RE: Auto Reply Croydon ET3
Yahoo
/
Sent
Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>
To:
LONDONSOUTHET
Fri, 30 Jun at 11:42
Dear Sir/Madam
I was under the impression that you had forwarded this correspondence to the Employment Appeal Tribunal which sent an email to me as attached: FrEmployment AppealsTribunal(UniversityofGreenwich)29Jun2023.
Perhaps there have been some crossed lines.
Nevertheless, I do not any longer have the Case Number at the Ashford Hearing Centre from July 1999. I did not make a record of it and I sincerely hope that you are able to look through your archives to find it. If not kindly assign a new Case Number Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs the University of Greenwich, and send me the ET Form to complete afresh and I will do so. The attached EATForm1 2013 (University of Greenwich).docs may be of assistance to you for this process.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
On Friday, 30 June 2023 at 09:59:56 BST, LONDONSOUTHET <londonsouthet@justice.gov.uk> wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your email copied below.
Would you please resubmit with your case number in the Subject field to enable us to take any further action.
Yours faithfully,
Michael Chandler
Clerk to the Tribunal Office
Casework Team | HMCTS | Montague Court, 101 London Road | Croydon | CR0 2RF
Phone: 020 8667 9131
gov.uk/hmcts
HM Courts & Tribunals Service logo
Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you
From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>
Sent: 29 June 2023 08:30
To: LONDONSOUTHET <londonsouthet@Justice.gov.uk>
Subject: Re: Auto Reply Croydon ET
To
South London Employment Tribunal
Dear Sirs
My primary reason for having copied you into this email is that I hold some grudge against three institutions, most notably the University of Greenwich that dismissed me unfairly in 1998 October, Shell in 2009 and Sainsburys later that were brought to the Employment Tribunal. The Case was filed at the Tribunal in June 1999.
The University of Greenwich was fully aware that I have a congenital mental disorder of paranoid schizophrenia that Dr Rao of BUPA said manifest itself as severe depression with psychotic features and the Unition IPMS was negotiating medical retirement for me from the University but when this became clearly obvious it chose to dismiss me from employment instead to cover up the workplace harassment in conspiracy with the World Poultry Science Association and British Poultry Science Limited as well as British Society of Animal Science. I had considerable difficulty in obtaining the necessary evidence of the role that these conconspirators played in termininating my scientific career at the University and was accumulating evidence which delayed my registration of the case at the employment tribunal so that I asked the Tribunal to force that evidence to call on these insitutions to submit their evidence under oath.
The medical retirement from the University of Greenwich was totally justified as I had similar problems in coping with the business environment at Shell and Sainsburys who also dismissed me from employment subsequently.
I did not attend the Tribunal Hearing fearing that it would be set up as a kangaroo court in my mental state of mind and so chose to take the matter to the Employment Appeals Tribunal and subsequently to the Court of Appeal all to no avail. This led me to think that there was a national conspiracy against me not just in the workplace but also in the judicial systems of the United Kingdom and especially since I lodged a Defamation case against the University of Greenwich at Medway County Court to no effect.
Not only was I deprived of the roughly £10,000 pounds per annum from the University of Greenwich until my retirement I was denied redundancy money of £55,000 as severance pay.
This is just for the record. The Tribunal erred in its decision and I would be grateful if you would acknowledge this fact ahead of the Hearing that would decide the matter on 10 November 2023 at 2.00 pm at Medway Magistrates Court where vulnerable as I am being a mental patient as you will note from the contents of the Dossier that you received, Kent Police is continuing to investigate me for having been responsible for sending harassing, stalking and malicious communications to various people and institutions.
If there was any justice in the United Kingdom, the Tribunal should revisit the evidence and Order the University of Greenwich to pay me 23*£10,000=£230,000 as the amount due to me under the prevailing terms of its Medical Retirement Scheme.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
On Thursday, 29 June 2023 at 06:51:59 BST, LONDONSOUTHET <londonsouthet@justice.gov.uk> wrote:
IMPORTANT INFORMATION COMMUNICATION WITH THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL Thank you for your email which has been safely received by the Employment Tribunal. Please do not call us for further confirmation of receipt. This will allow us to deal with your correspondence more efficiently. Always send correspondence by email unless it is not possible for you to do so. We will deal with all queries as soon as possible. Repeat calls or emails on the same matter may interrupt the administrative process. When sending any correspondence to the tribunal (except when making a request for a witness to give evidence at a hearing), you must also send a copy to all other parties. Your communication may not be considered until you have taken this step, so please make it clear that you have done this in your correspondence or explain why you have not done so.
Please note that new claims (ET1 form) cannot be accepted by email. The quickest and easiest way to send us a claim form is by using our online submission service which you can access here: https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunals. Any response forms (ET3) will need to be checked by a judge before they are accepted. This reply is only confirmation of receipt. The administrative staff of HMCTS working for the Employment Tribunals continue to do so under great pressure. It will greatly assist efficient administration if parties only write to the Employment Tribunals when they need to do so, such as to make an application requiring judicial attention. Correspondence between the parties that is needlessly copied to the tribunal office will not be placed on file or receive a response.
You can find various documents (such as Presidential Guidance) which are relevant to how Employment Tribunals deal with particular types of cases and the various ways in which hearings may take place at https://www.judiciary.uk/publications/employment-rules-and-legislation-practice-directions/
For general enquiries on the process or information on how Employment Tribunals operate, guidance can be found at www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/employment. For information on the services provided by ACAS, please visit their website at www.acas.org.uk or call their helpline on 0300 123 1100. For information on how HMCTS uses personal data about you please see www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal-information-charter.
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
Show original message
Download all attachments as a zip file
FrEmploymentAppealsTribunal(UniversityofGreenwich)29Jun2023.docx 15kB
EAT Form 1.doc 2013 word doc(UniversityofGreenwich).docx 18.7kB:
Comments