Not Properly Instituted EA-2023-000673 Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v The University of Greenwich
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
date: 1 Jul 2023, 13:55
subject: Fwd: Not Properly Instituted EA-2023-000673 Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v The University of Greenwich
The Appeal at EAT was originally lodged in 1999 and the Notice of Appeal at EAT was considered properly instituted for the President of the EAT then had made judgment a copy of which I do not have any longer. Your response this morning confirms that the entire Judicial System is racked against me as racial discrimination which has resulted in Defamation and millions in lost damages and compensation from the various parties associated with the co-conspirators. Even Maidstone Crown Court to whom the attached correspondence was sent under Appeal is a racist insitution of the Judiciary with the rest of them. No Justice system can cater for the needs of a Hindu Indian that has suffered for 26 years in the United Kingdom with such blatant racial prejuduce: ToNorthKentMagistratesCourtccMaidstoneCrownCourt(RACIAL PREJUDICE OF NORTH KENT MAGISTRATES COURT AGAINST DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI).pdf.
Accordingly you can stuff your proceedings where it belongs as you had intended to do in 1999 and clearly intented to do now by sending me this email after the fiasco of the intercommunications between ET Croydon last Friday that showed conspiracy against me, you racist pigs.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Kent ME8 0SL
• Scanned by Gmail
EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
Fifth Floor, Rolls Building, 7 Rolls Buildings
Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL
Telephone : 020 7273 1041
Facsimile : 01264 785 028: