Cancelled: FOI 72615 - (Shantanu Panigrahi) - 2022-11-01 - (Acknowledgement)3
Yahoo
/
Inbox
Request or by a si
Thu, 17 Nov at 13:07
FOI Requests <foirequests@homeoffice.gov.uk>
To:
Shantanu Panigrahi
Thu, 17 Nov at 13:17
Dear Shantanu Panigrahi,
Thank you for your email. As far as I can tell this does not read as a Freedom of Information Request. The business area dealing with your query will respond accordingly.
Regards
N McKenzie
Home Office
From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>
Sent: 17 November 2022 13:08
To: FOI Requests <FOIRequests@homeoffice.gov.uk>
Subject: Re: Cancelled: FOI 72615 - (Shantanu Panigrahi) - 2022-11-01 - (Acknowledgement)
Do you trust this email? This email originated from outside the Home Office, or came from a Home Office system that has not been certified. Please exercise caution before opening attachments or clicking on links within this email or any suspicious email, particularly from unknown senders.
Dear N Mckenzie
(Home Office)
1. Thank you for your email: statng that matters on which I required information on did not fall within the criteria of the Freedom of Information Act.
2. I have another Freedom of Information Request being dealt with through What do they knonw as follows:
I require an up-to-date synopsis of legal proceedings under Claims E35YM660, JOOME572, HQ17x01773 and CO/1680/2002
3. Would these two requests need to be combined into one request under Freedom of Information Request or by a single business area - please clarify so that I receive back only one report on the proceedings.
4. You will appreciate that I am a mental patient and the 25 years of struggle through mental deficiencies of paranoid schizophrenia and persistent delusions combined with mood instability and autism makes me jump to conclusions that may be totally unjustified, so please assess my latest blog post as part of the investigations by the Business Area of the Home Office: The Underworld State Establishment of the United Kingdom (thelibertariandemocrats.com) https://www.thelibertariandemocrats.com/post/the-underworld-state-establishment-of-the-united-kingdom
The Underworld State Establishment of the United Kingdom
Just to put the record straight, the linked post here was a criminal anonymous email that I received Re: Explodi...
5. I look forward to your further clarification immediately so that I can put my legal involvements on hold pending your Final Decisions, especially in relation to the involvement and intervention of the Attorney General into my affairs over the past 25 days.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
On Thursday, 17 November 2022 at 12:07:14 GMT, FOI Requests <foirequests@homeoffice.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear Shantanu Panigrahi,
Please be aware that the business area dealing with yoyr email below have decided to handle your correspondence outside the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act. This is because it does not meet the criteria for a Freedom of Information request. Below is a link to the ICO guidance for the criteria for valid requests under the Act:
https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1164/recognising-a-request-made-under-the-foia.pdf
The Home Office will provide an answer to your query, but it will be answered outside of the provisions of the Act. You should expect to receive a response in due course from the appropriate Home Office business area. FOI 72615 has beenn cancelled.
Regards
N McKenzie
Home Office
From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>
Sent: 01 November 2022 06:57
To: FOI Requests <FOIRequests@homeoffice.gov.uk>
Cc: tiwana9rf@btinternet.com; Ray Coker <raycokerconsulting@gmail.com>; PSD Complaints Kent <psd.complaints@kent.police.uk>; enquiries@policeconduct.gov.uk; PCC Correspondence Kent <contactyourpcc@kent.police.uk>
Subject: FOI REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FORMALLY LODGED
Do you trust this email? This email originated from outside the Home Office, or came from a Home Office system that has not been certified. Please exercise caution before opening attachments or clicking on links within this email or any suspicious email, particularly from unknown senders.
To
The Home Office
Dear Sirs
With reference to the contents of the attached link Request made through my MP Rehman Chishti for information on Legal Police amendments on Policing Gui (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/request-made-through-my-mp-rehman-chishti-for-information-on-legal-police-amendments-on-policing-gui
Request made through my MP Rehman Chishti for information on Legal Polic...
Your internal review request has been sent on its way. Request made through my MP Rehman Chishti for information...
and
Kent Police: Freedom of Information Request FOI/01299/222 (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/kent-police-freedom-of-information-request-foi-01299-222
Kent Police: Freedom of Information Request FOI/01299/222
Kent Police: Freedom of Information Request FOI/01299/222 Yahoo / Sent Mon, 31 Oct at 09:28 Shantanu Panigrahi <...
on Freeedom of Information Request submitted through 'What do they know', a well wisher of mine who wishes to remain anonymous (Cherie) has sent me the following email this morning with a '01299 (of 2022) Reference Number.
Kindly provide me with the fullest and comprehensive Report on what the Home Secretary Suella Braverman has done on the recommendations made to changes in legal policy on policiing guidelines.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillihgnam
Kent ME8 0SL
Tel: 07967789619
----- Forwarded message ----- Fw: Panigrahi/Tiwana FOI Request Number
From: EM <remailer.austria@t-online.de>
To: "shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com" <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>; "shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com" <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>; "tiwana9rf@btinternet.com" <tiwana9rf@btinternet.com>; "raycokerconsulting@gmail.com" <raycokerconsulting@gmail.com>; "foirequests@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk" <foirequests@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, 1 November 2022 at 04:32:35 GMT
Subject: Panigrahi/Tiwana FOI Request Number
Dear Shan,
The required FOI number is, from the records of which EM managed to have sight, "01299" (of 2022). You must provide this to progress the request with Mr Ennis.
I don't understand what is the involvement of Mr Tiwana or Mr Coker in this matter or in the original complaint itself. They may resent their personal information now being findable on the www.WHATDOTHEYKNOW.com website which is regularly "indexed by Google".
But I am confident that, like always, you know best!
~~~Cherie
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are private and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please return it to the address
it came from telling them it is not for you and then delete it from your system.
This email message has been swept for computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are private and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please return it to the address
it came from telling them it is not for you and then delete it from your system.
This email message has been swept for computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
Comments