RE: Petition to the Monarch * OFFICIAL *
RE: Petition to the Monarch * OFFICIAL *
Inbox
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: "Administrative Court Office, Case Progression" <caseprogression@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk>
cc: "Administrative Court Office, General Office" <generaloffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk>,
listoffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
date: 20 Jun 2023, 16:15
subject: Re: Petition to the Monarch * OFFICIAL *
mailed-by: gmail.com
Dear Sir/Madam
1. With your permission I should explain that this is a Case Progression matter on which the following developments took place at the Administrative Court of the High Court:
On 22 November 2000 I received a letter from Buckingham Palace from a Chief Correspondence Officer, Mrs Deborah Bean, stating, 'The Queen has asked me to thank you for your letter of 9th November expressing your wish to petition her on a 'rascism' matter. As a constitutional Sovereign, Her Majesty acts on the advice of her Ministers, and I have, therefore, been instructed to send your letter to the Lord Irvine of Lairg, the Lord Chancellor, so that he may know of your approach to Her Majesty on this matter, and may consider the points you raise'. The Court Service from Southside, 105 Victoria Street wrote a letter dated 21 December 2000: Thank you for your letter of 9 November 2000 to the Queen. Your letter has been passed to the Court Service which is responsible for the administration of the Crown and county courts in England and Wales. The Court Service is an Executive Agency of the Lord Chancellor's Department. You say you are a claimant in a civil case and you require a N150 form. This form is available from all county courts. It is not clear at what stage your case has reached. I am unable to give you any legal advice, however, you may wish to consider consulting a solicitor at your own expense or a Citizens Advice Bureau where you can obtain free legal advice. I am sorry that I cannot be of any further help in this matter. The Court Service in Victoria wrote under TO1934. I wrote back that my petition concerns a ‘racism matter’ in the Administration of Justice and telephoned the Court Service in Southside Victoria Street London to discuss the complaint.
On 25 May 2002 I wrote to the French Consulate General for asylum to go and live in France, copying the letter to the Administrative Court and asking to be informed of the final outcome of Case no CO/1680/2002. Mr Justice Keith of the Administrative Court passed an Order dated 3 July 2002 that permission to apply for Judicial Review is hereby refused because 'despite being required to lodge with the Administrative Court a statement setting out the basis on which the Claimant alleges that these decisions are amenable to judicial review and why permission to challenge them should be granted, no such statement has been lodged. There is therefore no basis on which permission to proceed with the claim for judicial review can be granted. In addition, now that the decisions which the Claimant wishes to challenge are known, it is plain that this application for permission to proceed by way of judicial review is out of time.' I wrote back under Notice for renewal of claim for permission to apply for judicial review that, 'With due regard to the judgement made, not all the decisions which the Claimant wishes to challenge were available to me until now. The attached document is still under consideration at Lewes Appeal Centre. This application for Judicial Review to prevent the further perverting of the course of justice is therefore not out of time. On 5 August 2002 the Administrative Court wrote that the permission application has been listed for oral hearing on 20 August 2002. I wrote back asking who the other parties are for the Hearing and the Court Room and Time, but no reply was received. On 23 August 2002 Mr Justice Collins of the Administrative Court passed an Order under notification of the Court's decision following an oral hearing on the renewed application for permission to apply for Judicial Review that permission be refused: no attendance from either parties.
2. In regard to these continuing proceedings, North Kent Magistrates Court and Kent Police continue to maintain the silence of secrecy as attached: ToNorthKentMagCrtKentPoliceForce(Judicial Review and Public Enquiry)20Jun2023.docx
3. I have already spent £432 as Court Fee to HMCTS recently on my Appeal that has not materialised into a Judgment or Order and do not wish to have to pay a further sum of money as Court Fee for the Judicial Review unless the High Court absolutely expresses this requirement from me.
Please advise as soon as possible.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 11:10, Administrative Court Office, Case Progression <caseprogression@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk> wrote:
Good morning,
Thank you for your email.
Please be informed that if you wish to lodge a Judicial Review at the High Court, you will need to refer to our guidance which you can find by clicking on the following link: The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2022 (judiciary.uk)
Furthermore, the Case Progression team does not deal with the issuing of new proceedings. All new applications should be lodged via the General Office inbox (the address can be found in my signature), as per above mentioned Judicial Review guidance.
