top of page
Search

CA-2023-000750: JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME AT NORTH KENT MAGISTRATES COURT AND KENT POLICE

CA-2023-000750: JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME AT NORTH KENT MAGISTRATES COURT AND KENT POLICE

 

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>

cc:         Northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>,

Force Control Kent <force.control@kent.police.uk>

date:     13 Jan 2024, 08:40

subject:               CA-2023-000750: JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME AT NORTH KENT MAGISTRATES COURT AND KENT POLICE

mailed-by:         gmail.com

 

To

Court of Appeal

 

FOR THE ATTENTION OF MASTER BANCROFT-RIMMER AND LADY JUSTICE ANDREWS

 

Your Honour

 

With reference to the attached correspondence with the Court of Appeal ToCourtofAppealccJessicaDaCostaCenLonCtyCrtMaidstoneCrownCourt(ASE CA_2023-000750)30Sep2023.docx, I was coerced under duress to plead guilty to the Speeding Charge of 5 October 2022 when standing in front of the Magistrates at North Kent Magistrates Court sitting at Medway Magistrates Court and no amount of pleading for an Appeal against Conviction and Sentencing would be entertained by the Court, as linked here: APPEAL AGAINST CONVICTION AND SENTENCING: 10 NOVEMBER 2023, 2 PM TRIAL (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/appeal-against-conviction-and-sentencing-10-november-2023-2-pm-trial

 

Further, the correspondence with the Central London County Court attached ( ToJudiciaryDutyJudgeSaturday13January2024(PROCEEDINGS ON CLAIM E35YM660)12Jan2024.docx)  shows that the proceedings there were terminated a long time ago.

 

Thus for both these reasons, Master Bancroft-Rimmer must reassess Lady Justice Andrews reluctance to reconsider her Ruling submitted and responded to by me in the attached communication: ToCourtofAppealccGLD(Dr S Panigrahi v Prime Mininster CA-2023-000750)9Oct2023.docx.

 

I look forward to your response in due course.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

 

 

 3 attachments

  • Scanned by Gmail

(a) ToCourtofAppealccJessicaDaCostaCenLonCtyCrtMaidstoneCrownCourt(ASE CA_2023-000750)30Sep2023.docx

(b) ToJudiciaryDutyJudgeSaturday13January2024(PROCEEDINGS ON CLAIM E35YM660)12Jan2024.docx

(c) ToCourtofAppealccGLD(Dr S Panigrahi v Prime Mininster CA-2023-000750)9Oct2023.docx

 

(a)

CASE: CA-2023-000750: JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME AT NORTH KENT MAGISTRATES COURT AND KENT POLICE

Inbox

 

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>

cc:         Jessica Da Costa <jessica.dacosta@governmentlegal.gov.uk>,

Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>,

date:     30 Sept 2023, 18:21

subject:               CASE: CA-2023-000750: JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME AT NORTH KENT MAGISTRATES COURT AND KENT POLICE

mailed-by:         gmail.com

 

To

The Court of Appeal

 

FOR THE ATTENTION OF MASTER BANCROFT-RIMMER

 

Your Honour

 

Further to my application for the Court of Appeal to declare that there has been a Judicial and Law Enforcement Conspiracy against me in relation to the linked proceedings: NO FURTHER ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN ON STALKING AND MALICIOUS COMMUNICATIONS OFFENCES? (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/no-further-actions-to-be-taken-on-stalking-and-malicious-communications-offences I beg to provide clarification after 5 months of towing and froing and also in relation to Claim E35YM660 at the Central London Count Court wherein I have claimed £10 million in damages and compensation from the UK-Treasury for the 26 years of police brutality, religious persecution, victimisation, obstruction of justice and perverting of the course of justice across the board of all the institutions associated with the matter, such as the Legal Ombudsman, Solicitors Regulation Authority, Independent Office for Police Conduct, and other civil and criminal courts.

 

In this specific Case of the criminal proceedings mounted against me, today’s revelations are that when North Kent Magistrates Court and Kent Police were caught with their pants down in not being able to charge me of any offences like Speeding, stalking and malicious communications that they say that they had a reasonable suspicion that I had committed them following two years of Police investigations and 6 arrests with the confiscation of four computers, four USB Memory Sticks, two Amazon pads and two Mobile Phone by Kent Police, they then resorted to starting afresh the process of investigation by bailing me again till 21 December 2023 20.00 hours, and not responding to the clarifications that I need.

