For the attention of HHJ Parfitt: E35YM660 CASE PROGRESSION
Inbox
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
to: Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>
date: 12 Dec 2024, 20:43
subject: For the attention of HHJ Parfitt: E35YM660 CASE PROGRESSION
mailed-by: gmail.com
To
Central London County Court
Your Honour
Please note the response attached that I have received from Master Meacher from the Court of Appeal: FrCourtofAppeal(Master Meacher_Lady Justice Andrews ignoring bare facts)11Dec2024.docx.
Furthermore, the Central London County Court announced a Hearing of the Claim afresh that was set for 20 January 2023 10 am, but for reasons unknown to me it was adjourned by the Circuit Judge in question. I never received any written communication from the Court to confirm what the Defendant had conveyed to me in this regard which raised suspicions in my mind that something was wrong in the handling of the Court's processes.
For these reasons I sought the advice of the Supreme Court as attached: ToSupremeCourtRegistry(Entertain_Travesty of Justice)11Dec2024.pdf; but from the evidence that I have, the Supreme Court also does not have the jurisdiction to entertain my application for a Judicial outcome to the proceedings.
I am sorry that at the time that the Hearing with Your Honour was held, I was still in the process of ascertaining all the facts so could not participate fully as I was not legally represented. The full details are now available as linked here: https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/case-progression-e35ym660-ca-2023-000750 and as attached: Particulars of Damages and Compensation J00ME572 at Medway County Court in Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Kent Police.pdf).
As I continue to be terrorised as shown in the attachment: CLOSURE APPARENTLY-digital.pdf; I wish to request Your Honour to reconsider the Hearing at your level of the Judiciary which may have been the reason that the 20 January 2023 10 am Hearing was either adjourned or discontinued by the Court of Central London.
These are the reasons that I had voiced my view that the original judgment was absurd and maybe conspiratorial, or simply highly perverse.
I would be grateful for a reply from Your Honour as soon as Your Honour has digested all the bare facts as presented here by the Appellant.
Yours sincerely
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi (Appellant)
4 attachments • Scanned by Gmail
1.FrCourtofAppeal(Master Meacher_Lady Justice Andrews ignoring bare facts)11Dec2024.docx
2.ToSupremeCourtRegistry(Entertain_Travesty of Justice)11Dec2024.pdf
3.Particulars of Damages and Compensation J00ME572 at Medway County Court in Dr Shantanu Panigrahi v Kent Police.pdf
4.CLOSURE APPARENTLY-digital.pdf:
____________________________________________________________________
For the attention of HHJ Parfitt: E35YM660 CASE PROGRESSION
from: Central London DJSKEL <centrallondondjskel@justice.gov.uk>
to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>
date: 12 Dec 2024, 20:44
subject: RE: For the attention of HHJ Parfitt: E35YM660 CASE PROGRESSION
mailed-by: justice.gov.uk
Signed by: justice.gov.uk
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important according to Google magic.
Thank You for your email message which is now in the judicial email inbox. This inbox is only viewed by judiciary and court staffs do not have access to this account. This auto response confirms that the message has arrived and will be dealt with in due course.
Thank You
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.
Comments