top of page
Search

APPEAL FOR A RETRIAL ON THE 10 NOVEMBER 2023, 2 PM CONVICTION AND SENTENCING

APPEAL FOR A RETRIAL ON THE 10 NOVEMBER 2023, 2 PM CONVICTION AND SENTENCING

Inbox

 

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Force Control Kent <force.control@kent.police.uk>,

date:     7 May 2024, 07:49

subject:               APPEAL FOR A RETRIAL ON THE 10 NOVEMBER 2023, 2 PM CONVICTION AND SENTENCING

mailed-by:         gmail.com

 

Dear Sirs

 

This is just to inform Kent Police and the Crown Prosecution Service that an appeal is in progress citing the fullest extent of primary evidence and mitigating circumstances as set out in the attached: ToNorthKentMagistratesCourt(AdditionalTerrorismforConsiderationoftheprospectsforaRetrialonConvictionandSentencing)6May2024.docx.

 

Should you have any comments in relation to objections to the application, kindly let me know.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

 

One attachment  • Scanned by Gmail

 

ToNorthKentMagistratesCourt(AdditionalTerrorismforConsiderationoftheprospectsforaRetrialonConvictionandSentencing)6May2024.docx:

 

Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister/Chambers

Inbox

 

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Kentmc@justice.gov.uk

date:     6 May 2024, 17:26

subject:               Fwd: Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister/Chambers

mailed-by:         gmail.com

 

To

Magistrates

 

Your Honour

 

Please refer to the proceedings as linked here https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/prospects-for-a-retrial-on-10-november-2023-2-pm-trial-on-speeding-offence-of-5-october-2022 and consider the additional terrorism that has been mounted me 15 minutes ago.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi (Defendant)

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: forz khan <FK@thechambersoffkhan.co.uk>

Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 at 17:11

Subject: Re: Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister/Chambers

To: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

 

Dear Dr Panigrahi

 

Thank you for the email.

 

Please can you clarify if there are any other points that you wish to raise. If so please provide full details.

 

Kindest regards.

F. Khan.

Counsel.

Middle Temple.

Trinity 1988.

The Chambers of F. Khan, London

Direct Mobile - 07854 109 584  -  Email - FK@TheChambersofFKhan.co.uk

Regulated by The Bar Standards Board     

Confidentiality Notice

This email is confidential. If you are not the addressee do not use it at all. Instead email it back to the sender and delete it. This email and attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving. We will not be liable for any damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or any viruses being passed on.

Important Notice

All emails sent to or from this address will be received by The Chambers of F. Khan Email System and may be subject to archive and review. All email accounts hosted by The Chambers of F. Khan are corporate email accounts. These accounts and their contents remain the property of The Chambers of F. Khan. They are not personal email accounts and must not be used for the purpose of exchanging Sensitive Personal Information as defined by the Data Protection Act 1998 (1998 c29).

 

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Sent: 06 May 2024 13:52

Subject: Re: Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister/Chambers

Dear Mr Khan

1. The private prosecution of Kent Police and the Prime Minister were launched without your assistance at East Kent Magistrates Court and Maidstone Crown Court by myself directly; East Kent Magistrates Court considered the original issue of summons on the Chief Constable of Kent Police and issued a Judgment that I had not provided sufficient clarification or information on the matter. I appealed but could not find the Case Number on which the summons was decided because Kent Police had seized all our computers and USB Memory Disks at the time containing those details. Then I got diverted by incessant criminal anonymous emails that were fired at me, my associates in the United Kingdom including my wife, and relatives in India. I took out an injunction against the Chief Constable of Kent Police to stop the Police Force terrorising me with arrests from 15 September 2021 onwards together with a Money Claims but due to procedural problems arising from my lack of expertise the Medway County Court stopped responding to my Claim under J00ME572. I will now be able to find the details as Kent Police has returned our computers and three laptops as well as the 4 USB Memory Sticks and 3 Mobile Phones and the alleged stalking and sending of malicious emails were not pursued by Kent Police against me in the end for reasons only known to them. I have my own speculation. The original Claim against Kent Police had been lodged in the Kings Bench of the High Court under Claim No HQ17X01773, but without a Defence being submitted to the Court by the Defendant Master Eastman ruled that I had not provided sufficient clarification of what the Particulars of Claim were. I appealed, but no replies came.

 

2. As regards the Claim that I lodged at the Central London County Court under Claim E35YM660 that I also requested you to intervene on a Hearing was announced in December 2022 for 20 January 2023 to hear my Appeal but despite months of representations that I made to the Circuit Judge for a Summary Judgment or Directions for further Hearings the Court did not reply to a single one of emails. The original Application Notice that I submitted to the Court challenge all of the Judges’ rulings since Claim inception was submitted on 21/13 June 2021, soon after I was ordered to pay the Costs of the Defendant of £4170.

