PROCEEDINGS: SUMMONS FOR ARREST OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF KENT POLICE MR ALAN PUGHESLEY
Yahoo
/
Sent
Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>
To:
Northkent Magistrates Court,
Eastkentmc Magistrates Court,
maidstonecrowncourt
Fri, 30 Sept at 12:42
To
The Magistrates Court at
North Kent Magistrates Court
Medway Magistrates Court
East Kent Magistrates Court
Maidstone Crown Court
Dear Sirs
At 11.40 am, I dialled the Control Room at Kent Police through 101 and spoke to the operator about the attached interrogation and arrest of myself from 21 September 2021 and 24 November 2021 NorthKentPoliceReleasewithoutbail. in connection with which I had issued the attached Injunction of a Hate Crime being perpetrated on me by the Force: Document_2002-05-13_152026.pdf.
The lady I spoke to could not associate this matter with any Crime Number or Incident Number after taking my name, address and date of birth that she could locate on her computer. I said to her that WPC Field was dealing with it because a few months ago I had spoken with this police officer and was told that the investigation was still in progress and they will then decide whether the matter will go to the Crown Prosecution Service to determine if there was sufficient evidence of an offence that I was suspected of having committed, namely harassing Kartina Sale of the Conservative and Unionist Party. But as the arrest document shows, it is not listed as being harassment, just others which could mean that Kent Police were keeping their options open to charge me with other offences that it was not disclosing but which could emerge from examination of the desk-top computer, Amazon Fire, USB Memory Stick and my Mobile phone that it seized from us. Originally PC Nichols was dealing with the matter in Kent Police as I explained to the Control Room Staff. I asked if I could speak with PC Nichols and/or WPC Field. She said PC Field is the Complaints officer have you filed a complaint. I said Yes to Professional Standards Department, but I never received their Report on it. I said further since over a year had passed by from the date of my interrogation and subsequent arrest I need to know if the investigation is now complete or whether the matter has been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service. On a previous occasion I had asked Kent Police to remove the Biometrics data on fingerprints and DNA taken off the records that they took when I was held in custody. As things stand this has not been done. I asked the Control Room Staff for information on when the materials seized from our property would be returned to us for originally, we were told that this would happen within 3 months of the seizure of the property. I could not get any information from the Control Room lady. All she would say is what they have said on other previous occasions that I felt I should try and find out what is happening that they would send an email to Nichols and PC Fields and ask them to contact me. Today I asked them to contact me during the rest of the day as today is a Friday. She said she could not promise that this would happen even though PC Field is currently on duty at the Police Station.
The injunction that I sought in Medway County Court under Claim J00ME572 is equally unclear to me as to its disposal. I claimed £3.5 million from Kent Police for the Hate Crime. I refer also to the arrest warrant that was dealt with at East Kent Magistrates Court two years ago against the Chief Constable of Kent Police for harassment of me, that did not yield a satisfactory result and all my attempts to seek information have been ignored. The counter prosecution against Kent Police at Maidstone Crown Court is also unclear.
This is also the case with Claim E35YM660 of the Central London County Court, CO/1680/2002 of the Administrative Court of the High Court Kings Bench and HQ17X01773 of the Queens Bench Judges Listing Office.
Other representations were made to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and today to the Speaker of the House of Commons as attached: ToLyndsayHoyle(SpeakerHOC)29Sep2022; ToSpeaker(HOC)ccKentPoliceMedCtyCrtCenLonJudiciaryAdminCourt30Sep2022.docs, without any kind of acknowledgement let alone resolution of the matter under consideration or dispute.
So I am requesting HMCTS under the Right to Information Act to provide me the necessary update on these proceedings hereby. Please let me know the procedure to follow.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
Tel: 07967789619
Download all attachments as a zip file
NorthKentPoliceReleasewithoutBail.pdf 1.2MB
Document_2022-05-13_152026.pdf 5.9MB
ToLyndsayHoyle(SpeakerHOC)29Sep2022.docx 15.7kB
ToSpeakerHOCccKentPoliceMedCtyCrtCenLonJudiciaryAdminCourt30Sep2022.docx
14
____________________________________________________________________
Auto-Reply
Yahoo
/
Inbox
eastkentmc <eastkentmc@justice.gov.uk>
To:
Shantanu Panigrahi
Fri, 30 Sept at 12:43
Thank you for your email.
We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.
Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.
Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.
If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.
Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/
Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you
Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals planning and preparations
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
____________________________________________________________________
Automatic Response
Yahoo
/
Inbox
northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>
To:
Shantanu Panigrahi
Fri, 30 Sept at 12:43
Thank you for your email.
We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.
Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.
Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.
If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.
Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
____________________________________________________________________
Automatic reply: PROCEEDINGS: SUMMONS FOR ARREST OF THE CHIEF CONSTABLE OF KENT POLICE MR ALAN PUGHESLEY
Yahoo
/
Inbox
maidstonecrowncourt <maidstonecrowncourt@justice.gov.uk>
To:
Shantanu Panigrahi
Fri, 30 Sept at 12:43
DO NOT REPLY
Thank you for contacting Maidstone Crown Court. This Automated Response confirms that we have received it.
We will try to reply to your email within 10 working days. We may take longer to reply to you.
We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible. Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner. Please refrain from sending emails to multiple accounts including personal email accounts this could result in your email being incorrectly distributed.
If your query is urgent, please call the Crown Court General Office on 01622 202 000.
Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.
If you are unsure as to how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.
Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals planning and preparation
Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/
For court forms and leaflets (including the court fees leaflet), please go to:
http://hmctsformfinder.justice.gov.uk/HMCTS/FormFinder.do
Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.