This has been an eventful day so far as my sincerely held belief and perseverance has finally yielded the just rewards from the decision of Medway County Court to serve my proceedings against Kent Police for its Chief Constable Hugh Pughesley to address as shown in the Notice of Issue attached:
The following correspondence is also significant in this respect:
Information Received - Review Letter - OTP-CR-76/22
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: OTP InformationDesk <otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int>
date: 13 May 2022, 07:29
subject: Information Received - Review Letter - OTP-CR-76/22
mailed-by: gmail.com
To
Mark P Dillon
Office of the Prosecutor
International Criminal Court
Dear Sir
I thank you for your email that I received yesterday 12 May 2022, 15.25 hours UK Time, from which the following relevant extract is revisited for the attention of the State authorities in the United Kingdom as per your suggestion that proceedings at the International Criminal Court are legitimate but need to be compatible and consistent with simultaneous proceedings within the nation states that the Claimant is pursuing justice in.
Should there be any new developments from this point of view i will bring it to your attention in accordance with the attached Claim Form: n1-engKentPolice UpdateMay 2022.pdf.
I trust you would read it before archiving the submission in the Court's records.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantnanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Wigmore
Gillingham
Kent ME8 0SL
United Kingdom
Tel: 07967789619
Forwarded:
On behalf of the Prosecutor, I thank you for your communication received on 13/01/2022, as well as any subsequent related information.
As you may know, the International Criminal Court (“the ICC” or “the Court”) is governed by the Rome Statute, which entrusts the Court with a very specific and carefully defined jurisdiction and mandate. A fundamental feature of the Rome Statute is that the Court may only exercise jurisdiction over persons for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, namely genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. These crimes are carefully defined in the Rome Statute (Articles 6 to 8) and further elaborated in the Elements of Crimes, adopted by the assembly of States Parties.
Based on the information currently available, the conduct described in your communication does not appear to fall within these stringent definitions. Accordingly, as the allegations appear to fall outside the jurisdiction of the Court, the Prosecutor has confirmed that there is not a basis at this time to proceed with further analysis. The information you have submitted will be maintained in our archives, and the decision not to proceed may be reconsidered if new facts or evidence provide a reasonable basis to believe that a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court has been committed.
I hope you will appreciate that with the defined jurisdiction of the Court, many serious allegations will be beyond the reach of this institution to address. I note in this regard that the ICC is designed to complement, not replace national jurisdictions. Thus, if you wish to pursue this matter further, you may consider raising it with appropriate national or international authorities.
I am grateful for your interest in the ICC. If you would like to learn more about the work of the ICC, I invite you to visit our website at www.icc-cpi.int.
Yours sincerely,
Shantanu Panigrahi
shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com
Mark P. Dillon
Head of the Information & Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor
Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands
Boîte postale 19519, 2500 CM La Haye, Pays Bas
Telephone / Téléphone: + 31 70 5158515 • Facsimile / Télécopie: + 31 70 5158555 • http://www.icc-cpi.int
Notre référence: OTP-CR-76/22
La Haye, jeudi 12 mai
Post Office Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, The Netherlands
Boîte postale 19519, 2500 CM La Haye, Pays Bas
Telephone / Téléphone: + 31 70 5158515 • Facsimile / Télécopie: + 31 70 5158555 • http://www.icc-cpi.in
Attachments area
n1-engKentPolice Update May 2022.pdf