top of page
Search

RE: CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS

RE: CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS

Inbox


from: Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>

to: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

date: 16 Aug 2023, 15:41

subject: RE: CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS

mailed-by: justice.gov.uk

Signed by: justice.gov.uk

security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more

: Important mainly because it was sent directly to you.


Dear Sir/Madam,


Jurisdiction Lawyer Levey has directed as follows;


I refer to the email received from Shantanu Panigrahi dated 9 August 2023.


By email dated 18 July 2023 my directions were conveyed to you advising that the Court of Appeal has no jurisdiction to entertain appeals against the orders of HHJ Parfitt and DJ Lightman.


This direction was reviewed by Master Bancroft-Rimmer. By email dated 8 August 2023, it was confirmed that the Master agreed with my directions.


Accordingly, this matter has not been adjourned to an oral hearing.


This matter is at an end in this Court.”


Kind Regards


Dahnish Saleem


Civil Appeals Office | Room E308 | Royal Courts of Justice | Strand | London | WC2A 2LL | DX 44456 Strand

Email: civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk

Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you


From: Shantanu Panigrahi <shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com>

Sent: 09 August 2023 16:50

To: Civil Appeals - Registry <civilappeals.registry@justice.gov.uk>

Subject: CA-2023-000750 PROCEEDINGS


To

The Court of Appeal


For due action by Master Bamcroft Rimmer


Your Honour


My lawyers Olives Solicitors have been usurped and manipulated by agents of the State unknown acting from behind the scenes to draw them into a criminal conspiracy against me as evident from the fact that no reply was received to the communication linked here: CONSULTATION ON CA-2023-000750 (COURT OF APPEAL) (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/consultation-on-ca-2023-000750-court-of-appeal


An attempt by me to have the dispute resolved through Professional Standards Department of Kent Police and the independent Office for Police Conduct also met with dead silence, as linked here: Complaint Resolution (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/complaint-resolution



Your Honour I had circulated your decision endorsing the direction of jurisdiction Levey at the Court of Appeal widely but no State authority was willing to reply; see link here: Fw: Failure Notice: reported to the Attorney General (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/fw-failure-notice-reported-to-the-attorney-general.


This brings me to the email that you sent me yesterday as attached here:FrCivilAppealsRegistry(CourtofAppeal)8Aug2023 in which your Honour seemed to agree that if the results of the proceedings that I have litigated and in turn arrested for suspected alleged malicious communications and stalking offences were not to my satisfaction, you would list a Hearing at the Court of Appeal of all significant parties to the dispute.


I plead with you that this Hearing must be held without delay as a matter of priority as no other Court can consider the matters that have been raised.


Please acknowledge this email for legal purposes.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent

United Kingdom

Tel: 07967789619


This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.

5 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

LegalVision | Unable to Assist with Enquiry

LegalVision | Unable to Assist with Enquiry Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Standards Officer Liberal Democrats Mon, 17 Jun at 11:27 To The Standards Officer Liberal

LegalVision | Unable to Assist with Enquiry

LegalVision | Unable to Assist with Enquiry Yahoo/Sent Shantanu Panigrahi From:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com To:Labour Membership Mon, 17 Jun at 11:36 Dear Sir/Madam I have waited long enough for an exp

Comments


bottom of page