Search

RE: JUDICIAL REVIEW: CASE REFERENCE NO CO/1680/2002

RE: JUDICIAL REVIEW: CASE REFERENCE NO CO/1680/2002

Yahoo

/

Inbox

Shantanu Panigrahi <shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com>

To:

Administrative Court Office, Case Progression

Cc:

Enquiries Kent Police,

Enquiries Medway County Court

Wed, 17 Aug at 13:13


Dear Ms Relcoceri


I had already expected this decision of the Court as i informed Kent Police this morning: see the link here:

PROGRESS IN KENT POLICE'S INVESTIGATION OF STALKING-HARASSMENT BY DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/progress-in-kent-police-s-investigation-of-stalking-harassment-by-dr-shantanu-panigrahi

PROGRESS IN KENT POLICE'S INVESTIGATION OF STALKING-HARASSMENT BY DR SHA...

PROGRESS IN KENT POLICE'S INVESTIGATION OF STALKING-HARASSMENT BY DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI Yahoo / Sent Shantanu Pa...


I would never Appeal against the decision of a Judicial Review under Case Reference Number CO/1680/2002 as it will waste Court time and, in all like-lihood, would be an abuse of the process of Court if not contempt of court as well. As you will note I had informed Kent Police that I had terminated my proceedings in accepting that all Police Forces are individually a law to themselves with no judicial oversight of a claim that it has abused their powers.


Thank you for this warning that I might be jumping from the frying pan into the fire if I did appeal in a futile course of action, given that Her Majesty the Queen effectively authorised the victimisation perpetrated on me over the past 24 years.


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi


Hide original message

On Wednesday, 17 August 2022 at 12:11:31 BST, Administrative Court Office, Case Progression <caseprogression@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk> wrote:


Dear Sirs,


Thank you for your email,


Unfortunately, your claim cannot be reopened in the admin court, you may wish to seek legal advice if you wish to appeal this decision.


Kind Regards,

Ardiana Retkoceri

Case Progression Team I Administrative Court Office

Queen's Bench Division | HMCTS | Royal Courts of Justice| Strand, London | WC2A 2LL

*OFFICIAL*

Phone: 020 7947 6655

Web: www.gov.uk/hmcts


PLEASE DO NOT SEND EMAILS TO PERSONAL INBOXES AS NO ACTION WILL BE TAKEN. PERSONAL INBOXES ARE NOT MONITORED. PLEASE SEND ALL EMAILS TO:

For all civil matters: caseprogression@administrativecourt.justice.gov.uk

For all criminal and extradition matters: crimex@administrativecourt.justice.gov.uk


cid:image001.gif@01D2516A.D6B22CB0

For information on how HMCTS uses personal data about you please see: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about/personal-information-charter


From: Shantanu Panigrahi [mailto:shantanupanigrahi@yahoo.com]

Sent: 16 August 2022 15:24

To: Administrative Court Office, Case Progression <caseprogression@administrativecourtoffice.justice.gov.uk>

Subject: JUDICIAL REVIEW: CASE REFERENCE NO CO/1680/2002


To

Ardiana Retkoceri

Case Progression Team I Administrative Court Office

Queen's Bench Division | HMCTS | Royal Courts of Justice| Strand, London | WC2A 2LL

*OFFICIAL*

Phone: 020 7947 6655

Web: www.gov.uk/hmcts


Dear Madam

I write with reference to the linked communications with the Court:


JUDICIAL REVIEW AT THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: CASE CO/1680/2002 (knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com) https://www.knowledgeassessmentanddissemination.com/post/judicial-review-at-the-administrative-court-case-co-1680-2002

Text Box:

JUDICIAL REVIEW AT THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT: CASE CO/1680/2002

RE: BP Reinvent Shares and Employment prospects with BP * OFFICIAL *3 Yahoo / Inbox Administrative Court Office,...


I understand that the Case was closed on 23/08/2002.


