top of page






Medway County, Enquiries <>


Shantanu Panigrahi

Thu, 11 Aug at 13:52

Good Afternoon,

The notice of discontinuance is a final document which you filed. You cannot apply to set this aside as it was you who discontinued the claim, and more notably from your email:

I should make it clear to the Medway County Court that my decision remains final and should Kent Police have any allegations of stalking or harassing Katrina Sale, BP and BLM Law for which it has evidence that I have not seen, I am willing to face prosecution in a criminal court as Kent Police in conjunction with the Crown Prosecution Service decides. I will therefore have no part to play in any J00ME572 proceedings at Medway County Court as the Claimant. In regard to this request had already asked the Court for permission for discontinuance of the Injunction and Money Claims Application but the Court has not informed me of the outcome, and instead sent me a Notice of Directions Hearing for 27 October 2022 at 10.00 am.

Accordingly, the Defendant is hereby required to send me its Costs for the proceedings to date which I will duly consider now.

In case the Medway County Court refuses to grant me Permission to Discontinue the Claim immediately on receipt oI this email I am appealing the decision of the Court at the Court of Appeal herewith.

At the point you received directions, you had not discontinued the claim, then you filed a notice of discontinuance after being informed that all you needed to do was file a N279.

We then discontinued your claim and the defendant did not ask for costs. This matter is now closed.

Kind Regards,


Civil Section - Medway County Court


Medway County and Family Court, 9-11 The Brook, Chatham, ME4 4JZ

Phone:01634 887900


For Information regarding COVID-19 and HMCTS, please click here: COVID-19

For information on how HMCTS uses personal data about you please see:

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <>

Sent: 11 August 2022 12:38

To: Medway County, Enquiries <>



The Court Manager

Medway County Court

Dear Sir/Madam

It is unfortunate for me that the Court has decided to discontinue with this Claim, despite my protestations which as the Court is aware was appealed up to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom.

Notwithstanding, I wish to immediately reinstate the Injunction Application against Kent Police represented by the Chief Constable Alan Pughesley together with the Money Claims Application in accordance with the documentations submitted by both Parties up to now, the reason being that the full scale of the persecution that I have experienced in national and international conspiracy against me has just been made apparent, as you will note from the following correspondence, and should be added to the BUNDLE already submitted. I would require a Hearing of the Case on what was previously allocated as being 27 October 2022, at 10.00 am.

I have already paid £100 to Her Majesty's Court Service in the Central London County Court, but if I need to pay an additional amount for the reinstatement, kindly let me know by treating this email as the Application Notice.

If for any reason this Application is not upheld as deserved, kindly let me know so that I can lodge an Appeal at a higher Court of Law.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane



Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619

----- Forwarded message -----Fw: Update on Pre-Action Protocol issued by BLM Law

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <>

To: Kirsty Bloomfield <>

Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2022 at 11:26:49 BST

Subject: Re: Update on Pre-Action Protocol issued by BLM Law

Dear Kirsty Bloomfield

I need to act fast so am also assuming that you were responding to the attached email that I sent you earlier this morning: Removal, by Execution, of Prime Minister (India) from the gene-pool (

Removal, by Execution, of Prime Minister (India) from the gene-pool

Removal, by Execution, of Prime Minister (India) from the gene-pool Inbox from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpani...

Can you recommend me a Solicitor or Law Firm who deals with issues of Stalking and Harassment? - Ideally, the Firm should be in the Medway Towns so that I can visit them in their offices.

Please bear with me for in the past 20 years I have tried 60 plus Solicitors/Law Firms/Barristers Direct Access unsuccessfully so word of mouth might finally get me legal representaiton through you.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane



Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619

On Thursday, 11 August 2022 at 09:43:16 BST, Kirsty Bloomfield <> wrote:

Good morning

Thank you for your email.

We are specialist family lawyers and are not able to assist you with this matter.

Yours truly

specialist family lawyers

27 High Street| Rainham| Kent| ME87HX|

0800 038 58 28

Please note that we are no longer on the DX. We are a paperless office and would prefer to receive all communications by email. Where this is not possible, please send to 27 High Street, Rainham, Kent ME8 7HX

This Email is the property of Beckett Solicitors and is intended solely for the addressee(s). It is strictly confidential and may also be legally privileged. If you are not the addressee please do not read, print, re-transmit, disclose, store or act in reliance on it or any attachment. Instead please Email the message back to the sender and then immediately permanently delete it.

Beckett Solicitors is a trading name of Beckett Bloomfield Legal Services Ltd which is regulated in England & Wales under registration no. 11143169 and which is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under no 647173. The Registered office of Beckett Bloomfield Legal Services Ltd is 27 High Street, Rainham, Kent ME8 7HX and the Directors are Nadia Beckett and Kirsten Bloomfield.

Cybercrime and fraud – if you receive an email giving you details of a new bank account for payments to us it will not be genuine and it will not be from us. If you send money to that account you will lose it. Please contact us immediately if you receive such an email.

We accept no responsibility or liability for malicious or fraudulent emails purportedly sent by this firm. It is your responsibility to ensure that any emails coming from Beckett Solicitors are genuine before you rely on anything contained within them.

If you like what we do, please leave a review:- -

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <>

Sent: 10 August 2022 19:27

To: Kirsty Bloomfield <>

Subject: Fw: Update on Pre-Action Protocol issued by BLM Law



Type:Recognised body law practice

SRA ID:647173SRA



Head officeAddress:27 High Street,




ME8 7HX,


Dear Beckett Bloomfield Legal Services Limited

Could you assist me with legal representation in relation to the following harassment matter?

I would be grateful for a quick reply as the matter is very urgent, in relation to proceedings pending at Medway County Court (Claim Number J00ME572) for which this Law Firm has been asked by me to absent itself for its corrupt practices, as outlined n the documents.attached.

If you cannot assist me I will look for another Law Firm to do so.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane





Tel 07967789619

----- Forwarded message -----

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <>

To: <>; Orla Scanlan <>; <>

Sent: Wednesday, 10 August 2022 at 19:13:27 BST

Subject: Update on Pre-Action Protocol issued by BLM Law


Clyde Bank/BLM Law

Dear Sirs

1. I need to know what the present state of affairs is with respect to the attached two emailed documents that BLM Law sent me indicating that I had a case to answer at some unknown Court of the United Kingdom, and that you had initiated a Pre-action Protocol in this regard: 2022.06.01 Dr Panigrahi letter out pdf; 2022.06.07 Dr Panigrahi letter out (1) pdf.

2. If I do not receive a reply from you within 24 hours the matter will be place at the hands of my Solicitor/Law Firm.

Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane



Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

16 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Re: Follow-Up Note

Re: Follow-Up Note Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi To:Harshita Singh Thu, 23 May at 13:17 Dear Harshita Singh 1. In the United Kingdom, there is no justice in the Judici


bottom of page