top of page
Search

OUTCOME OF HEARING 17 OCTOBER 2023

OUTCOME OF HEARING 17 OCTOBER 2023

Inbox


from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to: Toby Burrough <tburrough@burroughs-solicitors.co.uk>

date: 18 Oct 2023, 08:33

subject: Re: OUTCOME OF HEARING 17 OCTOBER 2023

mailed-by: gmail.com


Dear Mr Burrough


There will be an appeal against any sentence if that comes out of Folkestone Magistrates Court in 1-2 weeks’ time or subsequently on 10 November 2023, 2 pm Trial Hearing which I will not attend (whichever way the authorities wish to proceed) as you have determined from your assessment of the legalities involved.


Further there will be counter prosecution against Kent Police and the Magistrates Court officials for criminal conspiracy against me on the grounds that at the initial stage of Pre-Trial Hearing, I was offered the opportunity to discuss the details of my plea with the North Kent Magistrates Court, as shown in the attached communication: Notice of New Date of Hearing NKMC.docx, and this was withdrawn, with a Magistrate deciding to send the matter to Trial instead.


So please standby for further instructions.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619


On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 07:50, Toby Burrough <tburrough@burroughs-solicitors.co.uk> wrote:

Dr Panigrahi, thank you for the further detail.


Your plea should have been guilty, you admit you are guilty of the offence. It is just the punishment that you disagree with.


The fact you were offered a speed awareness course, does not affect your guilt. This is an out of court disposal. If you could not make the date booked for whatever reason, Kent police do not have to offer an alternate date. The offer of the course is discretional. The course must be completed within a set period of time. It is possible that due to you cancelling the course, there was insufficient time for a further course to be offered.


It is for this reason a conditional offer of a fixed penalty was put to you. You can not simply offer to pay a fine and not have penalty points. The offer is of a fine and points. Again if you accept guilt you should have accepted the offer.


The fact the matter has now gone to trial for no “good reason” means you are liable for far more costs, and a fine dependant upon your income. This will be far in excess of the fixed penalty.


I would await the outcome of the hearing. You should be notified within 1-2 weeks. At that stage let me know and we can decide if it is worthwhile appealing the sentence, although that would be to the Crown Court and is likely to be prohibitively expensive.


It is a shame you did not obtain legal advice far earlier in this matter.


Toby Burrough – Partner

38 King Street Maidstone Kent ME14 1BS

Tel 01622 676982 or 01622 676976

Partners Tobias Burrough & Simon Rogers

Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Number 60665

Cybercrime Alert: Bank Details

Please be aware that there is a significant risk posed by Cyber fraud, specifically affecting email accounts and bank account details. PLEASE NOTE that our bank account details WILL NOT change during the course of a transaction, and we WILL NOT change our bank details via email. If in any doubt, please be careful to check account details with us in person. WE WILL NOT accept responsibility if you transfer money into an incorrect account.

NOTE: This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended only for the addressee. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the person for whom it is intended, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or reply mail.

Please note this firm does not accept service by way of email.


From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 7:03 PM

To: Toby Burrough <tburrough@burroughs-solicitors.co.uk>

Subject: Re: OUTCOME OF HEARING 17 OCTOBER 2023


Dear Mr Burroughs

In my original plea the following was entered:


Online plea - SJP

Case details


Unique reference number46/SJ/13271/23


Posting date04/05/2023Number of offences1You arePerson named on the notice


Your details


First nameShantanuLast namePanigrahiAddressAs printed on the noticeContact number07967789619Date of birth08/08/1957Email addressshantanupanigrahi@yahoo.comNational Insurance numberYZ330724DUK driving licence numberPANIG508087S98CL


Your plea


Charge 1


Exceed 50 mph speed limit in contravention of a Local Traffic Order - manned equipment


