top of page
Search

IS THERE ANY NEWS ON THE COMPLAINT AGAINST Mr FORZ KHAN, BARRISTER?

IS THERE ANY NEWS ON THE COMPLAINT AGAINST Mr FORZ KHAN, BARRISTER?

 

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Enquiries <enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk>

cc:         forz khan <Fk@thechambersoffkhan.co.uk>,

date:     8 May 2024, 13:17

subject:               IS THERE ANY NEWS ON THE COMPLAINT AGAINST Mr FORZ KHAN, BARRISTER?

mailed-by:         gmail.com

 

Dear Sirs

 

I had requested the Legal Ombudsman for its Complaint Form if it was necessary as attached:

(a) ToForzKhan(FurtherInformationPaymentbyInstalments)6May2024.docx

(b) ToLegalOmbudsman(Complaintmatter_Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister)6May2024.docx.

 

Please update me if this complaint has been actioned and if so where it lies now.

 

I require this information for legal purposes immediately.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kngdom

Tel: 07967789619

 

 2 attachments  • Scanned by Gmail

 

(a) ToForzKhan(FurtherInformationPaymentbyInstalments)6May2024.docx

(b) ToLegalOmbudsman(Complaintmatter_Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister)6May2024.docx.

 

(a)

It's been a while...2

Yahoo/Sent

 

Shantanu Panigrahi

To:Forz Khan Khan

Mon, 6 May at 19:34

Dear Forz

 

You asked for any further information that I had in your email today ( 6 May 2024, 17:11) and this specific company Vitali-Chi has been terrorising me for a just over a year since I sought a second opinion from a private psychotherapist Jill Jesson to determine whether I was really mentally disordered in some way for the history of my capture by Dover Police to be taken straight to a mental hospital and getting sectioned in 2004 has from what the idiots described as persistent delusional disorder to cover-up the State organised persecution on me when I was just trying to access justice (repeat incarceration in 2008) and subsequently another idiot Consultant Psychiatrist in the Care in the Community provisions of the National health Service said that I was paranoid schizophrenic need to be taken into account; for as I have always maintained, I am not just the sanest person on Earth living today but the sanest who has ever walked on the face of the planet.

 

I had 7-8 Sessions of psychotherapy from Jill Jesson and she was another of the idiotic medic who said that I had a split mind and needed hypnotherapy and other forms of self-control. I accused Jill Jesson as being part of the State-organised persecutors and this email that I warned the company not to send me has just been sent to pervert the course of justice as if I should contact Jill Jesson on WhatsApp as a mental patient.

 

I hope that I have now provided you with all the details to take over the private prosecution at North Kent Magistrates Court on the same contractual arrangement that we had previously. However do bear in mind that I am on State pension now to go with my private pension so would have to pay you for your services on instalments if you would be so kind as to agree to this proposal.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

 

 

----- Forwarded message -----

From: Vitali-Chi Ltd. <allen@vitali-chi.com>

To: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

Sent: Monday, 6 May 2024 at 17:05:46 BST

Subject: It's been a while...

 

SHOP NOW

 

Here's what's trending right now.

From time to time, we like to let you know which products are trending. We combined your interests with what's popular now to create recommendations just for you.

  


  

 




Image of Online Therapy - Two Hours

Online Therapy - Two Hours

Image of Super Aura & Chakra Repair Aura room Spray with Pure Bergamot and Bitter Orange Essential Oil

Super Aura & Chakra Repair Aura room Spray with Pure Bergamot and Bitter Orange Essential Oil

Image of WELLBEING PATCHES

WELLBEING PATCHES

Image of Crystal Clear Aura Spray & Room Spray with pure Teatree Lemon Essential Oil

Crystal Clear Aura Spray & Room Spray with pure Teatree Lemon Essential Oil

Image of Super Calm Aura & Room Spray with Lavender and Neroli Essential Oil

Super Calm Aura & Room Spray with Lavender and Neroli Essential Oil

Image of Looking For Calm? Create Calm With Super Calm AromaFrequencies+ Made With 100% Pure Lavender & Neroli Essential Oils

Looking For Calm? Create Calm With Super Calm AromaFrequencies+ Made With 100% Pure Lavender & Neroli Essential Oils

Shop Now

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

YouTube

No longer want to receive these emails? Unsubscribe.

Vitali-Chi Ltd. 110 Coast Road West Mersea, Essex, England CO5 8NA

 

(b)

Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister/Chambers

Inbox

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Enquiries <enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk>

date:     6 May 2024, 18:01

subject:               Re: Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister/Chambers

mailed-by:         gmail.com

To

The Legal Ombudsman

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Please note that this complaint matter has reached a dead end and send me any necessary Complaint Form.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

 

On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 17:11, forz khan <FK@thechambersoffkhan.co.uk> wrote:

 

Dear Dr Panigrahi

 

Thank you for the email.

