LEGAL ADVICE AND REPRESENTATION
from: Shantanu Panigrahi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
date: 16 Aug 2023, 17:24
subject: LEGAL ADVICE AND REPRESENTATION
QUIGG GOLDEN SOLICITORS LIMITED
1 Tonbridge Road
I am in need of legal advice and possibly also legal representation if the matter goes that far in light of the attached correspondence from the Court of Appeal that is causing me concern: FrCourtofAppeal(CA_2023_000750closed)16Aug2023.docx.
The main issue is that when Master Bancroft-Rimmer had issued directions on the progress of the Appeal, how could the jurisdiction lawyer then return to issue the statement that the Case is closed and is not adjourned to a Hearing. I had appealed Master Bancroft-Rimmer’s direction requesting his judgment that the matter may be referred to a Judicial Review if the Hearing is not listed at the Court of Appeal, and the decision cannot be appealed to the Supreme Court.
I would be grateful if you would examine the matter and let me know if you have any advice and what your fees are for this issue.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Kent ME8 0SL
• Scanned by Gmail
RE: CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS
from: Civil Appeals - Registry <email@example.com>
to: Shantanu Panigrahi <firstname.lastname@example.org>
date: 16 Aug 2023, 15:41
subject: RE: CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS
Signed by: justice.gov.uk
security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more
: Important mainly because it was sent directly to you.
Jurisdiction Lawyer Levey has directed as follows;
“I refer to the email received from Shantanu Panigrahi dated 9 August 2023.
By email dated 18 July 2023 my directions were conveyed to you advising that the Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to entertain appeals against the orders of HHJ Parfitt and DJ Lightman.
This direction was reviewed by Master Bancroft-Rimmer. By email dated 8 August 2023, it was confirmed that the Master agreed with my directions.
Accordingly, this matter has not been adjourned to an oral hearing.
This matter is at an end in this Court.”
Civil Appeals Office | Room E308 | Royal Courts of Justice | Strand | London | WC2A 2LL | DX 44456 Strand
Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you
From: Shantanu Panigrahi <email@example.com>
Sent: 09 August 2023 16:50
To: Civil Appeals - Registry <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS
The Court of Appeal
For due action by Master Bancroft-Rimmer
My lawyers Olives Solicitors have been usurped and manipulated by agents of the State unknown acting from behind the scenes to draw them into a criminal conspiracy against me as evident from the fact that no reply was received to the communication linked here: CONSULTATION ON CA-2023-000750 (COURT OF APPEAL) (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/consultation-on-ca-2023-000750-court-of-appeal
An attempt by me to have the dispute resolved through Professional Standards Department of Kent Police and the independent Office for Police Conduct also met with dead silence, as linked here: Complaint Resolution (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/complaint-resolution
Your Honour, I had circulated your decision endorsing the direction of jurisdiction Levey at the Court of Appeal widely but no State authority was willing to reply; see link here: Fw: Failure Notice: reported to the Attorney General (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/fw-failure-notice-reported-to-the-attorney-general.
This brings me to the email that you sent me yesterday as attached here:FrCivilAppealsRegistry(CourtofAppeal)8Aug2023 in which your Honour seemed to agree that if the results of the proceedings that I have litigated and in turn being arrested for on suspected alleged malicious communications and stalking offences were not to my satisfaction, you would list a Hearing at the Court of Appeal of all significant parties to the dispute.
I plead with you that this Hearing must be held without delay as a matter of priority as no other Court can consider the matters that have been raised.
Please acknowledge this email for legal purposes.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.