CA-2023-000750 APPEAL OUTCOME
- Shantanu Panigrahi
- Aug 1, 2025
- 11 min read
CA-2023-000750 APPEAL OUTCOME
Yahoo/Sen
Shantanu Panigrahi
To:Enquiries Medway County, civil.claims@kent.pnn.police.uk, Central London DJSKEL, KentCPO, Civil Appeals - Registry, registry@supremecourt.uk
Fri 1 Aug at 10:48
Dear Sir/Madam
Please advise me on this Friday if there is to be an outcome to the proceedings on the attached Claim Application Form at the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
Particulars of Damages and Compensation J00ME572&E35YM660 in Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Kent Police_Prime Minister of UKA1Augusty2025.pdf 83.9 kB:
STILL AWAITING THE RESOLUTION OF THE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FORM
What has happened to my Claim for Damages and Compensation from the UK Treasury in accordance with the following Particulars?
Particulars of Damages and Compensation J00ME572&E35YM660 at Medway County Court in Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Kent Police and in Central London County Court against the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
This Claim is brought to the Medway County Court against Kent Police and the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom at the Central London County Court with their co-conspirators (officials in His Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service, Lawyers, the Legal Ombudsman, Financial Services Ombudsman, Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman and the Independent Office for Police Conduct) on the following chargesheet against this Police Force:
(a) protecting criminals on my submission of Internet Complaint hate crime by Phands and MI5/MI6: £250,000;
(b) protecting criminals on the Shell Tribunal matter: £5,000;
(c) protecting criminals in the UKIP proceedings matter: £1000;
(d) protecting criminals in University of Greenwich legalities matter - back pay
£30,000*26 years on 20 October 2022: £780,000;
(e) protecting criminals in the National Health Service directed crimes against me: £1,000,000;
(f) protecting criminals in the AuthorhouseUK book publication matter: £3,000;
(g) protecting the Legal Ombudsman, Financial Serviceman Ombudsman Solicitors Regulation
Authority, from criminal activities against me with regard to numerous lawyers and Banks and the NHS that I complained: £200,000;
(h) Dover capture by Kent Police in 2004 to incarcerate me in a mental hospital without due reason: £5,000,000;
(i) capturing me at home and under handcuffs returning me to the mental hospital from where I had lawfully absconded: £1,000,000;
(j) pointless prosecutions of speeding offence that I was collecting money to discharge in January 2017 and booking the Speed Awareness Course in October 2022: £1,000,000;
(k) protecting court officials who gave me an unjustified criminal record with the processing of the speeding offence at Medway Magistrates Court: £1,000,000;
(l) protecting the Labour Party in its hate crime of denying me my membership rights to submit
Motions, and Questions to the Prime Minister: £1,000,000;
(m) protecting the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Conservative Prime Ministers including Mr Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak who obstructed and perverted the course of justice against the Claimant in Claim E35YM660 of the Central London County Court: £1,000, 000;
(n) protecting the Prosecutor at the International Criminal Court for thwarting justice in Claim No Court Reference: OTP-CR-76/22: £100,000;
(o) protecting the Norway membership of the Security Council from bringing the submissions of the Claimant to the attention of the Security Council, the General Assembly of the United Nations and the Secretary General of the United Nations: £1,000,000;
(p) protecting Wordpress.com internet service providers in unfairly and criminally suspending two of the Claimant's Blogs https://shantanup.wordpress.com and
https://towardsknowledgeforworldconservation.com: £1,000,000;
(q) Framing false allegations of harassment and stalking by me against Katrina Sale, BP, IOPC,
educational establishments, staff of BLM Law that it knew I had nothing to do with and that it was organised by the State Security Services within the UK and in the United States of America; false arrest and confiscation of our family computer and Mobile Phone devices: £1,000,000;
(r) protecting criminals of BP, ASDA, Sainsburys, Moto and Tesco for denying me employment
unfairly: £1,000,000;
(s) protecting Lulu Publishing that disabled my book publishing programme of ‘The Allurement of Reality without giving me a chance to rectify any errors that it found questionable on the 88 eBooks and print books: £1,000,000;
(t) protecting PAYPAL, Santander Bank and Barclays Bank for fraudulent activities on my Bank
Account: £500,000;
(u) protecting the Samaritans, Charity Commission and the Parliamentary and Health Service
Ombudsman for covering up the hate crimes by Victims of Panigrahi Association (VOPA), a unit of the Security Services: £1,000,0000;
(v) protecting Stripe Payments (UK) for deceitful and duplicitous dealings to withhold banking
support to VishistaAdvaitaSampradaya(TCLS/TCLP-UK) of my Company The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited: £1,000,000;
(w) protecting the Tech Giants LinkedIn, Instagram, Krishna, Google and Facebook of terroristic harassment on me over several years: £1,000,000;
(x) protecting Wix.com Internet Website Company that discredited and defamed me without an
explanation by disabling my website https://knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com
£2,000,000 and other manipulations;
(y) protecting Jonathon Bradley, Sole practice law practice, for inflicting terroristic attack on me by email that required immediate investigation by Kent Police: £1,000,000.
