CASE PROGRESSION CLARIFICATION
- Shantanu Panigrahi
- May 1, 2024
- 3 min read
CASE PROGRESSION CLARIFICATION
Inbox
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>
date: 1 May 2024, 14:14
subject: CASE PROGRESSION CLARIFICATION
mailed-by: gmail.com
To
The Circuit Judge
Central London County Court
Your Honour
By deliberate conspiracy involving humans as an example of conspiracy theories, I am disenfranchised not only from legal representation to the Courts but also political representation to the House of Commons as your Honour will note from the attached: ToTaylorHamptonOlivesSolicitorsccRehmanChishti(CLAIM E35YM660)30Apr2024.docx.
The only way to determine this conundrum of whether my Case is an allegation of a conspiracy theory with individuals and institutions organised against me by the State authorities, namely the Crown, or in reality it simply reflects the nuances of Brahma-Nature that I as a satya-advaitic yogi in the Hindu fold of Vishista Advaita Vedanta have contemplated for long; is to have a Hearing of all human parties concerned with this Case. Is that possible for the Judiciary to organise please?
Yours sincerely
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
One attachment • Scanned by Gmail
ToTaylorHamptonOlivesSolicitorsccRehmanChishti(CLAIM E35YM660)30Apr2024.docx
Claim E35YM660
Shantanu Panigrahi
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
Olivessolicitors Info <info@olivessolicitors.com>
date: 30 Apr 2024, 21:25
subject: Re: Claim E35YM660
mailed-by: gmail.com
Dear Sir/Madam
This is just to let you know my deep disappointment with the Judicial and Law Enforcement systems that I have had to suffer through over the past 26 years, firstly at the hands of the Mental Health authorities who treated me as either persistently delusional or worse paranoid schizophrenic and then when I tried to make my case to the Judicial authorities and Law Enforcement authorities in Kent Police where my Complaint CO/999/23 has still not reached a conclusion.
To add salt to injury all my attempts to have the injustices heard in the House of Commons over the two and half decades since I submitted a petition to Her Majesty the Late Queen Elizabeth II failed to pass the hurdles of the established parties of the nation.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
Tel: 07967789619
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 16:30, Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> wrote:
To
Judiciary
Central London County Court
Dear Sir/Madam
For your kind consideration, the linked matter: https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/progress-with-the-defamation-lawsuit-instructions
Please let me know how you wish to proceed.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
____________________________________________________________________
CASE PROGRESSION CLARIFICATION
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>
date: 1 May 2024, 14:14
subject: CASE PROGRESSION CLARIFICATION
mailed-by: gmail.com
Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.
Thank You
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
コメント