Kind regards,
Lucia Meloni
Case Progression Officer | Administrative Court Office
King’s Bench Division | HMCTS | Royal Courts of Justice| Strand, London | WC2A 2LL
Phone: 020 7947 6655 (Option 6)
Web: www.gov.uk/hmcts
If replying by email, please use the following address:
caseprogression@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
Daily Cause List: http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/court-lists/list-rcj
Listing Enquiries: listoffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
General Enquiries: generaloffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
Criminal & Extradition Enquiries: crimex@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
Skeleton Arguments: london.skeletonarguments@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
For information on how HMCTS uses personal data about you please see: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal-information-charter
cid:image001.gif@01D82D47.B41AC1D0
From: Shantanu Panigrahi [mailto:shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 June 2023 07:38
To: Administrative Court Office, Case Progression <caseprogression@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk>
Subject: Fwd: Petition to the Monarch
Dear Sir/Madam
A couple of years ago I had enquired on the prospects for a Judicial Review on my petition to the late Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth which has presumably been passed down to HIs Majesty Charles III, now.
I wished to have a Public Enquiry on the proceedings dating back to 1998 and have asked the present Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice to update me on the matter.
This matter as the situation stands now is appropriate for a Judicial Review before the Public Enquiry is instituted by Parliament.
I am therefore requesting the Administrative Court for action today.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
Tel: 07967789619
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 07:02
Subject:
To: <alex.chalk.mp@parliament.uk>
To
Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
Parliamentary office
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA
Phone: 020 7219 8087
Email: alex.chalk.mp@parliament.uk
Dear Sir
I did not receive any objections from who were served notice I over the past 24 hours to the need that I have for a Public Enquiry (attached: Rehman ChishtiPublicEnquiry.pdf), a matter that I have corresponded with my local MP Right Honourable Rehman Chishti over the past 6-7 years; and with various members of Parliament including the Speakers over the past 20 years.
This concerns the entire functioning of the Judicial and Law Enforcement systems of the United Kingdom as experienced by me over the past 26 years.
As my MP will no doubt vouch, I have been through all the due processes of accessing justice including petitioning the late Monarch Elizabeth II twenty years ago which she had referred to the Lord Chancellor then (Lord Irvine of Lairg).It amounted to nothing and I am still without any severance pay from the University of Greenwich since my dismissal from that employment in 1998, and the unjustifiable loss of £4170 due to a decision of the County Court of Central London that I should have to pay the costs of the Cabinet office in respect of litigating against the Prime Minister under Claim E35YM660.
The Law Enforcement system as implemented by Kent Police for and against me are a total shambles such that there was no prospect of satisfactory justice unless Kent Police in complicity with Magistrates Court established a kangaroo court to try me in a witch hunt cover up of all my experiences that indicate systematic persecution on me and my family.
Please ensure that the relationship between the State of the United Kingdom and the International Criminal Court as far as personal grievances aired are part of the Public Enquiry.
I should therefore be grateful, if you would now let me know as soon as possible whether the matter that I am complaining about should be investigated in a Parliamentary Public Enquiry, such is the vastness of correspondence that has taken place on the matter within the United Kingdom and beyond that needs to be brought together.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
____________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
____________________________________________________________________
===========
The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and are intended for the use of the correct recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please contact the author immediately. It is an offence to disclose or distribute the contents of this email and/or any attachments without consent of the author.
If your email has not been acknowledged or answered within 5 working days, or if you have difficulty reading this email or any attachment included, please contact the author on the number quoted above.
The author is not authorised to bind the Department contractually, or to make representations or other statements which may bind the Department in any way via electronic means.
===========
____________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
____________________________________________________________________
One attachment
• Scanned by Gmail
ToNorthKentMagCrtKentPoliceForce(Judicial Review and Public Enquiry)20Jun2023.docx:
Judicial Review and Public Enquiry
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: Northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>,
Force Control Kent <force.control@kent.police.uk>
date: 20 Jun 2023, 08:39
subject: Judicial Review and Public Enquiry
mailed-by: gmail.com
Dear Sir/Madam,
Following my communication to you yesterday without reply, please note that I am awaiting decisions in respect of the attached proceedings: LetterfromNKMCHearingTrial10Nov2023_2pm.pdf; Kent Police Extended Bail.pdf.