(z) refusal to investigate the matter of the criminal manipulation of the Claimant’s petitions to the House of Commons Petition Committee (£1,000,000);
(aa) HMRC’s Hate Crime Terrorism (with Debetam) and Companies House that imposed an unjustified tax-penalties of £400 and £150 on the author’s Company and other mischiefs since project inception (£500,000);
(ab) UK-Ford’s refusal to pay compensation for dodgy car with faults and car parts issue in 2023 forcing us to purchase another car (£24,000).
(ac) Violations of the rules of posting in my websites as criminal acts by persons unidentified by Kent Police. (£500,000);
(ad) Banking Failure from six Banks and their supervision by the Financial Ombudsman in a lackadaisical manner over an 8 month period (£2 million);
(ae) refusal to investigate the Liberal Democrats, Conservative and Unionist Party, Labour Party and Reform UK Party for denying me democratic representation as a Member for over a decade because they could not tolerate the truths that I was expounding as a patriot in the United Kingdom (£5 million);
(af) Monarch’s veto to prevent any progress in the recruitment of Members for The Conservative Libertarian Party of the United Kingdom (TCLP-UK) thereby preventing its registration with the Electoral Commission and its engagement in a Global Developmental mission that has considerable importance for the author’s career as an Environmental Sustainability Specialist; (£200 million);
(ag) protecting the real criminals perpetrating dastardly scam of entrapment for ulterior motives by playing the one-two game with Action Fraud;
(ah) Our work at Stripe Bank in relation to the functionality of The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited has been blocked by Information Commissioner Office in the most deceitful insidious manner possible (£1,000,000);
(ai) protecting Tik Tok that perpetrated harassing terrorism on me concerning the marketing of 435 eBooks of the Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited;
(aj) protecting Gurpal Singh Tiwana, Daneswari Kundeti, and three RaviKumars who had agreed to act as officials of the TCLP-UK in the Registration of the Party with the Electoral Commission in conspiracy with the Commission (£1,000,000) but reneged; and
(ak) protecting Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn from discriminating as a Hate Crime against me in the consideration of ‘Support Needed for New Party Formation’ for me (£1,000,000).
Summary of Claim:
In the final analysis the listed offences are designated as the crime of Religious Persecution on the Claimant by the State authorities of the United Kingdom, for which an additional £0.5 billion in the Claim value is demanded.
The total amount of suffering endured through the implementation of processes listed in a-ak above over 27 years is the tip of the iceberg: with the continued terrorism suffered by the Claimant the monetary value of the compensation Claim is immeasurable; however, the he now submits that £2.0 billion award from the Treasury of the United Kingdom is justified.
(Signed)
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Claim Amount Last Revised: 10.10 pm (UK-Time) 1 August 2025
____________________________________________________________________
CA-2023-000750 APPEAL OUTCOME
Central London DJSKEL
To:Shantanu Panigrahi
Fri 1 Aug at 10:49
Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.
Thank You
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
____________________________________________________________________
Automatic Response
Yahoo/Inbox
Civil Appeals - Registry
To:Shantanu Panigrahi
Fri 1 Aug at 10:49
Thank you for your email.