 

In regard to this I attach the relevant Court Orders that are under Appeal at the Court of Appeal:

CentLonCtyCrt(NOTICEOFHEARINGOFAPPLICATION.pdf.

CentralLondonCourtCourtOrder 21 June 2021(District Judge Lightman).pdf.

CentralLondonCountyCourtOrderonE35YM660(dated19January2021_receivedbyClaimantat 9.27 am on27March2021.pdf.

 

I should accordingly be grateful if you would rule in my favour and arrange the damages and compensation as stated above.

 

I am copying this email to Maidstone Crown Court to take the measures needed to bring charges against the Magistrate at North Kent Magistrates Court and the Chief Constable of Kent Police for misfeasance in public office.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619

3

 Attachments

  • Scanned by Gmail

 

(a) CentLonCtyCrt(NOTICEOFHEARINGOFAPPLICATION.pdf.

(b) CentralLondonCourtCourtOrder 21 June 2021(District Judge Lightman).pdf.

(c) CentralLondonCountyCourtOrderonE35YM660(dated19January2021_receivedbyClaimantat 9.27 am on27March2021.pdf.

(a)

Notice of Hearing of Application

In the County Court at Central London

Claim Number E35YM660

Date: 13 December 2022

DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref

MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1st Defendant Ref

Z1819776/MMX HO19

The hearing of the claimant’s application dated 23.06.2022

Will take place at 10.00 AM on the 20 January 2023 at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts Of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.

Time Estimate 1 hour IN PERSON before a Circuit Judge

LISTING POLICY: The court’s listing policy is determined by the senior judge and implemented by staff in accordance with his directions. Your case may not be allocated to a judge until the day of the hearing, and may have to wait in the unassigned list until a judge becomes available to hear it. Every effort will be made to ensure that your case is heard at this or another convenient court. If it is not possible to provide a judge to hear your case, the court and Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service will not be responsible for any costs incurred in the absence of any departure from listing policy due to maladministration.

Parties should be aware that this case may be one of several cases that have been listed to commence at this time. This may mean that your case will not be called immediately at the time scheduled, but may be heard later in the day. We will try to ensure that if your case is listed in the morning it is heard by 1 pm and if your case is listed in the afternoon it is heard by 4 pm. In some circumstances it is possible that your hearing could overrun. You and any witnesses should therefore be available until the end of these periods or even later.

If there are special reasons why this is inconvenient you may make a short notice application to a circuit judge to adjourn. Ordinary inconvenience arising from the fact of being in the unassigned list will not be sufficient reason for an adjournment, nor will the fact that both parties agree to an adjournment.

ACCESSIBILITY: Please inform us as soon as possible if you, your witnesses or legal representatives have a physical disability that may affect your attendance at this court. We can make alternative arrangements for the case to be heard in a suitable court room by calling the Customer Service Team on 0300 123 3577.

FILING OF SKELETON ARGUMENTS AND TRIAL BUNDLES: Trial bundles (if applicable) should be lodged no earlier than 3 working days before the trial (unless otherwise ordered). All trial bundles should be

. phoning our Disability Contact Officer 0207 947 6063.

To help us provide the best help and support, you should try to explain how your disability affects you and give as much information as you can. This will help our staff or the judge to consider what you’ll need to do during your case and any help we can provide. Our staff will always talk with you and agree any reasonable adjustments you need.

(TRUNCATED)

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent

ME8 0S

 

(b)

General Form of Judgment or Order

In the County Court at Central London

Claim Number E35YM660

Date 21 June 2021

(The County Court Sealed)

173

DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref

MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1ST Defendant Ref

Z1819776/H019

Before District Judge Lightman sitting at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building,

Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.

IT IS ORDERED THAT

1. It is recorded that:

(a). The Court has sought to join the Claimant in the BT Meet Me hearing listed for today at 11.40 am. The Court telephoned at least thrice the Claimant on the telephone number given by him in his application dated 19 June 2021 as 07967789619 but the telephone was not picked up.

(b) The application dated 19 June 2021 of the Claimant to adjourn be refused.

(c) Today’s hearing is merely to assess costs. The District Judge today has no other jurisdiction.