 

3. Until the Full Written Reasons for the following proceedings are made available to me the private prosecution and litigation must continue:

(a) Why the Injunction against Kent Police at Medway County Court failed.

(b) Why East Kent Magistrates Court could not find the Case Number for the private prosecution of the Chief Constable of Kent Police from its own records.

(c) Why the stalking and harassment that I was held as a suspect on by Kent Police on 5+2 occasions was considered a criminal matter and not a civil matter.

(d) Why Maidstone Crown Court would not facilitate my counter-prosecution against Kent Police from 2017 onwards.

(e) Why the matter of my Claim against Wigmore Medical Centre in the first of two Claims that I lodged at the County Courts Money Claims Centre never got past the initial hurdle of approval.

(f) Why I was told by the Central London County Court that the Hearing that was presided over by District Judge Lightman would be a Pre-Trial Hearing on me.

(g) Why the North Kent Magistrates Court never entertained my application for overturning the Bail conditions imposed on me by Kent Police.

(h) Why the Charge Refused Certificate from Kent Police attached (ChargeRefusedCertificationfromKentPolice-1.pdf) are entirely different from the original offences of Stalking and sending Malicious Communications.

4. If you can find out the answers to this at the eleventh hour, that would go someway towards me withdrawing my complaint against you at the Legal Ombudsman.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

 

On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 13:01, forz khan <FK@thechambersoffkhan.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Dr Panigrahi

Is there anything else you would like to add?

Has the private prosecution finished now?

Kindest regards.

F. Khan.

Counsel.

Middle Temple.

Trinity 1988.

The Chambers of F. Khan, London

Direct Mobile - 07854 109 584  -  Email - FK@TheChambersofFKhan.co.uk

Regulated by The Bar Standards Board     

Confidentiality Notice

This email is confidential. If you are not the addressee do not use it at all. Instead email it back to the sender and delete it. This email and attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving. We will not be liable for any damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or any viruses being passed on.

Important Notice

All emails sent to or from this address will be received by The Chambers of F. Khan Email System and may be subject to archive and review. All email accounts hosted by The Chambers of F. Khan are corporate email accounts. These accounts and their contents remain the property of The Chambers of F. Khan. They are not personal email accounts and must not be used for the purpose of exchanging Sensitive Personal Information as defined by the Data Protection Act 1998 (1998 c29).

 

Sent: 06 May 2024 10:41

Subject: Re: Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister/Chambers

    

Dear Mr Khan

You delayed the private prosecution.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer

On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 9:03 am, forz khan

Dear Dr Panigrahi

Thank you for your email

I will deal with the matter as a formal complaint in accordance with the complaints policy of chambers - further copy attached.

I am unable to respond to a complaint unless I know exactly what it is that I have alleged to have done incorrectly.

Please can you send me a detailed breakdown of your assertions so I can respond.

Kindest regards.

F. Khan.

Counsel.

Middle Temple.

Trinity 1988.

The Chambers of F. Khan, London

Direct Mobile - 07854 109 584  -  Email - FK@TheChambersofFKhan.co.uk

Regulated by The Bar Standards Board     

Confidentiality Notice

This email is confidential. If you are not the addressee do not use it at all. Instead email it back to the sender and delete it. This email and attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving. We will not be liable for any damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or any viruses being passed on.

Important Notice

All emails sent to or from this address will be received by The Chambers of F. Khan Email System and may be subject to archive and review. All email accounts hosted by The Chambers of F. Khan are corporate email accounts. These accounts and their contents remain the property of The Chambers of F. Khan. They are not personal email accounts and must not be used for the purpose of exchanging Sensitive Personal Information as defined by the Data Protection Act 1998 (1998 c29).

 

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Sent: 05 May 2024 12:09

Subject: Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister/Chambers

        

Dear Mr Forz Khan

 

In view of your silence concerning the £3000 that I paid the Firm with a contractual agreement for a private prosecution against Kent Police in the Magistrates Court or the Crown Court, but you did not act quickly enough for my purposes I asked you to refund that money; following which you refused to get involved in the civil litigation against the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in Central London County Court under Claim E35YM660 wherein I demanded £100 million in damages and compensation for the 26 years that I suffered from defrauding me of my severance payment of £55,000 by the University of Greenwich, MI5 engineered trolling terrorism under the guise of Victims of Panigrahi Association, police brutality by Kent Police, North Yorkshire Police, West Yorkshire Police, the Independent Office for Police Conduct, terrorism through Banks and Institutions such as Employment Business, The Financial Services Ombudsman, The Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman, persecution for being a Hindu, intensive perverting of the course of justice and obstruction of justice; I put it to you that you were well aware that both Police authorities and the other security services were above the law and your demand for £3000 to lead me astray was perverse.