The attached correspondence refers: PETITION TO THE MONARCH-digital.pdf.
Thank you for your kind attention.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
3
Attachments
• Scanned by Gmail
LetterfromNKMCHearingTrial10Nov2023_2pm.pdf
Kent Police Extended Bail.pdf.
PETITION TO THE MONARCH-digital.pdf:
(a)
North Kent Magistrates’ Court (1966)
Sitting at Medway Magistrates Court
ALL ENQUIRIES: PO BOX CH4, The Courthouse, The Brook, Chatham, ME4 4JZ
Tel: 01634 830232, Fas: 0870 324 0037 Email: northkent@justice.gov.uk
Office Opening Hours: 9.00am to 5pm, Monday to Friday
____________________________________________________________________
Dr Shantanu PANIGRAHI
3 HOATH LANE
WIGMORE
GILLINGHAM
KENT ME8 0SL
[Received: 11.30 am 7 June 2023]
Case number: 0462300074226
Born: 8 August 1957
URN: 46SJ1327123
Summons on Referral to Court
A magistrate has decided that your case should be referred to a full court hearing
On 10 November 2023 at 2.00 pm
At Medway Magistrates’ Court
The Courthouse, PO Box CH4, The Brook, Chatham, Kent, ME4 4JZ (telephone 01634 830232).
Reason
For trial
Attendance
If you attend court, you must arrive 30 minutes before the time shown above. A listing time is not a guaranteed hearing time. You may be required to wait.
Warning
If you do not attend, the court may still deal with the case in your absence. If the court does not have up to date information about your financial circumstances you maybe ordered to pay a fine that is more than you can afford.
Date: 1 June 2023
Cases
Charge initiated by: Chief Constable KENT POLICE of Medway Police Station, Pursers Way, Eastbridge, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 1NE
462300074226/1 Date of Charge: 05/04/2023
Prosecutor Reference: 2300XX0000000004742D
On 05/10/2022 at Boxley om the county of Kent drove a motor vehicle, namely a FORD FIESTA TITANIUM TURBO – 5 DOOR SALOON Index GH17AZZW, on a road, namely A229 Chatham Road, subject to a local traffic order, namely The Kent Council (Various Roads, Maidstone) (Speed Limits) (Consolidation)Order 2020, at a speed exceeding 50 miles per hour.
Contrary to the above local traffic Order and sections 84 and 89(1) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and Schedule 2 to the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988.
The sentence for this offence can be endorsed on your driving record
____________________________________________________________________
Dr Shantanu PANIGRAHI 2 June 2023/SUMRTC_47_0/8298/1
North Kent Magistrates’s Court
Code 1966
____________________________________________________________________
Referral to Full Court Hearing
Your case was considered by the court under the single justice procedure. However, owing to the reasons given, your case has now been referred to a hearing before a full magistrates’ court. For information on the reason, see below.
For trial
At the next hearing, the magistrates will receive evidence either in the form of written statements or from any witnesses that attends court. You must attend, and bring with you any witness that you will call to give evidence on your behalf. If you do not agree with any statement being read to the court, you must inform the prosecution immediately.
Advice and help
If you need advice on what to do you should get help from a lawyer or advice agency at once. If you cannot afford a lawyer, you may be able to get free advice about your case. For more information see
www.lawsociety.org.uk/for-the-public/common-legal-issues/criminal/
Do not wait until you come to court.
If you need any general help about this summons contact the court office. PLEASE NOTE: Court staff are not able to give you specific advice on how to respond to the allegation.
Dr Shantanu PANIGRAHI 2 June 2023/SUMRTC_47_0/8298/1
(b)
Kent Police OFFICIAL Generated Date: 28/03/2023
Defendant
Mr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 HOATH LANE, WIGMORE, GILLINGHAM
KENT ME8 0SL
Bail to Police Station – Variation of Date/Location
Custody Record Number 46XA/1546/23
Custody Station Medway
cer in Case PC 46 14767 Corbishley
On 10/06/2023 07.59, you were granted bail, following your arrest on reasonable suspicion that you had committed an offence/s namely
Offence Committed Arrest Date/Time
Malicious Communications 28/03/2023 09.32
Malicious Communications 28/03/2023 09.32
Malicious Communications 28/03/2023 09.32
I write to advise you that your bailed to time or Police Station has been changed.
