Compensation: Claim E35YM660
Compensation: Claim E35YM660
Shantanu Panigrahi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Central London DJSKEL County Court, Northkent Magistrates Court
Wed, 24 May at 07:10
Civil Claims Kent Police
1. Now that it has been proven that Kent Police has engaged itself in pointless arrests of myself on five occasions and with the threat of a sixth one in pursuing what are civil matters as linked here: Rachel, Katrina, Jacqui, Orla, not Lynnette or Carole (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/rachel-katrina-jacqui-orla-not-lynnette-or-carole
Rachel, Katrina, Jacqui, Orla, not Lynnette or Carole
Rachel, Katrina, Jacqui, Orla, not Lynnette or Carole Inbox from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmai...
this matter reverts to the Central London County Court (see CenLonCtyCrt NOTICE OF HEARING OF APPLICATION.pdf) from North Kent Magistrates Court (Medway Magistrates Court), as linked here:
CLAIM E35YM660: Civil Matter decision by Maidstone Crown Court (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/claim-e35ym660-civil-matter-decision-by-maidstone-crown-court
CLAIM E35YM660: Civil Matter decision by Maidstone Crown Court
CLAIM E35YM660: Civil Matter decision by Maidstone Crown Court Inbox from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi...
2. The summons to Court as attached: Notice of New Date of Hearing NKMC.docx; initiated by Kent Police at the Magistrates Court remains invalid consequently, as initially submitted: Application that Summons to Court is Invalid (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/application-that-summons-to-court-is-invalid-3
Application that Summons to Court is Invalid
Application that Summons to Court is Invalid from: Shantanu Panigrahi <email@example.com> to: ...
3. The damages and compensation arising from the negligence of Kent Police if not something more sinister must be settled within the demand for £10 million to be awarded to me.
4. Please let me have your initial response in light of these latest evidence presented to the Court herewith.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Kent ME8 0SL
Download all attachments as a zip file
Notice of New Date of Hearing NKMC.docx 15.3kB
Central London DJSKEL <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Wed, 24 May at 07:11
Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.