 

Please can you clarify if there are any other points that you wish to raise. If so please provide full details.

 

Kindest regards.

 

F. Khan.

 

Counsel.

Middle Temple.

Trinity 1988.

The Chambers of F. Khan, London

Direct Mobile - 07854 109 584  -  Email - FK@TheChambersofFKhan.co.uk

 

Regulated by The Bar Standards Board     

 

Confidentiality Notice

This email is confidential. If you are not the addressee do not use it at all. Instead email it back to the sender and delete it. This email and attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving. We will not be liable for any damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or any viruses being passed on.

Important Notice

All emails sent to or from this address will be received by The Chambers of F. Khan Email System and may be subject to archive and review. All email accounts hosted by The Chambers of F. Khan are corporate email accounts. These accounts and their contents remain the property of The Chambers of F. Khan. They are not personal email accounts and must not be used for the purpose of exchanging Sensitive Personal Information as defined by the Data Protection Act 1998 (1998 c29).

 

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Sent: 06 May 2024 13:52

Subject: Re: Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister/Chambers

    

Dear Mr Khan

 

1. The private prosecution of Kent Police and the Prime Minister were launched without your assistance at East Kent Magistrates Court and Maidstone Crown Court by myself directly; East Kent Magistrates Court considered the original issue of summons on the Chief Constable of Kent Police and issued a Judgment that I had not provided sufficient clarification or information on the matter. I appealed but could not find the Case Number on which the summons was decided because Kent Police had seized all our computers and USB Memory Disks at the time containing those details. Then I got diverted by incessant criminal anonymous emails that were fired at me, my associates in the United Kingdom including my wife, and relatives in India. I took out an injunction against the Chief Constable of Kent Police to stop the Police Force terrorising me with arrests from 15 September 2021 onwards together with a Money Claims but due to procedural problems arising from my lack of expertise the Medway County Court stopped responding to my Claim under J00ME572. I will now be able to find the details as Kent Police has returned our computers and three laptops as well as the 4 USB Memory Sticks and 3 Mobile Phones and the alleged stalking and sending of malicious emails were not pursued by Kent Police against me in the end for reasons only known to them. I have my own speculation. The original Claim against Kent Police had been lodged in the Kings Bench of the High Court under Claim No HQ17X01773, but without a Defence being submitted to the Court by the Defendant Master Eastman ruled that I had not provided sufficient clarification of what the Particulars of Claim were. I appealed, but no replies came.

 

2. As regards the Claim that I lodged at the Central London County Court under Claim E35YM660 that I also requested you to intervene on a Hearing was announced in December 2022 for 20 January 2023 to hear my Appeal but despite months of representations that I made to the Circuit Judge for a Summary Judgment or Directions for further Hearings the Court did not reply to a single one of emails. The original Application Notice that I submitted to the Court challenge all of the Judge’s rulings since Claim inception was submitted on 21/13 June 2021, soon after I was ordered to pay the Costs of the Defendant of £4170.

 

3. Until the Full Written Reasons for the following proceedings are made available to me the private prosecution and litigation must continue:

(a) Why the Injunction against Kent Police at Medway County Court failed.

(b) Why East Kent Magistrates Court could not find the Case Number for the private prosecution of the Chief Constable of Kent Police from its own records.

(c) Why the stalking and harassment that I was held as a suspect on by Kent Police on 5+2 occasions was considered a criminal matter and not a civil matter.

(d) Why Maidstone Crown Court would not facilitate my counter-prosecution against Kent Police from 2017 onwards.

(e) Why the matter of my Claim against Wigmore Medical Centre in the first of two Claims that I lodged at the County Courts Money Claims Centre never got past the initial hurdle of approval.

(f) Why I was told by the Central London County Court that the Hearing that was presided over by District Judge Lightman would be a Pre-Trial Hearing on me.

(g) Why the North Kent Magistrates Court never entertained my application for overturning the Bail conditions imposed on me by Kent Police.

(h) Why the Charge Refused Certificate from Kent Police attached (ChargeRefusedCertificationfromKentPolice-1.pdf) are entirely different from the original offences of Stalking and sending Malicious Communications.

 

4. If you can find out the answers to this at the eleventh hour, that would go some way towards me withdrawing my complaint against you at the Legal Ombudsman.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

 

On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 13:01, forz khan <FK@thechambersoffkhan.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Dr Panigrahi

Is there anything else you would like to add?

Has the private prosecution finished now?

