Search

Communication from the Legal Ombudsman: SAR00514

SAR00514

Yahoo

/

Inbox

Information Rights & Security <infosec@legalombudsman.org.uk>

To:

shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com

Wed, 1 Jun at 10:54


Dear Dr Panigrahi

I refer to your request, please find the attached.

Yours sincerely,

Grace Garande

Information Governance Officer

Email: infosec@legalombudsman.org.uk


From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

Sent: 20 May 2022 21:58

To: Legal Team <legalteam@legalombudsman.org.uk>; Enquiries <Enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk>

Cc: Lauren Cullen <lauren.cullen@slatergordon.uk>; eliza.saied@embsolicitors.co.uk; Hans Sok Appadu <hansa@otssolicitors.co.uk>; Wai Leung Solicitors <mail@wlsolicitors.com>; enquiries@beckettllp.com

Subject: SUMMARY OF ALL PAST SOLICITORS/LAW FIRMS REFERRED TO THE LEGAL OMBUDSMAN FOR RESOLUTION


To

Laura Stockin


Dear Ms Stockin


I am afraid your email had ended up in my Spam folder and I only got to see it this evening. Nevertheless in the interests of justice, I am bound to request the Legal Ombudsman for a Summary of all the lawyers/lawfirms that I brought to your attention most recently Lauren Cullen of Slater & Gordon Solicitors that I did not receive a reply to from your office. I need this correspondence to accumulate the evidence that is required for CLaim J00ME372 at Medway County Court, notthstanding your view that you are not a Defendant named in the Claim Form. I have already requested Medway County Court for a 4 month extension of time needed for my Full Particulars of Claim to be submitted and this will largely be based on the correspondence that I have had with the Legal Ombudsman over the past decade. To that I would add EMB Solicitors that did not reply or answer the telephone in relation to the attached email that I sent the Firm:



Running Commentary on J00ME372: 11.27 am (UK-Time) 19 May 2022 (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/running-commentary-on-j00me372-11-27-am-uk-time-19-may-2022

Running Commentary on J00ME372: 11.27 am (UK-Time) 19 May 2022

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE NOT RECEIVED BY ME2 Yahoo / Sent Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com> To: ...

If the Legal Ombudsman has archived the previous referrals of lawyers brought to the Ombusaman, I can look through my shanpanigrahi@yahoo.co.uk email account and try and dig these up to jog your memories of where I was totally disatisfied with the manner in which you dealt with my complaints against the Law Firms.


With your response, I am determined that this matter will be resolved in Medway County Court no matter how long it takes for me to assemble the Full Particulars of Claim. This is because I have not yet received an apology from Kent Police for the wanton manner in which it investigated me and then arrested me on 24 November 2022 that Ms Lauren Cullen of Slater and Gordon was supposed to be dealing with. I have also copied this email to some of the other lawyers that were eithter investigated by the Legal Ombudsman or should now be investigated as a matter of urgency. These are embsolicirors, ots solictors, Wai Leung solicitors becketts solicotors.


I look forward to your reply as soon as possible.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent

ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619


The Legal Ombudsman

RE: Kent Police's intention to settle this Claim out of Court

Yahoo

/

Inbox

Legal Team <legalteam@legalombudsman.org.uk>


To:

shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com

Thu, 19 May at 10:38

Dear Dr Panigrahi

I can confirm receipt of the claim form.

However, as the Legal Ombudsman are not named as a Defendant there is no obligation to provide a defence.

Kind regards

Laura Stockin

Legal Manager (Solicitor)

Legal Ombudsman

www.legalombudsman.org.uk


Home

Investigating complaints between consumers and their legal service providers. Complaining isn't easy. We're here...