Your plea Not guilty Not guilty because I was told by Lucy at Kent Police that I am entitled to a Speed Awareness Course as I had never been offered one. So I booked a Speed Awareness Course paying £92 to Kent County Council and having a date of 11 January 2023 to complete this task. Due to mitigating circumstances in that I was embroiled in legal matters relating to Claim E35YM660 of the Central London County Court as Claimant and J00ME572 at Medway County Court that has now reached the Court of Appeal, I applied for a rescheduling of the Speed Awareness Course but well within the deadline for its completion. Kent Police for reasons of its own cancelled my Speed Awareness Course and sent me a Conditional Notice of Liability instead. I appealed against this but it did not respond. Then I said to the Police that I would pay the extra £8 without the Points on my Licence since it was Kent Police's fault that the Speed Awareness Course was cancelled unjustifiably in my assessment. When Kent Police did not reply to this submission, I offered to pay the £100 Fine and have the 3 Points on my Licence. Kent Police did not reply to this offer either. I have never challenged the possibility that I might have exceeded the 50 mph speed limit but am appealing to the Court that Kent Police has been unreasonable in not enabling me to discharge my liability that I always wanted to.


Interpreter requiredNo


Disagree with any evidence from a witness statement?Yes


Name of the witness and what you disagree with: I have not had the time to read the documents and I am a mental patient unable to understand the documents after Patterson Law the solicitors who I negotiated to act on my behalf on this matter let me down by backing off the Case. But my version as given above is the truth.


Wants to call a witness?No


Your finances

StatusNot completed/provided Financial details must be collected at hearing.


2. I then changed my plea from not guilty to guilty and the Hearing was shifted to Folkestone Magistrates Court as attached: FrSandraWhiteKentCPO(R v Dr Panigrahi 465J327153)9Oct2023.docx.


I was citing mitigating circumstances which I clarified in full over a few month period; and my inability to attend in person due to being a mental patient with paranoid schizophrenia who could not engage in meaningful conversations at a Hearing, was the reason it would appear that the Folkestone Magistrates Court and North Kent Magistrates Court have not been replying to my email communications: ToNorthKentMagCrtKingsBenchHighCrtKentPoliceOralesi(Gord&Thompson)HAS A DECISION BEEN MADE YET16Nov2023.docx.


So I have not a clue which Court is dealing with the Speeding matter and when it would be held. For this reason I need a new Criminal Defence Lawyer, the others I consulted found the complexity was beyond their expertise to handle


I hope this information gives you all that is necessary to be able to let me know whether you will take instructions from me.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619


On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 17:50, Toby Burrough <tburrough@burroughs-solicitors.co.uk> wrote:


Dr Panigrahi, thank you for your email.


From what I can gather there was a trial listed today at 1400. This was to decide if you were speeding on the A229 on the 5th October 2022. I presume you previously entered a not guilty plea.


The hearing was listed for 10th November but was then brought forward to today.


If you wished to dispute the allegation and deny that you were speeding on the5th October 2022, you should have been in attendance to give your evidence. If you were not present, then the trail can proceed in your absence. This would have meant only the prosecution (police) evidence would have been before the court.


Were you aware of today’s hearing? If so when were you made aware of it?

Toby Burrough – Partner

38 King Street Maidstone Kent ME14 1BS

Tel 01622 676982 or 01622 676976

Partners Tobias Burrough & Simon Rogers

Authorised and Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Number 60665

Cybercrime Alert: Bank Details

Please be aware that there is a significant risk posed by Cyber fraud, specifically affecting email accounts and bank account details. PLEASE NOTE that our bank account details WILL NOT change during the course of a transaction, and we WILL NOT change our bank details via email. If in any doubt, please be careful to check account details with us in person. WE WILL NOT accept responsibility if you transfer money into an incorrect account.

NOTE: This e-mail transmission is strictly confidential and intended only for the addressee. It may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the person for whom it is intended, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or reply mail.


Please note this firm does not accept service by way of email.


From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 5:13 PM

To: Toby Burrough <tburrough@burroughs-solicitors.co.uk>

Subject: Fwd: OUTCOME OF HEARING 17 OCTOBER 2023


To

Alliance House

38 Kings Street

Maidstone

MB14 1BS

tburrough@burroughs-solicitors.co.uk

01622 322 796


Dear Sirs

I am seeking a Criminal Defence Lawyer in relation to a Speeding Offence that is highly disputed as shown below.

Is this something you can assist me in?