Legal Representatives
Please note that from Monday 14th February 2022 it is now mandatory for professional users to submit all documents (e.g. bundles, skeleton arguments, application notices etc.) via E-Filing. General correspondence may be sent by email.
CE-File Information & Support https://www.gov.uk/guidance/ce-file-system-information-and-support-advice
This is pursuant to Practice Direction 51O of the CPR and the Practice Note which supplements it.
For Unrepresented Parties only
URGENT applications should be submitted to the court via email to this address: civilappeals.urgentwork@justice.gov.uk between 9am and 4.15 pm
What may be deemed as urgent:
Cases where in the interests of justice a substantive decision is required within 7 days. The types of work listed below fall into this category
• Child cases
• Committal appeals
• Applications for stay of removal
• Evictions
• Cases (including ancillary applications) with a hearing listed in the Court of Appeal within the next month
• Applications for an urgent stay of execution
• Covid-19 related cases e.g., medical guidance regarding priority patients
NON-URGENT applications should be emailed to: civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk
This auto response is confirmation that your email has been received and you will not receive a separate acknowledgement. Staff will follow the internal processes that have been established to process your application as quickly as possible.
All appellant’s notices will be accepted in the first instance on the basis that they may be rejected at a later date for want of jurisdiction.
Fresh applications for permission to appeal must include:
• a completed appellant’s notice (form N161)
• grounds of appeal on a separate sheet
• The appropriate court fee via your PBA account, a completed Help with Fees form (EX160) or by contacting the RCJ Fees Office on 0203 936 8957 or by emailing RCJfeespayments@justice.gov.uk between the hours of 10:00am and 16:00pm, Monday to Friday (except bank holidays)
• a copy of the sealed order being appealed.
• A transcript of judgment should also be provided if available (or should be ordered immediately)
The public counter at E307 (Registry) remains closed, however a drop box facility is available at the main entrance into the Royal Courts of Justice.
Once the appellant’s notice is issued, all queries should be emailed to the appropriate following addresses:
The court will issue orders electronically in the first instance.
You can find contact details for other courts in other jurisdictions at the Courts & Tribunals Finder.
For information on how HMCTS uses personal data about you please see: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal-information-charter
Customer feedback
The Court of Appeal – Civil Division accepts online complaints through the HMCTS online complaint form: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/complaints-procedure
The online customer feedback system has been designed to help customers make an administrative complaint through the HM Courts & Tribunals Service process. It will also help us to learn from customer feedback to feed into possible improvements to the way we work.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated Delivery Response. Please do NOT reply to this email, it will NOT be viewed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
____________________________________________________________________
Auto-Reply
Yahoo/Inbox
KentCPO
To:Shantanu Panigrahi
Fri 1 Aug at 10:49
Thank you for your email.
We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.
Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.
Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.
If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.
Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/
Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you
Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals planning and preparations
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
____________________________________________________________________
Automatic reply: CA-2023-000750 APPEAL OUTCOME
Yahoo/Inbox
UKSC Registry
To:Shantanu Panigrahi
Fri 1 Aug at 10:49
Thank you for your email.
If you have an existing reference number, we will respond in due course.
All new applications and queries must be submitted through the Portal - we will not respond to new applications or queries from this email address. If you are self-represented please see our guidance here before taking any further action: Self-represented parties - UK Supreme Court
Visit our new Case Management Portal for applications and our website for queries The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. New UKSC Practice Directions and rules are now active and will be applicable for all new applications/queries (existing cases at the court will refer to the old rules and practice directions, UKSC).
Registry staff and services are available between the hours of 9am - 5pm, Monday to Friday. The Registries are closed on UK Bank Holidays. Queries and applications can be submitted through the case management portal during any closure period and will be dealt with when the Registries re-open. Any deadlines that fall when the Registries are closed are automatically extended as per UKSC PD2.5.
The original of this e-mail was scanned and on leaving the UKSC/JCPC network this was certified as virus free, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the organisation.
If you are contacting the Registry regarding a text message you have received asking for payment for a parking ticket, this is a scam.
Do not click on the link and do not provide any personal or banking details. For more information, please see our website; Supreme Court Impersonation Scams - The Supreme Court




Comments