2. The Claim Form having been struck out, judgment for the Defendant.

3. Claimant shall pay the Defendant’s costs assessed in total as £4,170 payable by 4 pm on 5 July

2021.

Dated 21 June 2021

____________________________________________________________________

The Court office at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London,

WC2A 2LL.When corresponding with the court please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the Claim

Number. Tel 0300 123 5577. Check if you can issue your claim online. It will save you time and money. Go to

www.moneyclaim.gov.uk to find out more.

N1 General Form of Judgment or Order

Produced by S. Mirza

CJR 005C

 

(c)

General Form of Judgment or Order

In the County Court at Central London

Claim Number E35YM660

Date 19 January 2021

(The County Court Sealed)

 

DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref

MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1ST Defendant Ref Z1819776/H019

 

Before His Honour Judge Parfitt sitting at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.

 

On the Court hearing the Appellant but the Appellant withdrawing from the telephone hearing after making his submission and on the Appellant’s request to reconsider the permission to appeal refused by HHJ Letham by Order dated 30 September 2019

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT

1. The request to reconsider permission is refused.

2. The Appellant;s application was totally without merit: the DDJ’s Order was wholly appropriate as a case management order and the stated grounds of appeal that the

Appellant lacked access to legal advice was hopeless and the oral argument put forward that the DDJ was a liar acting as part of a conspiracy to silence the Appellant was absurd (both in its premise and in its substance – since the order under appeal gave the Appellant a final chance to make his particulars of claim good).

3. The Respondent’s application for costs of the action must be referred to a DJ pursuant to CPR 3.5 (2)(a) and the Respondent’s letter dated 13 January 2021 and two cost schedules contained in the Appeal bundle (in pdf format) shall be treated as application in that respect.

4. The Respondent’s costs of the appeal are to be treated as Respondent’s costs in the action.

 

Dated 19 January 2021

 

In compliance with GDPR reaquirements the privacy notice sets out the standards that you can expect from the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) and Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) when we process personal data about you in the context of civil court proceedings; how you can get access to a copy of your personal data; and what you can do ir you think standards are not being met. Please see link below for further information:

____________________________________________________________________The Court office at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.When corresponding with the court please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the Claim Number. Tel 0300 123 5577. Check if you can issue your claim online. It will save you time and money. Go to www.moneyclaim.gov.uk to find out more.

____________________________________________________________________

Automatic Response

Inbox

 

from:    Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     30 Sept 2023, 18:23

subject:               Automatic Response

mailed-by:         justice.gov.uk

Signed by:          justice.gov.uk

security:              Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

Thank you for your email.

Legal Representatives

Pursuant Practice Direction 51O of the CPR, all documents must be filed via CE-File. Any documents received via post or email will be destroyed via confidential waste, only documents with cheques will be returned to you

For Unrepresented Parties only

URGENT applications should be submitted to the court via email to this address: civilappeals.urgentwork@justice.gov.uk  between 9am and 4.15 pm

What may be deemed as urgent:

Cases where in the interests of justice a substantive decision is required within 7 days.  The types of work listed below fall into this category

•        Child cases

•        Committal appeals

•        Applications for stay of removal

•        Evictions

•        Cases (including ancillary applications) with a hearing listed in the Court of Appeal within the next month

•        Applications for an urgent stay of execution

 

•        Covid-19 related cases e.g., medical guidance regarding priority patients

NON-URGENT applications should be emailed to: civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk 

This auto response is confirmation that your email has been received and you will not receive a separate acknowledgement. Staff will follow the internal processes that have been established to process your application as quickly as possible.

All appellant’s notices will be accepted in the first instance on the basis that they may be rejected at a later date for want of jurisdiction.

Fresh applications for permission to appeal must include:

•             a completed appellant’s notice (form N161)

•             grounds of appeal on a separate sheet

•             The appropriate court fee via your PBA account, a completed Help with Fees form (EX160) or by contacting the RCJ Fees Office on 0203 936 8957 or by emailing RCJfeespayments@justice.gov.uk  between the hours of 10:00am and 16:00pm, Monday to Friday (except bank holidays)

•             a copy of the sealed order being appealed.

•             A transcript of judgment should also be provided if available (or should be ordered immediately)

The public counter at E307 (Registry) remains closed, however a drop box facility is available at the main entrance into the Royal Courts of Justice.

