top of page
Search

CA-2023-00750: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK

CA-2023-00750: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK

Inbox


from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to: QBJudgesListingOffice@justice.gov.uk

cc: Northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>,

eastkentmc <eastkentmc@justice.gov.uk>,

Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>,

Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

date: 10 Oct 2023, 14:19

subject: CA-2023-00750: Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK

mailed-by: gmail.com



To

Judges at

Kings Bench Division of the High Court


Your Honour


I did not receive the clarification from Lady Justice Andrews on the proceedings at the Court of Appeal as attached: ToCourtofAppealccGLD(Dr S Panigrahi v Prime Minister CA_2023_000750)9Oct2023.docx, so I presume that she has made the right decision to refer this Case to the High Court. I had been under the impression that the Court of Appeal had a civil division and a criminal division who would liaise with each other to discharge the duties of the Court of Appeal, but no such information has been forthcoming to me this morning. This is especially important in relation to the attached correspondence with Sandra White Kent CPO(ToKentCPO(sandraWhiteReplyR v Dr Panigrahi 46511327153(Summons of all offences)9Oct2023.docx, to which no reply was received by me. First Sandra White listed this matter for a decision at Folkestone Magistrates Court for 17October 2023 without my presence after several months of having the matter listed for a Trial of myself at Medway Magistrates Court which I would have to attend as attached (LetterfromNKMC HearingTrial10Nov2023.pdf), Then she is now saying by email as you will note that the Hearing is listed back to take place on 10 November 2023, 2 pm at Medway Magistrates Court by. As you are no doubt aware the moving of the venue back and forth negates and nullifies the original Summons for Referral to Court so new summons should be issued as I had requested.


I would be grateful if you would kindly and urgently list this Case at the Kings Bench Division of the High Court as seemingly directed by Lady Justice Andrews of the Court of Appeal.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619

3

Attachments

• Scanned by Gmail

3

Attachments

• Scanned by Gmail


(a) ToCourtofAppealccGLD(Dr S Panigrahi v Prime Minister CA_2023_000750)9Oct2023.docx

(b) ToKentCPO(sandraWhiteReplyR v Dr Panigrahi 46511327153(Summons of all

offences)9Oct2023.docx

(c) LetterfromNKMC HearingTrial10Nov2023.pdf:



ToCourtofAppealccGLD(Dr S Panigrahi v Prime Minister CA-2023-000750)9Oct2023
.docx
Download DOCX • 19KB

ToKentCPO(SandraWhiteReplyR v Dr Panigrahi 46SJ1327153Summonsofalloffences9Oct2023
.docx
Download DOCX • 16KB

LetterfromNKMCHearingTrial10Nov2023_2pm
.pdf
Download PDF • 1.62MB

26 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660 Inbox from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> to:          constitution@parliament.uk, pacac@parliament.uk cc:         Central London DJSKEL <centr

zoom: no help forthcoming

zoom Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Forz Khan Khan Tue, 21 May at 11:50 Dear Forz Thank you for your email this morning: I have done what you asked me to do: https:/

Automatic reply: VALID CASE

Automatic reply: VALID CASE Inbox from:    Technical Advice <technical.advice@legalombudsman.org.uk> to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> date:     21 May 2024, 11:04 subject:

Comments


bottom of page