top of page

Fw: Case E35YM660 and your failed extortion bid-Criminal anonymous Email

Updated: Jan 21, 2023

Fw: Case E35YM660 and your failed extortion bid


from: Shantanu Panigrahi <> via


date: 19 Jan 2023, 23:52

subject: Fw: Case E35YM660 and your failed extortion bid


security: did not encrypt this message Learn more

To retain, in my litigation proceedings folder, and as warning to Mr Michael Kingham who will be issued a subpoena in due course for the important role he plays in this matter.

_____ Original message _____

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <>

To:,,,, zara.broadley-

Date: 19 January 2023 11.04 pm

Subject: Case E35YM660 and your failed extortion bid

more to Jessica

Have no doubts, once your malicious and vindictive legal proceedings against me are brought to an end, you and your many colleagues including in TO19 or COBRA will be receiving little surprises from me by post at work and home, which will leave a permanent impact on your lives, positive or not I leave to your imaginations, and serve the greater purposes of humanity under Ram-Rajya.

If you and they want to go on without having to look over your shoulders for the rest of your lives, you must meet my lawful demands.

Supply me without a moment's further delay with the £ 4.4 million I have demanded as compensation for 25 years of torture and state-sponsored terrorism in a country of morons in a Police State. I will then settle HQ17X01773 and ME010463 too, and am open to discussing J00ME572.

Supply me for my use at my whim and pleasure and one of your youngest and least unattractive female staffers on whom I can expend my passions and unleash my danda. You may make the choice but I need to see bikini or underwear photographs before making my final decision. To make it fair, I

now put a photograph of me handling my danda for you to show your shortlisted candidates -


Or, should I send these directly to Adele, Susie, Zara, Gwen or Amanda, the rest I already know are unsuitable by way of appearance or age, so they feel more comfortable about the transaction? You may find yourself overrun by litigation claims at the Employment Tribunal for constructive dismissals.

I had nearly concluded negotiations concerning the provision of Geri Ottewell of BLM Law now Clyde Co. Solicitors but these were spontaneously exploded by the buccaneering of your perjurious conspirator Ms Orla Scanlan, who I reported to the regulatory bodies and who should be struck off any day soon.

Since I have dispensed with the services of Patterson Law who were found wanting, I will be retaining the services as my key witnesses Mrs Jill Jesson and her son Allen, whom I have kept fully informed of developments and whose conversations form part of my evidence bundle for the plaintiff.

I took precautions and will send this discreetly to prevent it prejudicing the final phases of E35YM660, and too late for you to add it to your defendants' affidavits. I have confirmed diagnoses of actute bipolar and paranoid schizophrenia, rendering me immune from any legal consequences. You exist for only one higher purpose, and that is to serve me as Krishnavatar in this dharmayudha. Is that understood?

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane


Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

----- Original message -----

Subject: Panigrahi v Theresa May (Cabinet Office) - E35YM660 - Defendant's

note setting out position in advance of hearing on 20 January 2023

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <>

To: Government Bitch <>, Enquiries <>, Central London Distrist Judges <>

Cc: Rashmi <

Bcc: Jill <>, Allen <>

to Jessica

Dear Ms Costa

The premise of your arguments are grossly faulty: I personally made an Application Notice to the Court on an Application Notice not on behalf of my wife Rashmi Panigrahi, but for myself as litigant in person. I had submitted three Application Notices after discussions with my wife that I contend that I am not mentally ill or disordered in way. This was during the week following the 21 June 2021 Order of District Judge Lightman. I paid £100 as Court Fee, When no actions was taken by the Court on the Application Notice and I was severely terrorised by the Security Services of the Cabinet Office in government the particulars of Claim changed over the past 18 months which makes the Application Notice submitted by me then as redundant (null and void) and a fresh new Application to take account all the facts of the matter that are contained in the skeleton arguments and bundle combined that you have received a copy of through omar sager at the Government Legal Department would be necessary except that I have not yet considered this matter while there is still time for an out-of court settlement now that the government has finally responded to me after dozens of emails, including to the Attorney General. The Hearing is accordingly unconstitutional for this essential factor. Your bundle should therefore consider all the details of the facts in the attached link: Running Commentary on Legal Proceedings (Claim E35YM660): Dr S. Panigrahi vs Prime Minister of UK (

and my application to the Court of Central London to have the Hearing aborted: APPLICATION TO ABORT THE HEARING OF 20 JANUARY 2023 (CLAIM E35YM660)

I have already approached the Court of Appeal to register the points as attached here:ToCourtiofAppealccCenLonCtyCrtKentPolice(LACK OF COMMON


is a matter for Kent Police.

Please acknowledge receipt of this email immediately.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane


Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619


[Message clipped] View entire message

14 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Re: Fwd: Signature

Re: Fwd: Signature Inbox Stripe from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <> to:          Stripe Support <> cc:         genna.ajram@join-it-a33ede169b68.intercom-mail.c


MEMBERSHIP IS ESSENTIAL Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi Sat, 13 Jul at 15:13 Dear Lauren Shapiro Please let me know if you are intere


bottom of page