Once the appellant’s notice is issued, all queries should be emailed to the appropriate following addresses:

The court will issue orders electronically in the first instance.

You can find contact details for other courts in other jurisdictions at the Courts & Tribunals Finder.

Customer feedback

The Court of Appeal – Civil Division accepts online complaints through the HMCTS online complaint form: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/complaints-procedure

The online customer feedback system has been designed to help customers make an administrative complaint through the HM Courts & Tribunals Service process. It will also help us to learn from customer feedback to feed into possible improvements to the way we work.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an automated Delivery Response. Please do NOT reply to this email, it will NOT be viewed.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

...

 

[Message clipped]  View entire message

____________________________________________________________________

CASE: CA-2023-000750: JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME AT NORTH KENT MAGISTRATES COURT AND KENT POLICE

Inbox

 

from:    Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     30 Sept 2023, 18:23

subject:               RE: CASE: CA-2023-000750: JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME AT NORTH KENT MAGISTRATES COURT AND KENT POLICE

mailed-by:         justice.gov.uk

Signed by:          justice.gov.uk

security:              Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.

 

Thank You

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

____________________________________________________________________

Automatic reply: CASE: CA-2023-000750: JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME AT NORTH KENT MAGISTRATES COURT AND KENT POLICE

Inbox

 

from:    maidstonecrowncourt <maidstonecrowncourt@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     30 Sept 2023, 18:23

subject:               Automatic reply: CASE: CA-2023-000750: JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT CONSPIRACY AGAINST ME AT NORTH KENT MAGISTRATES COURT AND KENT POLICE

Signed by:          justice.gov.uk

security:              Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

 

DO NOT REPLY

 

(This inbox is monitored between 9am to 5pm)

 

Thank you for contacting Maidstone Crown Court. This automated response confirms that we have received it, please do not chase with a phone call.

We will try to reply to your email within 10 working days. We may take longer to reply to you.

PLEASE NOTE:

The Listing Team is currently working on the backlog of cases and a date will be provided in due course.

Any requests for hearings to be heard via CVP must be received before 1:30pm the day before the hearing.

Any requests for changes to the list must be made before 2:30pm the day before the hearing.

We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible. Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner.

Please refrain from sending emails to multiple accounts including personal email accounts this could result in your email being incorrectly distributed.

If your query is urgent, please call the Crown General Office on 01622 202000

Please Note:Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable you give legal advice.

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

 

(b)

PROCEEDINGS ON CLAIM E35YM660

Inbox

 

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

cc:         Jessica Da Costa <jessica.dacosta@governmentlegal.gov.uk>

date:     13 Jan 2024, 07:09

subject:               PROCEEDINGS ON CLAIM E35YM660

mailed-by:         gmail.com

 

To

Judiciary

(for the directions of the Duty Judge on Saturday 13 January 2024)

 

Your Honour

 

Please let me know in light of the present update as linked here:

https://www.thelibertariandemocrats.com/forum/diary-of-the-author/13-january-2024-06-40-am-uk-time if there is any likelihood that the Hearing of 20 January 2023 attached: CenLonCtyCrtNOTICEOFHEARINGOFAPPLICATION.pdf under which some several millions of pounds is outstanding as my representation to the Court for damages and compensation from the United Kingdom Treasury will now be acted upon by the Court with or without a Hearing so that this matter can be brought to a closure.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

 

One attachment

  • Scanned by Gmail

CentLonCtyCrtNOTICE OF HEARING OF APPLICATION.pdf

Notice of Hearing of Application

In the County Court at Central London Claim Number E35YM660

Date: 13 December 2022

DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref

MRS THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1st Defendant Ref Z1819776/MMX HO19

The hearing of the claimant’s application dated 23.06.2022

Will take place at 10.00 AM on the 20 January 2023 at the County Court at Central London, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts Of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.

Time Estimate 1 hour IN PERSON before a Circuit Judge

LISTING POLICY: The court’s listing policy is determined by the senior judge and implemented by staff in accordance with his directions. Your case may not be allocated to a judge until the day of the hearing, and may have to wait in the unassigned list until a judge becomes available to hear it. Every effort will be made to ensure that your case is heard at this or another convenient court. If it is not possible to provide a judge to hear your case, the court and Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service will not be responsible for any costs incurred in the absence of any departure from listing policy due to maladministration.

