Panigrahi v Theresa May (Cabinet Office) - E35YM660 - Defendant's note setting out position in advan
Panigrahi v Theresa May (Cabinet Office) - E35YM660 - Defendant's note setting out position in advance of hearing on 20 January 2023
Inbox
Jessica Da Costa
Attachments09:30 (2 hours ago)
Dear all Further to my email below I now attach a note on behalf of the Defendant in advance of tomorrow’s hearing. Please contact me if you have any queries. K
Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
Attachments
11:19 (28 minutes ago)
to Jessica
Dear Ms Costa
The premise of your arguments are grossly faulty: I personally made an Application Notice to the Court on an Application Notice not on behalf of my wife Rashmi Panigrahi, but for myself as litigant in person. I had submitted three Application Notices after discussions with my wife that I contend that I am not mentally ill or disordered in way. This was during the week following the 21 June 2021 Order of District Judge Lightman. I paid £100 as Court Fee, When no actions was taken by the Court on the Application Notice and I was severely terrorised by the Security Services of the Cabinet Office in government the particulars of Claim changed over the past 18 months which makes the Application Notice submitted by me then as redundant (null and void) and a fresh new Application to take account all the facts of the matter that are contained in the skeleton arguments and bundle combined that you have received a copy of through omar sager at the Government Legal Department would be necessary except that I have not yet considered this matter while there is still time for an out-of court settlement now that the government has finally responded to me after dozens of emails, including to the Attorney General. The Hearing is accordingly unconstitutional for this essential factor. Your bundle should therefore consider all the details of the facts in the attached link: Running Commentary on Legal Proceedings (Claim E35YM660): Dr S. Panigrahi vs Prime Minister of UK (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/running-commentary-on-legal-proceedings-claim-e35ym660-dr-s-panigrahi-vs-prime-minister-of-uk
and my application to the Court of Central London to have the Hearing aborted: APPLICATION TO ABORT THE HEARING OF 20 JANUARY 2023 (CLAIM E35YM660) (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/application-to-abort-the-hearing-of-20-january-2023-claim-e35ym660
I have already approached the Court of Appeal to register the points as attached here:ToCourtiofAppealccCenLonCtyCrtKentPolice(LACK OF COMMON COURTSEY IS CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD THE CLAIMANT IN CLAIM E35YM660).docx; and is a matter for Kent Police.
Please acknowledge receipt of this email immediately.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 at 09:30, Jessica Da Costa <Jessica.DaCosta@governmentlegal.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear all
Further to my email below I now attach a note on behalf of the Defendant in advance of tomorrow’s hearing.
Please contact me if you have any queries.
Kind regards
Jessica
Jessica Da Costa
Deputy Director and Team Leader of Attorney General & General Private Law Team 2
Home Office and Immigration Division, Government Legal Department
102 Petty France, Westminster, London SW1H 9GL
Direct Dial: 0207 210 3270
Fax: 0207 210 3433
Mobile: 07788320170
Jessica.DaCosta@governmentlegal.gov.uk
https://gld.digital (BETA) helping you navigate law in government – our new legal website.
GLD accepts service by email. See https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/government-legal-department.
Due to COVID-19 and the current circumstances I would appreciate any documentation being sent by e-mail rather than by post to limit the handling of materials
From: Jessica Da Costa
Sent: 19 January 2023 09:13
To: 'Enquiries.centrallondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk' <Enquiries.centrallondon.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>; 'centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk' <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>
Cc: 'Shantanu Panigrahi' <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>; 'rashmipanigrahi2000@yahoo.co.uk' <rashmipanigrahi2000@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Panigrahi v Theresa May (Cabinet Office) - E35YM660 - Defendant's schedule of costs for hearing on 20 January 2023.
Dear all
I have taken over conduct of this matter.
I attach by way of filing and service the Defendant’s costs schedule for tomorrow’s hearing.
I hope to send an updated bundle for use at the hearing later in the day.
Yours faithfully
Jessica Da Costa
For the Treasury Solicitor
Jessica Da Costa
Deputy Director and Team Leader of Attorney General & General Private Law Team 2
Home Office and Immigration Division, Government Legal Department
102 Petty France, Westminster, London SW1H 9GL
Direct Dial: 0207 210 3270
Fax: 0207 210 3433
Mobile: 07788320170
Jessica.DaCosta@governmentlegal.gov.uk
https://gld.digital (BETA) helping you navigate law in government – our new legal website.
GLD accepts service by email. See https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/government-legal-department.
Due to COVID-19 and the current circumstances I would appreciate any documentation being sent by e-mail rather than by post to limit the handling of materials
The information in this e-mail belongs to HM Government and may be confidential or otherwise protected by law. If you received it in error, we request that you inform us by return e-mail and then delete it immediately, without printing, copying or disseminating it.
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with MessageLabs. HM Government does not however warrant that it is virus free at point of delivery.
One attachment
• Scanned by Gmail:
ToCourtofAppealccCenLonCtyCrtKentPolice(LACK OF COMMON COURTSEY is CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD T
.
Download • 14KB