You must now attend Medway Medway Police Station, Purser Way, Gillingham, Kent on 28/09/2023 16:00.
The reason for this re-bail is: New ABP.
Please note:
If your bail has conditions attached, these bail conditions will still apply.
It is your responsibility to notify your legal representative of the change of your bail details.
Sgt 46 12826 Pereira
Custody Record No: - 46XA/1546/23
____________________________________________________________________
Information to suspects released on bail
Bail legislation is contained with the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, as amended in 2017 &
2022.
If released on bail the following is applicable:-
. You must surrender to custody at the date and time as specified above
. You will be subject to an Applicable Bail Period (ABP). The ABP covers a period that you can be
bailed within by the Custody Officer before it is reviewed to ensure the investigation is being dealt
with diligently and expeditiously and to ensure that bail is still necessary and proportionate.
. If initially you were released on bail before 28/10/2022 the ABP was authorised by a Police
Inspector for 28 days. The ABP can be reviewed, and an extension for another three calendar
months may be authorised on or before 28 days, by a Police Superintendent. Further extensions can
be authorised at 3 calendar month intervals thereafter.
. If initially you wre released on bail after 28/10/2022 the ABP was authorised by the Custody Officer
for 3 calendar months. The ABP can be reviewed, and an extension for another 3 calendar months
may be authorised, on or before 3 calendar months, by a Police Inspector. Further extensions can be
authorised at 3 calendar months intervals thereafter.
. If your case is being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office, or the Financial Conduct Authority, or
HM Revenue and Customs, or National Crime Agency, the initial ABP for these dases is six months
authorised by the Custody Officer. However, the police do not authorise extensions for these cases.
This must be done by a designated officer for those agencies.
5
. If your case has been immediately referred to the Crown Prosecution Service the ABP will not start
unless they require the investigators to carry out further work.
. You or your legal representative= will be informed of theintention to apply for an extension to the
ABP either in person if at the police station or by your preferred means of contact. You will be asked
if you want to make any representations either immediately if in person by return of post/email etc.
. Early reviews will be conducted by relevant decision makers and later ones will be conducted by
the Courts.
. The ABP will be suspended for the time that the cas3e is sent back to the Crown Prosecution
Service.
. You will be informed of the decision and the relevant time and date of the end of your ABP.
. You will also be informed of the actual date and time you are due to answer bail. This may be the
same or a different time to the end of an ABP.
. The consequence of all the above is that your bail date can be subject to several amendments.
However a reasonable attempt will always be made to notify you of any changes, in writing to the
address that you have provided to the police (or the preferred method of contact), and/or via your
legal representative if you have one.
It is important that you notify OIC of any change of your address, your legal representative, or other
point of contact, and that you provide us with any current phone numbers and email contact details.
By doing so, we may be able to prevent you having to attend needlessly at a custody suite if we
know (especially at short notice) that you have a new, later bail date or other information change
(such as ‘No Further Action’.
¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬
Custody Record No: - 46XA/1546/23
____________________________________________________________________
Police Advisory Notice to Suspects
If you are involved in criminal proceedings, the following summary of potential offences is included
for your information and awareness. The same offences will also be brought to the attention of any
relevant victim or witness for their information. The list of offences is NOT exhaustive.
The purpose of this is to make clear to all involved parties that any unlawful, unnecessary or
inappropriate contact between the suspect in a case (either directly or through a third party), and
the victim or witness may constitute a criminal offence.
Any unlawful, unnecessary or inappropriate contact reported to the police, including any perception
that this is the case, may result in arrests and prosecution of parties for any of the following offences
Intimidation of witnesses, jurors & others
Under 5.51 of the Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 it is an offence to intimidate or threaten
by any means any person involved in the investigation of an offence relating to criminal matters.
____________________________________________________________________
In summary proceedings A fine and/or maximum six months imprisonment
On indictment A fine and/or maximum five years imprisonment
____________________________________________________________________
‘Harassment’
Under S.2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, it is an offence for a person to pursue a
course of conduct which amounts to harassment of another, and which he/she knows or ought to
know amounts to harassment of the other, or to persuade any person not to do something that they
are entitled or required to do, or to do something that they are not under any obligation to do.