From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

Sent: 15 May 2022 13:57

To: People Relations UK <erteam1@bp.com>; resourcingteam@tesco.com; Human Resources (Sainsburys) <hradv.eradmin@sainsburys.co.uk>; a.westby@greenwich.ac.uk; Ray Coker <raycokerconsulting@gmail.com>; omar.sagher@governmentlegal.gov.uk; Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>; Eastkentmc <eastkentmc@justice.gov.uk>; Northkent <northkent@justice.gov.uk>; QB Judges Listing Office <qbjudgeslistingoffice@justice.gov.uk>; Marty Caine <marty.caine@gmail.com>; Sivaji Panesar <panesar@gmail.com>; Enquiries <Enquiries@legalombudsman.org.uk>; Professional Ethics Advice Service <professional.ethics@sra.org.uk>; monneka.tahir@whiteroseblackmans.co.uk; psd.srt.east@westyorkshire.pnn.police.uk; northcasework@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk; kashif.irfan@clearlyservice.com; southeast@labour.org.uk; otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int; maidstonecrowncourt <maidstonecrowncourt@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>; Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>; registry@supremecourt.uk


Subject: Fw: Kent Police's intention to settle this Claim out of Court


Dear Sirs


Although the attached proceedings do not individually name any of you, as the implicit co-conspirators against me over the past 24 years, you will be individually required to produce your defence to the Court against the allegations in the Claim Form.


If you have any queries as to the nature of my allegations that I need to elaborate on in the Particulars of Claim that will follow in due course, kindly acknowledge service of the proceedings.


Yours sincerely

Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619


----- Forwarded message -----

From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To: Enquiries Kent <enquiries@kent.police.uk>

Cc: Enquiries Medway County <enquiries.medway.countycourt@justice.gov.uk>

Sent: Sunday, 15 May 2022, 08:18:35 BST

Subject: Kent Police's intention to settle this Claim out of Court


To

The Chief Constable of Kent Police, Alan Pughesley

Kent Police


Dear Sir


I am anticipating considerable upheavals for all parties involved in this dispute that the Chief Constable has been served Notice of Issue on as attached: Document_2022-05-13_152026.pdf, with its amendment n1-eng KentPolice UpdateMay2022.pdf so before the Notice of Issue is officially deemed to have been served on Kent Police that will entail follow-up actions for both the Claimant and Defendant, I am hereby enquiring whether Kent Police will be amenable to a Meeting to discuss this matter out of court with a view to settlement out of court.


I have never ever been truly interested in damages and compensation, just what is lawfully mine, and in this regard the £55,000 severance payment due to me by the University of Greenwich for what I consider grossly unfair disciplinary procedures causing me defamation stands out, togeher with the issue of the return of our IT property taken away by Kent Police on 24 November 2021 for forensic examination. I do understand that the Police have a job to do, but I have protested my innocence emphatically unless Kent Police can produce to me new evidence that I do not currently have access to.


If I do not receive a reply from Kent Police before 10.00 am tomorrow 16 May 2022, I will await your decision as to whether Kent Police is going to issue an Acknowledgement of Service with will extend the period of time for your provide your reply in defence to the Court, or whether the Chief Constable will directly submit Kent Police's final reply before 30 May 2022 that is required by the Notice of Issue.


If no response whatsoever is received by me by 30 May 2022 to this email, I will apply for Judgment on 1 June 2022, In case of this eventuality, I am hereby requesting Medway County Court to inform me of the further Court Fee I would have to pay for Judgment to be entered.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619


For information on how we handle your personal data, see our privacy notice. www.legalombudsman.org.uk/privacy This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments. Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free. The Legal Ombudsman does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Legal Ombudsman for operational or business reasons.


For information on how we handle your personal data, see our privacy notice. www.legalombudsman.org.uk/privacy This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this e-mail or its attachments. Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free. The Legal Ombudsman does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses. Replies to this e-mail may be monitored by the Legal Ombudsman for operational or business reasons.

Download all attachments as a zip file

This email was moved from the Spam folder. Attachments may contain harmful content.

Attachments:

20220601.SAR00514.Acknowledgement.pdf 63.9kB

image002 .png 16.2kB:



20220601.SAR00514.Acknowledgement
.pdf
Download PDF • 65KB

12 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Thank you for your order Sent from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com> to: lily dac <lilydacjdfz@gmail.com> date: 30 Jun 2022, 16:11 subject: Re: Thank you for your orde