Notification from The Conservative Lib

Notification from The Conservative Lib

Inbox

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          "Administrative Court Office, Case Progression" <administrativecourtoffice.caseprogression@justice.gov.uk>

date:     6 Jun 2025, 07:56

subject:               Fwd: Notification from The Conservative Lib

mailed-by:         gmail.com

Your Honour

In respect of the emergence of fresh new proceedings: https://archive.org/details/judicial-review-progression-digital_20250606_0716

https://archive.org/details/there-is-no-money-in-truth-digital_20250607

it may be noteworthy that from 9 November 2001 I began a process of seeking a Judicial Review at the Administrative Court of the Royal Courts of Justice, of all Medway County Court Orders and decisions concerning proceedings under Claim Numbers SO806411, ME002953, and ME010463. I stated that I am a victim of a miscarriage of justice perpetrated by the British Criminal Justice System-associated individuals. The court titled the case, 'The Queen on the application of Panigrahi versus Medway County Court' and gave a Case No of CO/1680/2002. On 23 April 2002 Mr Justice Keith passed an order In the High Court of Justice, Queens Bench Division Administrative Court: The Claimant is under the impression that permission to proceed with his claim for judicial review has already been granted. That is incorrect. Permission has not been granted. In order for the court to decide whether permission should be granted the Claimant must (a) identify the decisions of Medway County Court which he wishes to challenge, (b) state the basis upon which he alleges that they are amenable to judicial review and (c) explain why permission to challenge them should be granted. I therefore direct the Claimant to lodge with the Administrative Court Office by 4.00 pm on Friday 3 May (a) copies of the orders of Medway County Court which he wishes to challenge, and (b) a statement setting out the basis upon which he alleges that they are amenable to judicial review and why permission to challenge them should be granted. If the claimant fails to comply with these directions, the claim will be struck out.' I wrote back on 30 April 2002: Dear Sir, Please send me a copy of the Defendant's response in order that I may reconsider the merits of my Application in the light of the Defendant's evidence.'

2. Please assess this morning's terrorism https://www.theconservativelibertariansociety.com/forum/main/comment/483ef1b1-c054-4211-a406-9479897a89ec?postId=673c274e448491347e348041  in that light.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 079677 89619

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited <notifications@forums.wix.com>

Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 at 07:47

Subject: Notification from The Conservative Lib

To: "Shantanu Panigrahi" <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

person

Chan Bianca Commented On a Post

Hi Shantanu Panigrahi,

Chan Bianca commented on a post "Octogenarian (MBE) Rosemary Stevenson building her own Care Home for friends in her village" in the forum, The Conservative Lib.

mp4 dvd 書き込み

Check It Out

This message was sent to shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com

If you'd prefer not to receive these messages in the future, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.