COURT CLAIM NO: J00ME572 - Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Chief Constable of Kent Police. Our ref: OXS/1509

COURT CLAIM NO: J00ME572 - Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Chief Constable of Kent Police. Our ref: OXS/150942/72 [BLM-LAW.FID10005113]2

Yahoo

Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To:

Scanlan, Orla

Cc:

Enquiries Medway County

Thu, 9 Jun at 21:43

Dear Ms Scanlan

1. The reason that I wrote to the Medway County Court this morning and not BLM Solicitors is that BLM Law is under Police investigation that is being monitored by DS Seamark of Kent Police to whom I reported your criminal activities against me. You say it is spurious that I should have asked for judgement by close of play today on the basis of the documentation that you have just raised which are part of that investigation of your suitability of having the necessary professional ethics to do the work of a Law Firm which includes your false pretences, perjury and conspiring with court officials in Medway County Court and the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. You were told by me to recuse yourself from these proceedings yet after the day has gone during which Medway County Court had kept silent to confirm my UpToDate analysis you have sent the Court this email and informed the court that you have copied the email to the Claimant so that the Court in your type of crime of perverting the course of justice and obstructing justice is spared of the need to send me copies of the documents that you have filed in tthe Court. This is because the Court does not wish to have my application go through the normal judicial processes of any civilised State. The following section from my latest book ‘Hindu-Spirituality Condensed’ that you may have read, but if not, I am hereby bringing it to the attention of all whom this matter may concern, is as follows:

Update:

No emails came this afternoon from anywhere, nor did the telephone ring as I was expecting for example from Vicky Randall of MEGAN CIC. It is all over with. I have proven that the Police are above the law and can do whatever they like in terms of their policing methods in this country in the current Constitution as interpreted by the State establishment. Kent Police can keep our desktop computer, my USB Memory Stick, Amazon Fire tablet and old Mobile phone and keep me under investigation for as long as they like. They do not answer to courts in civil litigation claims. The Establishment wanted this hidden, so they tried all tactics to put on the façade of civility that it has some values of human rights and civil rights that citizens should be entitled to. The Medway County Court did not reply to any of my emails. The Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court in the first instance struck out the Claim for money redress for its improper policing without providing the full written reasons for its decision. The matter could not be Appealed to a higher court. Even Judicial Review in the High Court to all my litigation and appeals failed both against Kent Police, against the University of Greenwich, and the Prime Minister of the country. The injunction was applied for and no decision has been made. They tried all kinds of means since 2017 to have me booted out of the country or placed once again in a mental hospital or worse in a prison cell to shut me up. Lately, their lawyers, to prevent the need for the Medway County Court to write to me on the progress of J00ME372 (Injunction and Money Claims) first tried to have it struck out with summary judgment, but I acted swiftly applying for a Hearing to consider the application. The Court did not reply. So, the State got its law firm to frame further allegation of harassment of its staff by me using set-up evidence of criminal anonymous emails. I tackled it by referring the law firm to the Solicitors Regulation Authority to order the firm to recuse itself from J00ME372 proceedings. This morning the Pre-action protocol and Solicitors Regulation Authority referral as well as the Mental Health referral was once again pressed for by the State through a criminal anonymous email, and Solicitor Regulation Authority wanted me to contact it by sending another silly email. I therefore promptly applied for default Judgment today. So, they were cornered, with no escape route but to have had its façade of civility exposed. It is a dictatorial monarch as one of my books had been written to be the Constitution of the United Kingdom.

2. Incidentally, there was an error in the date (30 May 2022, not 30 June 2022) by which the Defendant (Kent Police as the Injunction document clearly states in the top right-hand box, and the Money claims N1 Form; and not the Chief Constable personally for obvious reasons that Kent Police is an agency of the State Establishment which organised my persecution over the past 24 years) was required to file Defence. to the Court copied to me. So, the Medway County Court will be allowed one more day to clarify what its position is and no more than that. The Court has to send me an email by 12.00 noon tomorrow 10 June 2022 with its decision. I will now never voluntarily attend any Hearing at any of Her Majesty's Court and Tribunal Service, let that be known to the District Judge that you now seek to awaken out of the sleep he/she has been in for two months on the Injunction issue especially. To add to the co-conspirators in the Claim Form I now include the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Hide original message

On Thursday, 9 June 2022, 19:44:36 BST, Scanlan, Orla <orla.scanlan@blmlaw.com> wrote:

Dear Sirs

We are instructed to act on behalf of the defendant, the Chief constable of Kent Police.

Our client has today forwarded us the below email which the claimant sent today to the court (9 June), copying in our client’s civil claims department. The claimant’s email requests that the court enters judgment in default as the defendant has not filed an acknowledgment of service (AOS).

This is untrue. As the court is aware, we filed AOS and Notice of Acting on 19 May 2022.

The same was served on the claimant under cover of our letter dated 19 May 2022. The claimant acknowledged receipt of our letter in an email dated 23 May 2022 and in fact attached a copy of the AOS to this email. We attach the same for the court’s attention.

In the circumstances the claimant’s request for judgment in default is entirely spurious.

Should the claimant’s email below be referred to a district judge, we would kindly ask that this email also be drawn to the district judge’s attention.