Kindest regards.

F. Khan.

Counsel.

Middle Temple.

Trinity 1988.

The Chambers of F. Khan, London

Direct Mobile - 07854 109 584  -  Email - FK@TheChambersofFKhan.co.uk

Regulated by The Bar Standards Board     

Confidentiality Notice

 This email is confidential. If you are not the addressee do not use it at all. Instead email it back to the sender and delete it. This email and attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving. We will not be liable for any damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or any viruses being passed on.

Important Notice

All emails sent to or from this address will be received by The Chambers of F. Khan Email System and may be subject to archive and review. All email accounts hosted by The Chambers of F. Khan are corporate email accounts. These accounts and their contents remain the property of The Chambers of F. Khan. They are not personal email accounts and must not be used for the purpose of exchanging Sensitive Personal Information as defined by the Data Protection Act 1998 (1998 c29).

 

Sent: 06 May 2024 10:41

Subject: Re: Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister/Chambers

        

Dear Mr Khan

You delayed the private prosecution.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

 

Yahoo Mail: Search, organise, conquer

 

On Mon, 6 May 2024 at 9:03 am, forz khan

            <FK@thechambersoffkhan.co.uk> wrote:

Dear Dr Panigrahi

 

Thank you for your email

I will deal with the matter as a formal complaint in accordance with the complaints policy of chambers - further copy attached.

I am unable to respond to a complaint unless I know exactly what it is that I have alleged to have done incorrectly.

Please can you send me a detailed breakdown of your assertions so I can respond.

Kindest regards.

F. Khan.

Counsel.

Middle Temple.

Trinity 1988.

The Chambers of F. Khan, London

Direct Mobile - 07854 109 584  -  Email - FK@TheChambersofFKhan.co.uk

Regulated by The Bar Standards Board     

Confidentiality Notice

 This email is confidential. If you are not the addressee do not use it at all. Instead email it back to the sender and delete it. This email and attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving. We will not be liable for any damages arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or any viruses being passed on.

 Important Notice

 All emails sent to or from this address will be received by The Chambers of F. Khan Email System and may be subject to archive and review. All email accounts hosted by The Chambers of F. Khan are corporate email accounts. These accounts and their contents remain the property of The Chambers of F. Khan. They are not personal email accounts and must not be used for the purpose of exchanging Sensitive Personal Information as defined by the Data Protection Act 1998 (1998 c29).

 

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Sent: 05 May 2024 12:09

Subject: Official Complaint against Forz Khan barrister/Chambers

            

Dear Mr Forz Khan

 

In view of your silence concerning the £3000 that I paid the Firm with a contractual agreement for a private prosecution against Kent Police in the Magistrates Court or the Crown Court, but you did not act quickly enough for my purposes I asked you to refund that money; following which you refused to get involved in the civil litigation against the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in Central London County Court under Claim E35YM660 wherein I demanded £100 million in damages and compensation for the 26 years that I suffered from defrauding me of my severance payment of £55,000 by the University of Greenwich, MI5 engineered trolling terrorism under the guise of Victims of Panigrahi Association, police brutality by Kent Police, North Yorkshire Police, West Yorkshire Police, the Independent Office for Police Conduct, terrorism through Banks and Institutions such as Employment Business, The Financial Services Ombudsman, The Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman, persecution for being a Hindu, intensive perverting of the course of justice and obstruction of justice; I put it to you that you were well aware that both Police authorities and the other security services were above the law and your demand for £3000 to lead me astray was perverse.

 

 The Bar Standards Board has informed me that you have 4 weeks to reply to me on this complaint following which the matter will go to the Legal Ombudsman for a decision in accordance to my subsequent findings as linked here: https://www.thelibertariandemocrats.com/forum/diary-of-the-author/5-may-2024-11-27-am-uk-time   

 

Yours sincerely

 

 Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

 3 Hoath Lane

 Wigmore

 Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

 United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

____________________________________________________________________

Thank you for your enquiry

Inbox

 

from:    Enquiries <Enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     8 May 2024, 13:18

subject:               Thank you for your enquiry

mailed-by:         legalombudsman.org.uk

Signed by:          legalombudsman.org.uk

security:             Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

Legal Ombudsman

 

Thank you for your email

 

We are currently dealing with a high volume of enquiries.

 

If you already have a case with us, we will add your email to the file. A colleague will be in touch with you just as soon as they review your email.

 

If you are contacting us for the first time about a complaint, please be aware that it may take around 12 weeks before you hear from us, and at that stage, we may need to ask you for more information. We thank you for your patience and would like to reassure you that our teams are working very hard to review and respond to your email as quickly as possible.