The reason I was unable to continue with the Case and communicate my depositions to the Court is that I had been found to have abused the process of Court and was harassed and persecuted in the Televised Media and other social activities by what I considered was State-organised persecution. I therefore sought asylum out of the country and was arrested by Dover Police on travel to France to escape this victimisation. I was incarcerated in a mental hospital promptly for 3 months in 2004 and when I came out 3 months later, I was so depressed that I could not do anything other than menial jobs to make ends meet. When I started getting hold of myself, I resumed my legal fght for justice at the Supreme Court of India which led to a further incarceration in a mental hospital in 2008 this time for one month. It was therefore clear to me that the United Kingdom State did not wish me to issue legal proceedings, so I went on doing work as at petrol stations.


But this did not satisfy me, I had to learn to live again and study the Humanities and so I developed a Blog https://shantanup.wordpress.com whilst being kept in the Care in the Community provisions of the Mental Health provisions of the National Health Service diagnosed first as having persistent delusional disorder and then paranoid schizophrenia and autism as well as Personality Disorder. When people read my Blog, I was harassed incessantly so I complained to Kent Police and it took no action as against Egregious_G, phands, Devi8 among others. I blogged these matters too and the State through the prompting of the Consultant Psychiatrist got Wordpress to suspend and archive my Blog which contained all my Scientific and Religious compilations and was entitled 'Knowledge for world conservation that I dedicated myself towards for want to do something useful in my life.


I had problems coping and took legal action when my attempts to pursue a political career were thwarted by the Labour Party, UKIP and Liberal Democrats.


All my attempts were thwarted by racial discrimination as a Hate Crime which I reported to Kent Police but it took no action. Then in 2017 I was charged with not paying a Speeding Fine by Kent Police falsifying my correspondence, so I took out a case against Kent Police at the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court under HQ17X01773, but it got struck out without a Defence being filed. I appealed, but then the harassment on me took a drastic turn for the worse with a firm of criminals calling itself Victims of Panigrahi Association who tried to boot me out of the country by making me stateless and failing that to have me incarcerated a third time this time assumed to be irreversibly for which a Forensic Consultant Psychiatrist was employed. I had done nothing wrong and considered that the Prime Minister had thee overall responsibility to reign in the mental health authorities and the VOPA criminals so took out a litigation against the then Prime Minister Mrs Theresa May under Claim E35YM660. The Court of Central London struck out the Case on a technicality and all appeals came to nothing.


This is when Kent Police terrorised me by concocting allegations that I had harassed individuals like Katrina Sale of the Conservative Party, BP, and staff of BLM Law. I was interrogated and arrested 11, and 9 months but no charges have been made. It was the height of abuse of Police powers that led me to take out an injunction against the Chief Constable of Kent Police under Claim J00ME572 with associated Money Claims application for damages and compensation to me of £3.5 million.


What do I need to do to get CO/1680/2002 Case reopened, please?


Yours sincerely


Dr Shantanu Panigrahi

3 Hoath Lane

Wigmore

Gillingham

Kent ME8 0SL

Tel: 07967789619


Ardiana Retkoceri

Case Progression Team I Administrative Court Office

Queen's Bench Division | HMCTS | Royal Courts of Justice| Strand, London | WC2A 2LL

*OFFICIAL*

Phone: 020 7947 6655

Web: http://www.gov.uk/hmctse

____________________________________________________________________

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

____________________________________________________________________

===========

The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and are intended for the use of the correct recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please contact the author immediately. It is an offence to disclose or distribute the contents of this email and/or any attachments without consent of the author.

If your email has not been acknowledged or answered within 5 working days, or if you have difficulty reading this email or any attachment included, please contact the author on the number quoted above.

The author is not authorised to bind the Department contractually, or to make representations or other statements which may bind the Department in any way via electronic means.

===========

_____________________________________________________________________

This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.

For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com

______________________________________________________________________

12 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All