___________________________________________________________________
In summary proceedings A fine and/or maximum six months imprisonment
On indictment: A fine and/or maximum two years imprisonment
Please note that other, more serious, offences are also provided for under the Protection from
Harassment Act 1997
____________________________________________________________________
Perverting the Course of Justice
Under Common Law, it is an offence to conspire, act or embark upon a course of conduct which has
a tendency to, and is intended to pervert, the course of public justice.
Some of the ways where conduct is capable of amounting to this offence is by making false
allegations, perjury, concealing offences, obstructing the police, assisting others to evade arrest,
failing to prosecute, interfering with witnesses/evidence/jurors, and publication of matters
caluculate to prejudice a fair trial.
___________________________________________________________________
On indictment: Maximum LIFE imprisonment
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Postal Charging
This leaflet explains Postal Charging and answers some questions you may have.
What is Postal Charging?
This is a method of bringing an offender before a court for prosecution.
It means that you could be charged and required to attend court by post without returning to a
police station.
Can I be charged by post?
If you have been in police custody and you are granted unconditional police bail to return to a police
station at a later date you may be charged by means of a ‘postal charge’ if a decision is made to
charge you.
How does it work?
If a decision is made to charge you at least 14 days before you are due to answer your bail you may
receive a ‘charge’ and a ‘requisition’ to attend court through the post.
Will I still be on Police bail?
Once a postal charge and requisition has been issued you will no longer be on police bail for that
offence.
What do I do if I receive a Postal Charge?
You will recxeive a charge/requisition form (MG4D). This will state the offence(s) with which you are
charged. This will require you to attend court at a specified date and time.
___________________________________________________________________
If you fail to attend court when required a warrant will be issued for your arrest. If this happens, If
this happens you may be held in custody until the next available date
___________________________________________________________________
If you do not receive a postal charge or a bail cancellation notice you must answer your police bail at
the date and time shown on your bail form.
____________________________________________________________________
Custody Record No: - 46XA/1546/23
____________________________________________________________________
Automatic Response
Inbox
from: northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>
to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
date: 20 Jun 2023, 08:41
subject: Automatic Response
mailed-by: justice.gov.uk
Signed by: justice.gov.uk
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
Thank you for your email.
We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.
Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.
Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.
If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.
Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
____________________________________________________________________
Automatic reply: Petition to the Monarch * OFFICIAL *
Inbox
from: Administrative Court Office, Case Progression <caseprogression@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk>
to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
date: 20 Jun 2023, 16:15
subject: Automatic reply: Petition to the Monarch * OFFICIAL *
mailed-by: mail2.bemta37.messagelabs.com
Signed by: administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
* OFFICIAL *
The Administrative Court Office Case Progression Team are currently experiencing a high volume of emails, however we will endeavour to respond to your email within 3 working days. If your email is of an urgent nature please refer to page 46 (para 7.8.2) and pg 208 (Annex 8) of the ACO Guide for guidance: Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2022 - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary<https://www.judiciary.uk/courts-and-tribunals/high-court/administrative-court/administrative-court-judicial-review-guide-2022/>
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
Automatic reply: Petition to the Monarch * OFFICIAL *
from: Administrative Court Office, General Office <generaloffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk>
to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
date: 20 Jun 2023, 16:16
subject: Automatic reply: Petition to the Monarch * OFFICIAL *
mailed-by: mail2.bemta37.messagelabs.com
Signed by: administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
* OFFICIAL *
We acknowledge receipt of your email. It will be treated as incoming correspondence and will be dealt with within the usual timescales. If you have used this address to submit a skeleton argument, it has been sent to the wrong address and you must resend it immediately to london.skeletonarguments@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
Administrative Court Office General Office Tel: 020 7947 6655
_____________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
Automatic reply: Petition to the Monarch * OFFICIAL *
from: Administrative Court Office, List Office <listoffice@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk>
to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
date: 20 Jun 2023, 16:16
subject: Automatic reply: Petition to the Monarch * OFFICIAL *
mailed-by: mail2.bemta37.messagelabs.com
Signed by: administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
The Administrative Court List Office are currently experiencing a high volume of emails, however will endeavour to respond to your email within 5 working days.
* OFFICIAL *
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________