 

Once we have confirmed that we have all the information we need, we will write to you to let you know that we have passed your case for formal assessment by an investigator.

 

Please be aware that there is a considerable wait for a case to be assessed by an investigator, which varies depending on the complexity of the case. More information about the wait times will be included in the letter we send to you at the time the case is added to a queue and can also be found on our website.

 

If you have concerns about the wait times and feel they may detrimentally impact on you or your case, for example, because of a financial hardship or serious health concern, please let us know. 

Have you complained to your service provider?

 

We can only investigate a complaint once the service provider has had the chance to investigate it and respond. This means you need to make a formal complaint to them first. You can find further information on our website about how to complain to your service provider, including a template complaint letter.

 

How to complain to us

 

If you have already complained to your service provider and have not received a satisfactory response, then we might be able to help. The easiest way to check if we can help you is to use our complaint checker tool on our website. Alternatively, you can send us a completed complaint form, which is available to download from our website.

 

We will need your completed complaint form, along with a copy of your complaint to the service provider and copies of any responses you have received from them. Please only send us copies and not original documents.

 

You should be aware that we are also unable to accept documents from an online document storage facility such as Dropbox.

Do not send us any other information until we request it.

If you need to write to us, our address is:

Legal Ombudsman

PO Box 6167

SLOUGH

SL1 0EH

 

Our telephone number is 0300 555 0333. We are open from 9am to 4pm from Monday to Friday. Calls may be recorded and used for training and monitoring purposes.

Have we let you know we have passed your case for assessment?

If we have already let you know your case is awaiting assessment by an investigator, you do not need to do anything further at this stage. An investigator will contact you when they start working on the complaint.  Please note that you may be waiting a considerable time before your case will be passed to an investigator. The letter we have sent to you should provide you with more specific information about these timescales. We also aim update you every three months.

 

Supporting you in making a complaint

 

You can find out more about how we work and how we can help you by visiting our website (www.legalombudsman.org.uk). Here you will find a copy of our complaint form and information about how to complain, along with useful factsheets.

 

We are committed to making sure the way we work does not put you at a disadvantage so in addition to our legal duty to provide reasonable adjustments for disabled people, if you need any help or support, please tell us about it and we will do our best to meet your needs.  We also understand that your circumstances might change, along with the support that you need, so please let us know at any time and we will consider your request.

 

If you are requesting personal data under Freedom of Information or the Environmental Information Regulations or would like a copy of personal data under Data Protection please email infosec@legalombudsman.org.uk

 

Visit our website to find out how we use your personal data.

For information on how we handle your personal data, see our privacy notice. www.legalombudsman.org.uk/privacy This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments. Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free. The Legal Ombudsman does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Legal Ombudsman for operational or business reasons.

____________________________________________________________________

Automatic Reply from BSB Contact Us

Inbox

from:    BSB Contact Us <contactus@barstandardsboard.org.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     8 May 2024, 13:20

subject:               Automatic Reply from BSB Contact Us

mailed-by:         barstandardsboard.org.uk

Signed by:          Barcouncil.onmicrosoft.com

security:             Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

THIS IS AN AUTOMATED RESPONSE – PLEASE DO NOT REPLY

Thank you for contacting the Contact and Assessment Team of the BSB.

If you are seeking to make a report

Please use our online reporting form which is available here. This will ensure that your report is properly logged and will help to provide us with the information we need to complete an assessment of your concern.

If you have already made a report

We receive a large number of reports and it is currently taking us at least eight weeks to complete an initial assessment. We will contact you once we have completed our assessment, although we may be in touch with you before then if we need more information about your concern. Please note that we can’t give detailed updates on the progress of our assessments.

If you are a barrister making a report about another barrister under rule rC66 of The BSB Handbook, we will only contact you if we need more information. You won’t be informed of the outcome of our assessment.

You can read about our process for assessing information here.

If you are making a general enquiry

Answers to frequently asked questions and a link to our Contact Form can be found here.

We try to answer all queries within 5 working days. If we need to pass your enquiry to another team, we will let you know. If that happens, please allow extra time for a response.

Please note we won’t be able to give advice or answer queries about specific conduct or applications.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660 Inbox from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> to:          constitution@parliament.uk, pacac@parliament.uk cc:         Central London DJSKEL <centr

zoom: no help forthcoming

zoom Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Forz Khan Khan Tue, 21 May at 11:50 Dear Forz Thank you for your email this morning: I have done what you asked me to do: https:/

Automatic reply: VALID CASE

Automatic reply: VALID CASE Inbox from:    Technical Advice <technical.advice@legalombudsman.org.uk> to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> date:     21 May 2024, 11:04 subject:

Comments


bottom of page