Parties should be aware that this case may be one of several cases that have been listed to commence at this time. This may mean that your case will not be called immediately at the time scheduled, but may be heard later in the day. We will try to ensure that if your case is listed in the morning it is heard by 1 pm and if your case is listed in the afternoon it is heard by 4 pm. In some circumstances it is possible that your hearing could overrun. You and any witnesses should therefore be available until the end of these periods or even later.

If there are special reasons why this is inconvenient you may make a short notice application to a circuit judge to adjourn. Ordinary inconvenience arising from the fact of being in the unassigned list will not be sufficient reason for an adjournment, nor will the fact that both parties agree to an adjournment.

 

ACCESSIBILITY: Please inform us as soon as possible if you, your witnesses or legal representatives have a physical disability that may affect your attendance at this court. We can make alternative arrangements for the case to be heard in a suitable court room by calling the Customer Service Team on 0300 123 3577.

 

FILING OF SKELETON ARGUMENTS AND TRIAL BUNDLES: Trial bundles (if applicable) should be lodged no earlier than 3 working days before the trial (unless otherwise ordered). All trial bundles should be

. phoning our Disability Contact Officer 0207 947 6063.

To help us provide the best help and support, you should try to explain how your disability affects you and give as much information as you can. This will help our staff or the judge to consider what you’ll need to do during your case and any help we can provide. Our staff will always talk with you and agree any reasonable adjustments you need.

(TRUNCATED)

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore Gillingham Kent

ME8 0SL

____________________________________________________________________

PROCEEDINGS ON CLAIM E35YM660

Inbox

 

Shantanu Panigrahi

Attachments07:09 (32 minutes ago)

ToJudiciary(for the directions of the Duty Judge on Saturday 13 January 2024) Your Honour Please let me know in light of the present update as linked here: http

 

from:    Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     13 Jan 2024, 07:09

subject:               RE: PROCEEDINGS ON CLAIM E35YM660

mailed-by:         justice.gov.uk

Signed by:          justice.gov.uk

security:              Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.

 

Thank You

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

 

(c)

CA-2023-000750 - Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK

Inbox

 

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>

date:     9 Oct 2023, 15:12

subject:               Fwd: CA-2023-000750 - Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK

mailed-by:         gmail.com

 

To

The Court of Appeal

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

On receipt of your email from Tahsin Khan, I was very confused, but I am a mental patient so referred it to the Magistrates locally for comment, as follows:

 

I would be grateful for a reconsideration accordingly,

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 14:14

Subject: Fwd: CA-2023-000750 - Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK

To: Northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>

 

To

Magistrates

North Kent Magistrates Court

sitting at Medway Magistrates Court

 

Your Honour

 

 

I have received the following email from the Court of Appeal that I find distorting in that the matter referred to the Court not only specified the criminal activities of Kent Police and court officials at North Kent Magistrates Court and Folkestone Magistrates Court that the Court has removed from its decision identifying the jurisdiction issue that it is concerned with which in itself is ambiguous in that it indicates that I have a right to appeal the Parfit/Lightman decisions at the High Court but not at the Court of Appeal, Further by making the subject of the email what it is, it further adds salt to injury that the Magistrates would please take into account and adjudicate.

 

As a layman, this email is designed to protect the criminal activities of successive Judges against me from the time of the inception of Claim E35YM660 at the CCMCC through its passage in the  various stages of its progress in the Court of Central London, including Judge Bachkous, Judge Lentham, Judge Parfit, Judge Lightman plus some unnamed judges. I am supposed to accept this injustice against me that is solely the overall responsibility of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to ensure that the government has in place a viable judicial and law-enforcement system.

 

Please once again let me know whether the Medway Magistrates Court or the Folkestone Magistrates Court is processing my Defence against Speeding, stalking/harassment, and malicious communications that I have yet to be served court summons for.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

 

---------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>

Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 at 10:44

Subject: CA-2023-000750 - Panigrahi v Prime Minister of UK

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

“Further to your correspondence regarding your dispute of the jurisdiction directions given in this matter, it was referred to Lady Justice Andrews for a review of the jurisdiction directions given by the Jurisdiction Lawyer.

 

Lady Justice Andrews directed as follows, following referral by the Jurisdiction Lawyer:

 

“As far as I can see the District Judge made an order which Dr Panigrahi then sought permission to appeal to the Circuit Judge (the correct route). HH Judge Lethem refused permission on the papers and because there is a right to seek reconsideration at an oral hearing, Dr Panigrahi then made a further application which was refused by HH Judge Parfitt. I agree with your decision that the Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction in this case.

