top of page

Shantanu Panigrahii's Daily Bulletin

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Search

Application that Summons to Court is Invalid

Application that Summons to Court is Invalid


from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to: Northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>

date: 16 May 2023, 19:37

subject: Application that Summons to Court is Invalid

mailed-by: gmail.com


Dear Sir/Madam


1. I spoke to Ravina at Olives Solicitors at just after 4.30 pm today to ask her whether they had received any communication from Kent Police on the twin proceedings of Speeding Offence and Malicious Communications/harassment/blogging following my enquiry to the Attorney General and another Solicitor as attached: ToAttorneyGeneralccSalmanIslam(NFS)Bark(CriminalAnonymous email)16May2023.docx but no reply was received to this email and Olives Solicitors also did not receive any information from Kent Police today in response to the contents of this email.


2. I apologise that in my post-traumatic stress disorder I had cast aspersions on the integrity of the civil and criminal courts and tribunals of the United Kingdom and I hope you will pardon me for having done so in my email for I now realise that I may be found by the Magistrates or the Judge who presides over this matter to have been in contempt of court notwithstanding my mental disorders that Britton House has maintained silence over on regarding the attached private summons initiated and which the Court was supposed to have sent to the internal appropriate department to consider: ToMedwayMagistrates(CANCELLATION OF MY APPOINTMENT BY BRITTON HOUSE)13May2023.docx.


3. So, now there are three reasons why the 'Summons to Court is invalid':

(a) Kent County Council is still considering whether to let me do the Speed Awareness Course or refund me the £92 Fee paid for the 11 January 2023 attendance.

(b) private summons against the State authorities who 'ordered' Britton House to cancel my appointment and maintaining silence.

(c) consideration by the Attorney General that I have been for the past several years declared insidiously as being a Vexatious Litigant which could possibly explain the fact that since 1998 I have not received my £55,000 severance payment from the University of Greenwich, and the £10 million in damages and compensation from the UK Treasury for the Cyber Warfare waged on me by MI5.


4. I had requested the Magistrates at Medway Magistrates Court for an immediate decision on this Application and this has not been forthcoming in writing so I am now lodging my Appeal at Maidstone Crown Court directly that these proceedings as associated with the attached Notice of New Date of Hearing NKMC) (1).doc be judged to be null and void, given that no objections to my application was filed by the other parties as linked here: .Application that Summons to Court is invalid (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/application-that-summons-to-court-is-invalid-1


5. Please send me the Court’s full written reasons as to why the Medway Magistrates Court has rejected my Application so that I can complete the Form for submission to the Maidstone Crown Court by 5 pm tomorrow, 17 May 2023 in an email.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619

3

Attachments

• Scanned by Gmail


ToAttorneyGeneralccSalmanIslam(NFS)Bark(CriminalAnonymous email)16May2023.docx

ToMedwayMagistrates(CANCELLATION OF MY APPOINTMENT BY BRITTON HOUSE)13May2023.docx

New Date of Hearing NKMC) (1).doc


ToAttorneyGeneralccSalmanIslam(NFS)Bark(Criminal Anonymous Email)16May2023
.docx
Download DOCX • 18KB

ToMedwayMagistrates(CANCELLATION OF MY APPOINTMENT BY BRITTON HOUSE)13May2023
.docx
Download DOCX • 16KB

Notice of New Date of Hearing NKMC
.docx
Download DOCX • 16KB

____________________________________________________________________

Automatic Response

Inbox


from: northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>

to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date: 16 May 2023, 19:39

subject: Automatic Response

mailed-by: justice.gov.uk

Signed by: justice.gov.uk

security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more


Thank you for your email.

We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.

Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.

Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.

If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.

Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/


This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.


27 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

CASE PROGRESSION E35YM660

CASE PROGRESSION E35YM660 Yahoo/Inbox Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Stripe Support Fri, 26 Jul at 12:18 Dear Stripe Have you received the Court's Injunction Order? Yours since

Daily Bulletin

Subscribe for Updates From NWS Online Conference

Thanks for submitting!

©2023 by NWS. Proudly created with wix.com

bottom of page