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619


---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 16:59

Subject: OUTCOME OF HEARING 17 OCTOBER 2023

To: eastkentmc <eastkentmc@justice.gov.uk>

Cc: <driver.diversion@kent.pnn.police.uk>


Folkestone Magistrates Court


Dear Sirs


I am eagerly anticipating the outcome of the Hearing today rescheduled from North Kent Magistrates Court from 10 November 2023, 2 pm to 17 October 2023 to take place in my absences as forwarded here and in connection with the attached summons: LetterfromNKMCHearingTrial10Nov2023_2pm.pdf.


Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.


Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi (Defendant)

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619


Forwarded:


Criminal Defence Lawyer Needed


from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to: eastkentmc <eastkentmc@justice.gov.uk>

date: 6 Oct 2023, 19:51

subject: Fwd: Criminal Defence Lawyer Needed

mailed-by: gmail.com

To

Folkestone Magistrates Court Court No. 1965

Court :Folkestone Magistrates Court

Address :The Law Courts

: Castle Hill Avenue

: Folkestone

: CT20 2DH map of location

Country :England

Telephone: 01303 227800

Fax: 01304 213819

Opening hours: Court building open: Monday to Friday 9:00am to 4pm

Email: eastkentmc@justice.gov.uk

Website https://courttribunalfinder.service.gov.uk/courts/folkestone-magistrates-court


Dear Sir/Madam


I was very surprised if not aghast when Sandra White asked me if I was wishing to attend the Court on the 17 of October 2023 when it was listed to be decided without my presence, and when I explained the situation she did not clarify what further needed to be done on the matter of submitting additional evidence in writing. This is a complaint against her that I have asked a Defence Solicitor to look into as the below correspondence will show.


Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619


One attachment

• Scanned by Gmail:


Notice of New Date of Hearing NKMC.docx

North Kent Magistrates’ Court (1966)

Sitting at Medway Magistrates Court

ALL ENQUIRIES: PO BOX CH4, The Courthouse, The Brook, Chatham, ME4 4JZ

Tel: 01634 830232, Fas: 0870 324 0037 Email: northkent@justice.gov.uk

Office Opening Hours: 9.00am to 5pm, Monday to Friday

__________________________________________________________________________________

Dr Shantanu PANIGRAHI

3 HOATH LANE

WIGMORE

GILLINGHAM

KENT ME8 0SL


Case number: 0462300074226


Notice of new date of hearing


New date, time and place

The court has adjourned the cases listed below:

To 1 June 2023 at 10.00 am at Medway Magistrates’ Court, The Courthouse, POBx CH4, The Brook, Chatham, Kent, ME44JZ (telephone 01634 830232)

No one need attend on this date.


Reasons

The matter has been adjourned because

1. If you wish to maintain your NG plea and attend for a trial as to whether you are guilty of speeding offence. If you accept the offence was committed by yourself, you may wish to plead guilty and request that the Magistrate’s deals with the case with the same level as a Fixed Penalty given the explanation you have put forward.

Iy you require the assistance of an interpreter at the next hearing you must inform the court promptly on receipt of this notice.

By Order of the Court

Justices’ Clerk

Date: 4 May 2023


Cases

462300074226/1

On 05/10/2022 at Boxley om the county of Kent drove a motor vehicle, namely a FORD FIESTA TITANIUM TURBO – 5 DOOR SALOON Iindex GH17AZZW, on a road, namely A229 Chatham Road, subject to a local traffic order, namely The Kent Council (Various Roads, Maidstone) (Speed Limits) (Consolidation)Order 2020, at a speed exceeding 50 miles per hour.

Contrary to the above local traffic Order and sections 84 and 89(1) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and Schedule 2 to the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988.


Dr Shantanu PANIGRAHI 8 May 2023/ADNO_44_01/-12740/1


10 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

FURTHER HARASSMENT CLAIM E35YM660

FURTHER HARASSMENT CLAIM E35YM660 Yahoo/Inbox Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Central London DJSKEL Thu, 20 Jun at 15:08 To Circuit Judge Central London County Court Your Honour

CLAIM E35YM660

CLAIM E35YM660 Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Central London DJSKEL Tue, 18 Jun at 15:30 To Circuit Judge Central London County Court Your Honour The investigations

IS THIS OF INTEREST?

IS THIS OF INTEREST? Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:georgia.moss@legalvision.co.uk Tue, 18 Jun at 12:00 Dear Georgia I thought that you should be aware of this sinis

Comments


bottom of page