 

You are right that the Court of Appeal cannot entertain an appeal against the District Judge's original order; an appeal lies only to a Circuit Judge sitting in the County Court pursuant to Article 5(3) of the Access to Justice Act 1999 (Destination of Appeals) Order 2016. Dr Panigrahi rightly sought permission from the Circuit Judge.

 

You are also right that no court (including the Court of Appeal) has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against the refusal of permission to appeal - the refusal of permission is the end of road. Section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act makes that clear.

 

The proviso to s.54(4) preserves the rules of court which allow an oral renewal of an application for permission to appeal to a judge of the same level as the judge who refused on paper.  That right was abolished in the Court of Appeal but not in the lower courts. In essence the telephone hearing before Judge Parfitt was an oral hearing of the same application for permission to appeal as was refused by Judge Lethem (it is termed a reconsideration, see CPR 52.4(2)).

 

There simply is no right of appeal against paragraphs 1 and 2 of HH Judge Parfitt’s order because it is a refusal of permission to appeal and that means the end of the road for the would-be appellant.

 

However, paragraphs 3 and 4 of HH Judge Parfitt’s order are not within the prohibition in section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act because, although they are ancillary to the refusal of permission to appeal, they are discrete orders and therefore can be appealed with permission. That position, in relation to a costs order and refusal of an adjournment, was confirmed by this Court in Riniker v University College London (Practice Direction) [2001]1 WLR 13. Any such appeal would lie, with the permission of Judge Parfitt or a judge of the designated appeal court, in this case, the High Court, to a High Court Judge and not to the Court of Appeal.

 

There is no power to re-open the refusal of permission either: see Gregory v Turner [2003] EWCA Civ 183 where this court decided that even if the circuit judge was wrong to refuse permission to appeal against the decision of the district judge the disappointed party had no means of redress.

 

Accordingly, my view is that the Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against Judge Parfitt's order.”

 

Many thanks.

Tahsin Khan (She/Her)

Court of Appeal| Civil Appeals Office| HMCTS | Royal Courts of Justice| London| WC2A 2LL

HM Courts & Tribunals Service logo

Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you.

 

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

 One attachment

  • Scanned by Gmail

____________________________________________________________________

Automatic Response

Inbox

 

from:    Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     9 Oct 2023, 15:13

subject:               Automatic Response

mailed-by:         justice.gov.uk

Signed by:          justice.gov.uk

security:              Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

Thank you for your email.

Legal Representatives

 

Pursuant Practice Direction 51O of the CPR, all documents must be filed via CE-File. Any documents received via post or email will be destroyed via confidential waste, only documents with cheques will be returned to you

For Unrepresented Parties only

URGENT applications should be submitted to the court via email to this address: civilappeals.urgentwork@justice.gov.uk  between 9am and 4.15 pm

What may be deemed as urgent:

Cases where in the interests of justice a substantive decision is required within 7 days.  The types of work listed below fall into this category

•        Child cases

•        Committal appeals

•        Applications for stay of removal

•        Evictions

•        Cases (including ancillary applications) with a hearing listed in the Court of Appeal within the next month

•        Applications for an urgent stay of execution

•        Covid-19 related cases e.g., medical guidance regarding priority patients

NON-URGENT applications should be emailed to: civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk 

This auto response is confirmation that your email has been received and you will not receive a separate acknowledgement. Staff will follow the internal processes that have been established to process your application as quickly as possible.

All appellant’s notices will be accepted in the first instance on the basis that they may be rejected at a later date for want of jurisdiction.

Fresh applications for permission to appeal must include:

•             a completed appellant’s notice (form N161)

•             grounds of appeal on a separate sheet

•             The appropriate court fee via your PBA account, a completed Help with Fees form (EX160) or by contacting the RCJ Fees Office on 0203 936 8957 or by emailing RCJfeespayments@justice.gov.uk  between the hours of 10:00am and 16:00pm, Monday to Friday (except bank holidays)

•             a copy of the sealed order being appealed.

•             A transcript of judgment should also be provided if available (or should be ordered immediately)

The public counter at E307 (Registry) remains closed, however a drop box facility is available at the main entrance into the Royal Courts of Justice.

