. It will save you time and money. Go to www.moneyclaim.gov.uk to find out more.

N1 General Form of Judgment or Order

Produced by S. Mirza

CJR 005C

____________________________________________________________________

Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

To:

Shantanu Panigrahi


Sat, 15 Apr at 07:47


Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.

Thank You

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

22 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Harassment suffered by me today

Harassment suffered by me today2 Yahoo/Inbox Reed From:service.excellence@reed.com To:Shantanu Panigrahi Mon, 22 Apr at 14:22 Dear Shantanu​, Thank you for your email of 21/04/2024 informing us that y

Comments


bottom of page