top of page
Search

RE: Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK our ref: CA-2023-000750

Updated: Jul 22, 2023

RE: Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK our ref: CA-2023-000750

Yahoo

/

Inbox

Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To:

ravina@olivessolicitors.com


Fri, 21 Jul at 06:22



Dear Olives Solicitors


Please note the update shown below and take the necessary action.


Thank you


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel 07967789619

Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android


----- Forwarded message -----

From: "Shantanu Panigrahi" <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To: "civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk" <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>, "Northkent" <northkent@justice.gov.uk>, "Force Control Kent" <force.control@kent.police.uk>, "administrativecourtoffice.generaloffice@hmcts-service.x.gsi.gov.uk" <administrativecourtoffice.generaloffice@hmcts-service.x.gsi.gov.uk>

Cc:

Sent: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 17:09

Subject: RE: Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK our ref: CA-2023-000750

Your Honour


Thank you for your email.


I need more time to consider the proceedings that are under the Court of Appeals above reference number than the 7 days that you have permitted because of the complexities inherent in the fact that the civil proceedings are highly dynamic in nature in the 10 November 2023 2 pm Trial Hearing at North Kent Magistrates Court, and that a Judicial Review proceedings is in place right now at the High Court under Case No CO/1680/2002.


Furthermore, Kent Police is currently considering whether to charge me with offences for allegedly Stalking, and sending malicious communications so the outcome of its consideration in terms of the several millions of pounds that I have demanded with an apology would have to be known before CA-2023-000750 is closed by the Court of Appeal notwithstanding the concerns stated by the jurisdiction lawyer Levey.


If these proceedings do not progress matters to a just resolution by 10 November 2023, the Court of Appeal will have jurisdiction to list a Hearing.


If the Court of Appeal disagrees, please let me know as soon as possible.


Thank you.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi (Appellant)

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 08967799619


Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android


On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 at 14:13, Civil Appeals - Registry

<civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk> wrote:

Dear Sir/Madam,


Your papers were referred to theY Jurisdiction Lawyer Levey of the Court of Appeal who has asked me to inform you of the following:


I refer to the appellant’s notice filed by the applicant seeking permission to appeal various orders, including those of HHJ Parfitt and DJ Lightman. The date given in section 2 of the appellant’s notice is 15 April 2023.


No order dated 15 April 2023 has been provided. However, the following orders have been filed:


The order of HHJ Parfitt of 19 January 2021 - The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against a Circuit Judge sitting in the County Court (see article 5 of the Access to Justice Act 1999 (Destination of Appeals) Order 2016). An appeal lies instead to a High Court Judge. Furthermore, there is no right of appeal against a refusal of permission to appeal (see section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999).

The order of DJ Lightman dated 21 June 2021 - The Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from a decision of a District Judge. An appeal lies instead to a Circuit Judge, sitting in the County Court, pursuant to article 5(3) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 (Destination of Appeals) Order 2016.


Accordingly, this Court has no jurisdiction in respect to the orders filed.


Unless the applicant files an order in respect to which this Court does have jurisdiction within 7 days, this matter will be closed.


Kind Regards,


Mr Keith De Bordes


Civil Appeals Office| Room E308 | Royal Courts of Justice Strand | London | WC2A 2LL | DX 44456 Strand | Tel: 0207 947 7784 | Email: Civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk

gov.uk/hmcts


This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

12 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

CLAIM E35YM660

CLAIM E35YM660 Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Central London DJSKEL Tue, 18 Jun at 15:30 To Circuit Judge Central London County Court Your Honour The investigations

IS THIS OF INTEREST?

IS THIS OF INTEREST? Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:georgia.moss@legalvision.co.uk Tue, 18 Jun at 12:00 Dear Georgia I thought that you should be aware of this sinis

Re: Digital PR

Re: Digital PR Inbox from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> to:          Leslie Morgan <leslie@websitemakings.com> date:     18 Jun 2024, 11:46 subject:               Re: Digital PR

Comentarios


bottom of page