 

The Bar Standards Board has informed me that you have 4 weeks to reply to me on this complaint following which the matter will go to the Legal Ombudsman for a decision in accordance to my subsequent findings as linked here: https://www.thelibertariandemocrats.com/forum/diary-of-the-author/5-may-2024-11-27-am-uk-time  

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

_________________________________________________________________________________________

from:    Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>

to:          shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com

date:     7 May 2024, 07:49

subject:               Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

mailed-by:         mail-sor-f69.google.com

Signed by:          googlemail.com

security:             Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

Error Icon

Address not found

Your message wasn't delivered to SE.MagistratesCourt@cps.gov.uk.cjsm.net because the address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail.

The response from the remote server was:

 

550 Sender address belongs to a non-trusted organisation [macl]

 

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Cc:

Bcc:

Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 07:49:09 +0100

Subject: APPEAL FOR A RETRIAL ON THE 10 NOVEMBER 2023, 2 PM CONVICTION AND SENTENCING

----- Message truncated -----

____________________________________________________________________

Automatic reply: EXTERNAL - APPEAL FOR A RETRIAL ON THE 10 NOVEMBER 2023, 2 PM CONVICTION AND SENTENCING

Inbox

 

from:    CPU Driver Diversion External Use Only Kent <driver.diversion@kent.police.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     7 May 2024, 07:49

subject:               Automatic reply: EXTERNAL - APPEAL FOR A RETRIAL ON THE 10 NOVEMBER 2023, 2 PM CONVICTION AND SENTENCING

Signed by:          kent.police.uk

security:             Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

***

This is an automated response***

 Your email has been received by the Kent Police Traffic Enforcement Team.

Should your enquiry require a response this may take up to 28 days due to the high volume of correspondence we receive. Please therefore note that any subsequent chase up emails to this inbox may result in a further delayed response.

Traffic

Enforcement Team number is 01622 650200.  Lines are open 8am – 2pm Monday Friday.

Traffic Enforcement Team postal address is Kent Police, Traffic Enforcement Team, Sutton Road, Maidstone, Kent, ME15 9BZ.

Kent Police Offence View is available to view information of the alleged offence such as photographic evidence, calibration certificate and site biography. Please visit

using the PIN on your paperwork.

Please do NOT contact any other

Kent Police departments regarding your alleged Speeding/Redlight/Red X offence, including 101 and emergency contact numbers, as these lines need to be kept free for other purposes and they will be unable to assist you.

Useful Contacts:

Regional Fixed

Penalty Office

If you have queries regarding payment of a Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty or the endorsement and/or submission of your Driving Licence details:

Tel: 01702 283860

Address: PO Box 5992, Southend On Sea, Essex, SS1 9PX

Kent County Council

Tel: 03000 418282

Website:

National Speed Awareness Course (NSAC)

- Kent County Council

 DVLA

Tel: 0300 790 6801

Website:

National

Highways

 

Tel: 0300 123 5000

Website:

Email:

info@nationalhighways.co.uk This email and any other accompanying document(s) contain information from Kent Police and/or Essex Police, which is confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) or bodies to whom it is addressed. The content, including any subsequent replies, could be disclosable if relating to a criminal investigation or civil proceedings. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or other use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by contacting the sender or telephoning Kent Police on 01622 690690 or Essex Police on 01245 491491, as appropriate. For further information regarding Kent Police’s or Essex Police’s use of personal data please go to https://www.kent.police.uk/hyg/privacy/ or https://www.essex.police.uk/hyg/privacy/. Additionally for our Terms and Conditions please go to https://www.kent.police.uk/hyg/terms-conditions/ or https://www.essex.police.uk/hyg/terms-conditions/

...

 

[Message clipped]  View entire message

____________________________________________________________________

Auto-Reply

Inbox

 

from:    KentCPO <KentCPO@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     7 May 2024, 07:50

subject:               Auto-Reply

mailed-by:         justice.gov.uk

Signed by:          justice.gov.uk

security:             Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

Thank you for your email.

We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.

Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.

Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.

If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.

Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/

Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you

Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals planning and preparations

 

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

21 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

FURTHER HARASSMENT CLAIM E35YM660

FURTHER HARASSMENT CLAIM E35YM660 Yahoo/Inbox Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Central London DJSKEL Thu, 20 Jun at 15:08 To Circuit Judge Central London County Court Your Honour

CLAIM E35YM660

CLAIM E35YM660 Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Central London DJSKEL Tue, 18 Jun at 15:30 To Circuit Judge Central London County Court Your Honour The investigations

IS THIS OF INTEREST?

IS THIS OF INTEREST? Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:georgia.moss@legalvision.co.uk Tue, 18 Jun at 12:00 Dear Georgia I thought that you should be aware of this sinis

Comments


bottom of page