The court will further be aware the defendant has filed an application to strike out and/or for summary judgement, a copy of which was served on the claimant. We are currently waiting to receive a hearing date for this application.

The claimant is copied into this email.

Many thanks

Orla Scanlan

BLM

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

Sent: 09 June 2022 08:13

To: 'Enquiries Medway County' <enquiries.medway.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>

Cc: 'Civil Claims Officers HQ Kent' <civil.claims@kent.police.uk>

Subject: EXTERNAL - Default Judgment in favour of Claimant on Claim No J00ME372

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Court Manager

Medway County Court

Dear Sir/Madam

In relation to the attached Notice of Issue of Claim (Document_2022-05-15206.pdf) the Defendant (Kent Police) has not filed an acknowledgement of Service, so that it had to file its Defence by way of a reply to the Court by 30 June 2022, which the Defendant has not done.

Accordingly, I am hereby applying for Default Judgment today.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619

BLM is a trading name of Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP, a limited liability partnership registered in England under number OC340981, authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA number 499736). The registered office is at 2 New Bailey Square, Stanley Street, Salford, M3 5GS where a list of members is available for inspection. In Ireland, Berrymans Lace Mawer is affiliated to Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP and the partners are either members or employees of Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP. Partners of Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP are members or employees of Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP and the use of the term “partner” should not be construed as indicating that the individuals so designated have entered into partnership (within the meaning of the Partnership Act 1890) with all or any of the individuals so designated or with any individuals and Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP. Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP is certified to Information Security Standard ISO 27001 (BSI certificate IS589484), Quality Assurance Standard ISO 9001 (SGS certificate GB 13/90471) and Lexcel, the Law Society's Practice Management Standard. The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential, subject to legal professional privilege or other privilege and intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorised to and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error please contact us at once so that we may take the appropriate action and avoid troubling you further. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept for the presence of known computer viruses. Please visit our website www.blmlaw.com. For more information about how BLM processes personal data please refer to our Privacy Statement. Please also be advised we will now endeavour to supply bills in an electronic format; please click here to review your statutory rights.

This Message originated outside your organization.

----- Forwarded message -----

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To: orla.scanlan@blm.law.com <orla.scanlan@blm.law.com>

Sent: Monday, 23 May 2022, 11:05:34 BST

Subject: Acknowledgment of Service on J00ME572

Orla Scanlon

BLM

30 Fenchurch Street

London

EC3M 3BL

T: +44 (0)20 7638 2811

F: +44 (0) 20 7920 0361

DX 33861

FINSBURY SQ

blmlaw.com

Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7865 3306

Your Reference: OXS/150942/72

Dear Ms Scanlon

In the past 10 minutes I have received your letter dated 19 May 2022 together with the Acknowledgment of Service as attached: Document_2022-05-23_103608.pdf in relation to the Injunction and Claim Form that I received from Medway County Court as attached: Document_2022-05-13_1520026.pdf

I wish to draw your attention to the anomaly at an early stage so that we may be able to come to a common understanding of the procedures that will be necessary for me to formulate the full particulars of Claim that the Claim Form states are to follow. Not knowing that I would receive an acknowledgment of service I had posted the following blogpost to bring to the attention of all those parties named as co-conspirators to Kent Police but not named as Defendants iin the Claim Form due to lack of space in the Form and because when I submitted my Claim I was not sure whether the Medway County Court has jurisdiction to hear the matter.Running Commentary on Legal Proceedings (J00ME372) 9.09 am (UK-Time) Update (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com). I would accordingly be grateful if you would let me know if the Chief Constable has any objections to what is suggested in the Particulars of Claim as currently developed.

As regards the Injunction matter, kindly forward me the Summary of indicating offence that the Chief Constable has been investigating me for since 15 September 2021 and following my arrest on 24 November 2021, together with the Crime Reference Number to the matter, and what its future plans are as whether the matter has been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service by Kent Police. In either event, I need by email al the 30 odd Katrina Sale malicious emails that I was invstigated for in terns of harassment and stalking in relation to the document issued to me on the latter date, as attached: NorthKentPoliceReleasewithoutbail.pdf'

I thank you in advance for your cooperation in identifying whether it was M15 that Kent Police was acting as an agent for over the 24 years of torture and victimisation that I have been subjected to as the alleged Hate Crime cited in the Injunction application document.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

This Message originated outside your organization.

----- Forwarded message -----

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To: orla.scanlan@blm.law.com <orla.scanlan@blm.law.com>

Sent: Monday, 23 May 2022, 11:05:34 BST

Subject: Acknowledgment of Service on J00ME572

Orla Scanlon

BLM

30 Fenchurch Street

London

EC3M 3BL

T: +44 (0)20 7638 2811

F: +44 (0) 20 7920 0361

DX 33861

FINSBURY SQ

blmlaw.com

Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7865 3306

Your Reference: OXS/150942/72

Dear Ms Scanlon

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

Download all attachments as a zip file

Untitled

12.2MB

Document_2022-05-23_103608.pdf 1.9MB

Document_2022-05-13_152026.pdf5.9MB

NorthKentPoliceReleasewithoutBail.pdf 1.2MB:

COURT CLAIM NO: J00ME572 - Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Chief Constable of Kent Police. Our ref: OXS/1509

Recent Posts

Comments

Daily Bulletin