top of page
Search

Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

Inbox

 

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Enquiries Kent <enquiries@kent.police.uk>

cc:         Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

date:     18 Feb 2024, 09:14

subject:               Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

mailed-by:         gmail.com

 

To

Kent Police

 

Dear Sirs

 

I followed up DC Fields instructions to me to contact Medway Police Station in respect of the linked communications just now to have clarified which of the items taken from us over the past two years in connection with Stalking/Harassment and Malicious communications matter of alleged offences as linked here: Charge Refused Certificate from Kent Police and the Restoration of Seized Property (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/charge-refused-certificate-from-kent-police-and-the-restoration-of-seized-property and dialled 101 for Kent Police, but could not get an answer from the operator, especially on the issue of whether the Bail to Medway Police Station that I was obliged by law to attend on 15 March 2024 remains in place, in light of the proceedings linked here: Continuing problems filing Company Tax Returns for The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/continuing-problems-filing-company-tax-returns-for-the-conservative-libertarian-publications-limited

 

My wife who is the sole owner of the property taken from us has asked me to obtain this clarification first before I go to Medway Police Station to collect the items.

 

Your attention would be most useful so that we can bring this matter to a closure now.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

_________________________________________________________________________________________

from:    Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     18 Feb 2024, 09:14

subject:               RE: Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

mailed-by:         justice.gov.uk

Signed by:          justice.gov.uk

security:              Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.

 

Thank You

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

____________________________________________________________________

Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

Inbox

 

from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

to:          Enquiries Kent <enquiries@kent.police.uk>

cc:         Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

date:     18 Feb 2024, 09:14

subject:               Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

mailed-by:         gmail.com

 

To

Kent Police

 

Dear Sirs

 

I followed up DC Fields instructions to me to contact Medway Police Station in respect of the linked communications just now to have clarified which of the items taken from us over the past two years in connection with Stalking/Harassment and Malicious communications matter of alleged offences as linked here: Charge Refused Certificate from Kent Police and the Restoration of Seized Property (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/charge-refused-certificate-from-kent-police-and-the-restoration-of-seized-property and dialled 101 for Kent Police, but could not get an answer from the operator, especially on the issue of whether the Bail to Medway Police Station that I was obliged by law to attend on 15 March 2024 remains in place, in light of the proceedings linked here: Continuing problems filing Company Tax Returns for The Conservative Libertarian Publications Limited (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/continuing-problems-filing-company-tax-returns-for-the-conservative-libertarian-publications-limited

 

My wife who is the sole owner of the property taken from us has asked me to obtain this clarification first before I go to Medway Police Station to collect the items.

 

Your attention would be most useful so that we can bring this matter to a closure now.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619

____________________________________________________________________

from:    Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>

to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date:     18 Feb 2024, 09:14

subject:               RE: Charge Refused and Restoration of Seized Property

mailed-by:         justice.gov.uk

Signed by:          justice.gov.uk

security:              Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

:               Important according to Google magic.

Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.

 

Thank You

This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

 

12 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660

CASE PROGRESSION ON CLAIM E35YM660 Inbox from:    Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> to:          constitution@parliament.uk, pacac@parliament.uk cc:         Central London DJSKEL <centr

zoom: no help forthcoming

zoom Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Forz Khan Khan Tue, 21 May at 11:50 Dear Forz Thank you for your email this morning: I have done what you asked me to do: https:/

Automatic reply: VALID CASE

Automatic reply: VALID CASE Inbox from:    Technical Advice <technical.advice@legalombudsman.org.uk> to:          Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> date:     21 May 2024, 11:04 subject:

Kommentare


bottom of page