Once the appellant’s notice is issued, all queries should be emailed to the appropriate following addresses:

The court will issue orders electronically in the first instance.

You can find contact details for other courts in other jurisdictions at the Courts & Tribunals Finder.

Customer feedback

The Court of Appeal – Civil Division accepts online complaints through the HMCTS online complaint form: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/complaints-procedure

The online customer feedback system has been designed to help customers make an administrative complaint through the HM Courts & Tribunals Service process. It will also help us to learn from customer feedback to feed into possible improvements to the way we work.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an automated Delivery Response. Please do NOT reply to this email, it will NOT be viewed.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

...

 

[Message clipped]  View entire message

____________________________________________________________________

Automatic Response

Inbox

 

from:    Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     13 Jan 2024, 08:42

subject:               Automatic Response

mailed-by:         justice.gov.uk

Signed by:          justice.gov.uk

security:              Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

 

Thank you for your email.

Legal Representatives

 

Please note that from Monday 14th February 2022 it is now mandatory for professional users to submit all documents (e.g. bundles, skeleton arguments, application notices etc.) via E-Filing.  General correspondence may be sent by email.

 

 

 

This is pursuant to Practice Direction 51O of the CPR and the Practice Note which supplements it.

For Unrepresented Parties only

URGENT applications should be submitted to the court via email to this address: civilappeals.urgentwork@justice.gov.uk  between 9am and 4.15 pm

What may be deemed as urgent:

Cases where in the interests of justice a substantive decision is required within 7 days.  The types of work listed below fall into this category

•        Child cases

•        Committal appeals

•        Applications for stay of removal

•        Evictions

•        Cases (including ancillary applications) with a hearing listed in the Court of Appeal within the next month

•        Applications for an urgent stay of execution

•        Covid-19 related cases e.g., medical guidance regarding priority patients

 

NON-URGENT applications should be emailed to: civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk 

 

This auto response is confirmation that your email has been received and you will not receive a separate acknowledgement. Staff will follow the internal processes that have been established to process your application as quickly as possible.

 

All appellant’s notices will be accepted in the first instance on the basis that they may be rejected at a later date for want of jurisdiction.

 

Fresh applications for permission to appeal must include:

•             a completed appellant’s notice (form N161)

•             grounds of appeal on a separate sheet

•             The appropriate court fee via your PBA account, a completed Help with Fees form (EX160) or by contacting the RCJ Fees Office on 0203 936 8957 or by emailing RCJfeespayments@justice.gov.uk  between the hours of 10:00am and 16:00pm, Monday to Friday (except bank holidays)

•             a copy of the sealed order being appealed.

•             A transcript of judgment should also be provided if available (or should be ordered immediately)

The public counter at E307 (Registry) remains closed, however a drop box facility is available at the main entrance into the Royal Courts of Justice.

Once the appellant’s notice is issued, all queries should be emailed to the appropriate following addresses:

The court will issue orders electronically in the first instance.

You can find contact details for other courts in other jurisdictions at the Courts & Tribunals Finder.

Customer feedback

The Court of Appeal – Civil Division accepts online complaints through the HMCTS online complaint form: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/complaints-procedure

The online customer feedback system has been designed to help customers make an administrative complaint through the HM Courts & Tribunals Service process. It will also help us to learn from customer feedback to feed into possible improvements to the way we work.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an automated Delivery Response. Please do NOT reply to this email, it will NOT be viewed.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

...

 

[Message clipped]  View entire message

 

8 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Fw: REAPPOINTMENT OF ZOOM SESSION WITH JILL JESSON

Fw: REAPPOINTMENT OF ZOOM SESSION WITH JILL JESSON Yahoo / Inbox From: shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com To: Babu Shan Panigrahi (shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com), Shantanu Panigrahi Thu, 22 Feb at 17:36 Sent f

Quality Assurance on E35YM660 PROCEEDINGS

Quality Assurance on E35YM660 PROCEEDINGS Inbox from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> to:          Kentmc@justice.gov.uk cc:         "KMPTPALS (KENT AND MEDWAY NHS AND SOCIAL CARE

EXONERATION COMPLETED

EXONERATION COMPLETED from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> to:          Enquiries Kent <enquiries@kent.police.uk>, Force Control Kent <force.control@kent.police.uk>, PSD Complaint

bottom of page