top of page
Search

Auto-Reply from East Kent Magistrates Court

Auto-Reply

Inbox

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          eastkentmc <eastkentmc@justice.gov.uk>

date:     9 May 2024, 17:50

subject:               Re: Auto-Reply

mailed-by:         gmail.com

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

We require all the Case papers that was the basis of the decision not to issue summons; since then I was arrested on 5 occasions and was coarsely interviewed in the Police Station on a further two occasions by Kent Police acting under the authority of the Chief Constable of Kent Police. I can rectify some of the entries in the Extract of the Magistrate such as the names of the individual officers involved in the Hate Crime that subsequently was waged on me as given in the attached: ChargeRefusedCertificatefromKentPolice.pdf but do not know what the rest of the Case papers were which led to the original decision. Could you provide this for me now please?

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel 07967789619

 

On Thu, 9 May 2024 at 17:28, eastkentmc <eastkentmc@justice.gov.uk> wrote:

 

Thank you for your email.

We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible.

Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.

Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice.

If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau.

Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/

Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you

Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals planning and preparations

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

 

One attachment  • Scanned by Gmail

ChargeRefusedCertificatefromKentPolice.pdf:


ChargeRefusedCertificatefromKentPolice-1
.pdf
Download PDF • 2.81MB

13 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660 Inbox from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> to:          constitution@parliament.uk, pacac@parliament.uk cc:         Central London DJSKEL <centr

zoom: no help forthcoming

zoom Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Forz Khan Khan Tue, 21 May at 11:50 Dear Forz Thank you for your email this morning: I have done what you asked me to do: https:/

Automatic reply: VALID CASE

Automatic reply: VALID CASE Inbox from:    Technical Advice <technical.advice@legalombudsman.org.uk> to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> date:     21 May 2024, 11:04 subject:

Comments


bottom of page